The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #741  
Old 10-31-2018, 07:45 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,495
The 1980s wasn't the 18th century, or even the 19th. The Queen would be the only person powerful enough to order that proof of virginity be supplied for Charles's bride and I'm absolutely certain she didn't.

Books about Charles and Diana often state that any woman Charles married 'had' to be a virgin, in order to partly explain why Diana was chosen. There was no such condition. It had just been a suggestion of Lord Mountbatten's to prevent any ex lovers selling salacious stories to the tabloids.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #742  
Old 11-01-2018, 12:17 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 670
The Prince of Wales and Lady Diana Spencer: 29 July 1981

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
The 1980s wasn't the 18th century, or even the 19th. The Queen would be the only person powerful enough to order that proof of virginity be supplied for Charles's bride and I'm absolutely certain she didn't.



Books about Charles and Diana often state that any woman Charles married 'had' to be a virgin, in order to partly explain why Diana was chosen. There was no such condition. It had just been a suggestion of Lord Mountbatten's to prevent any ex lovers selling salacious stories to the tabloids.


I looked it up; virginity doesn’t exist and is merely a social concept, though highly revered in some countries/cultures. And I was mistaken, Uncle Dickie only suggested Charles marry a virgin; I didn’t know it was to prevent any previous ex-lovers from spilling stories to the press.

The Queen was a virgin on her wedding day; was it required back then?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #743  
Old 11-01-2018, 02:23 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,495
I don't think the Queen was brought up with the idea that sex before marriage was normal. Girls weren't encouraged to indulge in that sort of behaviour. Plus, Elizabeth had loved Philip since she was 13, and no they weren't lovers before marriage.

Some people did have premarital sex in the 1940s (and previously) but there was always a risk of pregnancy in those pre-pill days. The contraception then simply wasn't very foolproof.
Reply With Quote
  #744  
Old 11-01-2018, 03:15 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 15,422
Personally, I believe that the "requirement" of a bride for Charles has been misread and misinterpreted by many in various sources. We know that Camilla was deemed as not being "marriage material" for the reason being that she had a past. If one was to do a background check of the young Diana, it would have been pretty hard to find something that pointed to Diana "having a past" as she had not seriously dated anyone before getting involved with Charles.

Its very possible that the "having a past" has been misinterpreted by some as "not being a virgin". As Diana really had no past serious involvement in a relationship, it was then assumed she was a virgin.

A royal bride needing to be a virgin is a thing of the past and really has been for quite a while. Without the benefits of birth control back then, things were done to ensure that any issue from the marriage was rightfully begotten on the right side of the blanket in order to be in the line of succession.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
Reply With Quote
  #745  
Old 07-28-2019, 09:23 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 5,851
It is hard to believe that it will be 38 years ago that Prince Charles married Lady Diana. One nice thing about their wedding day was that there was no rain.
Reply With Quote
  #746  
Old 07-28-2019, 10:03 PM
Dalriada's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 357
Just watched an interesting new documentary about the days leading up to the wedding with new items of information from Diana’s employer and Angela Rippon:
Angela Rippon opens up about her interview with Diana and Charles https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...elatedarticles
Reply With Quote
  #747  
Old 08-05-2019, 01:13 PM
Blog Real's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 4,678
8 Secrets from Princess Diana and Prince Charles' Royal Wedding
https://people.com/royals/princess-d...ampaign=440014
__________________
My blogs about monarchies
Reply With Quote
  #748  
Old 08-05-2019, 02:38 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 5,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarahedwards2 View Post
Why did Diana have to undergo a medical examination before the wedding to ensure she was a virgin; and in those days why was the bride required to be a virgin?
I read that the exam wasn't to determine virginity, but to determine fertility.

It was to make certain Diana could produce an heir.
Reply With Quote
  #749  
Old 08-05-2019, 04:55 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Burke, United States
Posts: 547
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blog Real View Post
8 Secrets from Princess Diana and Prince Charles' Royal Wedding
https://people.com/royals/princess-d...ampaign=440014
The dress] was the fulfillment of her princess fantasy,” wrote biographer Tina Brown, according to Vanity Fair. “She was insistent in her demand for its puffy sleeves and floating silk, its twenty-five-foot taffeta train, its nipped waist, and its antique lace embroidered with pearls and sequins.”
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
#royalrelatives #royalgenes anastasia 2020 armstrong-jones baptism biography bridal gown british brownbitcoinqueen canada carolin chittagong commonwealth countries coronavirus countess of snowdon cover-up dna duke of sussex dutch royal family emperor fantasy movie general news thread george vi gustaf vi adolf heraldry hill history hochberg interesting introduction jack brooksbank jewelry jumma kent languages line of succession list of rulers luxembourg mary: crown princess of denmark nepal nepalese royal family northern ireland norway history popularity prince charles prince constantijn princess alexia (2005 -) princess chulabhorn princess dita queen consort queen maud queen maxima royal balls royal court royal events royal family royal jewels royal spouse royalty royal wedding russian court dress settings startling new evidence stuart swedish queen thailand tips tracts united kingdom united states of america von hofmannsthal


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×