As an American I had it explained to be once, "You do not get to be a private person if you're a royal," or for that matter anyone famous, least in America. But mostly I think that's due to the fact that Americans become movie stars, I look at it as, that's their choice to be famous and put themselves out there to promote whatever film and so on
And I look at being royal. In Madeleine's case. Sure, she was born a royal but she didn't ask to be born royal, nobody asked her if she wanted to be hounded by the press or do official events as a child growing up. And I think for the most part she had probably a quiet childhood with few exceptions I'll never know.
I look at it as whether or not your parents have titles or not, they chose to have children out of love in today's world, less I suppose for succession I'm not sure. Sure, she might have the burdens, as I'm sure most public figures movie star or royal feel burdened from time to time.
I do not know Madeleine, dislikes, likes and whatever is printed or read it more often times than not will never reveal who she really is behind the HRH tile. Just like magazines here don't reveal who a movie star is behind their fame.
If her child has a title, I look at it as, one day as this child will grow up as a cousin of Estelle, maybe having a cousin who is styled and not just a sibling might not make you feel so burdened with doing official duties who knows. I don't remember if Madeleine's cousins have titles or not but just maybe it would be nice to be able to have a larger royal support group for official events.
Whatever the situation, styled, not styled as in Chris' choice I look at them as a family first, royal second. They're people behind gilded walls perhaps but still people with choices and concerns. We will never know what it's like to have to live with a camera in front of your private moments, a walk down the street or on your honeymoon to know press took pictures--whether or not you invited them so they might leave you alone.
For Sweden, I admire the country a great deal for it's nature, it's education, it's culture. All the things that her child, styled as seems possible, will enjoy. Perhaps not as burdened as Estelle may feel as she gets older, who knows. But in either case I think regardless where they as a family chose to live this child will grow up hearing, visiting, attending all things Swedish. It's not an end to a person's heritage on where they live or if they are or aren't titled. A heritage is something this whole family will always have and share.
I admire Madeleine out of the aspect for her humanity, which I see from work with Childhood, I admire the courage it takes to grow up in the spotlight and still try and maintain a sense of normalcy and private moments. I don't know her beyond the few times I've heard her speak during an interview. I don't know how much of her having an arrogant attitude, spoiled brat, party princess in the papers is true or not. I can't judge what I can't see. Her family, Chris and this child that's her private life and each time anyone has a baby it's special and enjoyable because it's a continuation of life, not so much dynastic means today. I don't know Chris but I admire any grown man who has a job, a career and a sense of himself, which without a title says a lot to me that he's sure of himself that he doesn't need a title to be married to a woman he fell in love with. That's what love is, loving someone regardless of a title or not for the person they are.
)
Since the first born child is the heir regardless of sex, Victoria became Crown Princess. Her daughter is a princess. If Carl Philip has a child it will be a prince or princess, so why would Madeleine's child be any different. I think that is the logic but I am not sure if it is accurate.
