Myself1995
Aristocracy
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2009
- Messages
- 236
- City
- Somewhere
- Country
- United States
It says here Wills & Kate would be married in time for the Queen's 60th jubilee.
Let's hope so!
When is the Queen's 60th jubilee?
It says here Wills & Kate would be married in time for the Queen's 60th jubilee.
Let's hope so!
When is the Queen's 60th jubilee?
I think that the Queen´s jubilee must be in 2012 but i am not shure about what month it is in...(i´m not living in England but in Denmark)
I do have one question...was it in 1952 that Princesse Elisabeth became Queen and was she not on a travel for the Commelwelth ?
The anniversary is on 06.02.2012 but probably it will celebrated in Summer like the Golden Jubilee.
So she became Queen when she came home from her travel in 1952 is that correct ?
Her father died in February 1952, but if the 60th anniversary is anything like the 50th, the celebrations will be taking place in June, the anniversary of the coronation (even though that was in 1953) rather than February, probably on account of the weather and because it's closer to tourist season. So a major royal wedding right on top of that would IMO be unlikely.
During the Olympics and the Jubilee does seem like sort of a strange time for them to get married, unless they decided they wanted less attention on the wedding ceremony for privacy reasons. Seems more likely they'd get married before both events, so they could attend them together in an official capacity. If they're getting married at all, that is - I don't think News of The World is necessarily the best source for accurate royal gossip. Although in America, the National Enquirer has broken several stories and they're just as big of a tabloid - so who knows?
I missed the bit where they said that they were going to get married before those two dates, so that makes more sense. And it also occurs to me that one of them leaked the story to get everyone off their backs and to get rid of the whole "Waity Kaity" title for her. It might be their way of indirectly announcing their engagement. They did get photographed together after the wedding with him looking attentively at her. Maybe they did that on purpose to show that they're still together after the whole "Uncle Gary" thing.But I agree that the NOTW always needs to be taken with a grain of salt. They've broken a few accurate stories this year, but in the end, they are still a tabloid.
I just call it as I see it, though I don't think Kate is suitable to be the future Queen Consort of England.
Initially, I really liked what I saw of Kate. She was naturally pretty, understated, the girl next door type and unassuming. By all accounts, she was a breath of fresh air.
.........
All of the above is just my opinion, as you asked me, and I don't purport it as fact.
I'm in no position to character assassinate the woman, so I can't make judgements concerning the degree of her confidence. In order to do so I would have to know her, and I do not.
As stated, it is the odd photo that has made me think, but that is through no real fault of her own. The lense captures a mere moment which is in no way to say that any such observation on my behalf, is justifiable. Naturally.
Kate worked as an assistant accessories buyer for Jigsaw not Topshop.
"Kate-mania" on the scale of Diana seems like a bit of a stretch - whenever I read an article about her in a British paper, as many people write in that don't like her as do. I think Diana was pretty popular when they got married. Maybe people will warm to her more if an engagement is announced.