|
View Poll Results: Where will William & Kate go for their honeymoon?
|
|
Jordan
|
   
|
8 |
8.99% |
|
Romania
|
  
|
4 |
4.49% |
|
A Caribbean island owned by Richard Branson
|
  
|
24 |
26.97% |
|
We will never know!
|
  
|
9 |
10.11% |
|
None of the Above
|
  
|
44 |
49.44% |
 |
|
05-03-2011, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
Posts: 2,555
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by caitydrew
If they wanted to target someone, Will and Kate would be on their list as would anyone that would cause world headlines. I don't know of anyone who doesn't know about Will and Kate's wedding - whether they like them, or think they are the hippest couple on the scene. Something happening to them would cause more attention WORLDWIDE than even if something happened to Charlie Sheen! (which is the top attention getter in the US and he's a winning warlock so no one could ever get him). Next best target here would be Lindsey Lohan I guess. Any gov't official other than a few senior cabinet or former presidents wouldn't create more Headlines than royal couple would.
I'm from the US and they are still all over here. Them possibly coming to Hollywood is even on CNN.
|
All over here in terms of the media. I think if AQ/OBL wanted to attack anyone in the world I don't think Will and Kate would be at the top of the list. If anything it'll be the Queen and perhaps Prince Charles.
Terrorist could care less about two young famous people marrying. They do care about killing a lot of souls at one time. If anything they would want to attack the "head" and that would be the Queen (if we're talking in terms of the royal family). I'm not saying Will and Kate can't be target but some people are making it seem like they would be the first, main target to be attacked. Hope I'm explaining this right.
__________________
I don't dream at night, I dream all day. I dream for a living. -Steven Spielberg
|
05-03-2011, 03:33 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
|
I don't think any royals would be target #1. If AQ targeted, they would go after the PM, Home Secretary, etc. However, it appears they don't actually target. It's more "get as many as you can with one device."
However, I could be dead wrong as in IRA/Louis Mountbatten.
|
05-03-2011, 03:56 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KittyAtlanta
I don't think any royals would be target #1. If AQ targeted, they would go after the PM, Home Secretary, etc. However, it appears they don't actually target. It's more "get as many as you can with one device."
However, I could be dead wrong as in IRA/Louis Mountbatten.
|
I just remember how quick they got Harry out of Afghanistan when it his location was disclosed.
|
05-03-2011, 04:17 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
|
Yes, it was quick and appropriate. He's 3rd in line. I wouldn't want my Secretary of State in a hot zone during a war (no matter who they are).
|
05-03-2011, 04:21 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 1,862
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KittyAtlanta
Yes, it was quick and appropriate. He's 3rd in line. I wouldn't want my Secretary of State in a hot zone during a war (no matter who they are).
|
Exactly- in America third '' in line'' is the Speaker of the House and agree I wouldn't expect him to be in a war zone at all (just in case).....
Not sure if this has been posted- US Weekly reporting Duke and Duchess went home to Wales ( why can i never remember the name of the town) for their 3 day '' getaway''.....
http://m.usmag.com/v/CelebNews/Where...62e7bb2d5961b0
|
05-03-2011, 05:11 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
Posts: 2,555
|
|
|
They were at home all this time! I wonder how true this is. I was so looking abroad that I didn't think they would spend it at home. :)
__________________
I don't dream at night, I dream all day. I dream for a living. -Steven Spielberg
|
05-08-2011, 12:13 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
|
|
05-08-2011, 12:57 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 14,105
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
I just remember how quick they got Harry out of Afghanistan when it his location was disclosed.
|
It took them about 6 weeks.
The New Idea made the revelation in January that year but it was another 6 weeks or more before he was removed after other media broke the story.
Not all that fast - 6 weeks really. I would have expected them to act far more quickly than that if they were truly worried.
|
05-08-2011, 09:10 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: -, France
Posts: 22,971
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost_night554
|
Im surprised the lactation has been revealed for any reason not just security but also privacy. In one of the articles it did mention that the press was not going to follow the couple but then I wonder if they would do so for the highest selling picture 
Do we know which island of the Seychelles they will be visiting?
|
05-08-2011, 10:36 AM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 1,862
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ghost_night554
|
it says they are stoppping at Desroches where that agreed to marry? What's that mean? Where they got engaged?
|
05-08-2011, 11:43 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 21,391
|
|
|
I was just going to say that Desroches is in the seychelles and I think it means that's where they made that "pact" of theirs.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|
05-08-2011, 01:05 PM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 27
|
|
|
Isn't it a bit inconsiderate to not show up for Zara's birthday if they've already RSVP'd?
|
05-08-2011, 03:34 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
|
I wonder if the palace will eventually confirm when they are on their honeymoon. If we go by the article then they should be there right if it's true.
|
05-09-2011, 03:13 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
|
|
05-09-2011, 03:35 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
|
Bermuda would be my choice. I love the people there.
|
05-09-2011, 04:31 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dazzling
Im surprised the lactation has been revealed for any reason not just security but also privacy. In one of the articles it did mention that the press was not going to follow the couple but then I wonder if they would do so for the highest selling picture
Do we know which island of the Seychelles they will be visiting? |
I dunno, is Desroches an island? They mention that place in the article as you can see I'm useless with geography. The Mail also revealed some details last Monday
William and Kate to honeymoon in Seychelles | LUXUO Luxury Blog
|
05-09-2011, 04:43 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 21,391
|
|
|
Desroches is, check wiki.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|
05-09-2011, 05:31 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
|
Ah ok thanks. See as I said I suck in Geography never quite paid too much attention to it at school.
|
05-10-2011, 02:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: -, France
Posts: 22,971
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost_night554
|
They did not reveal the location so I wonder if it is still the Seychelles
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
