royalistbert
Courtier
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2012
- Messages
- 798
- City
- Ipswich
- Country
- United Kingdom
I do wonder what source does the DM have about Carole moving in.
Charlotte is cute and fat with fat cheeks and lovely baby fat that just makes you want to kiss her all over.
On a related issue....to the woman on here who have had children, how long did you stay at the hospital? I think Kate didn't beat Victoria's time, but they seemed to be ready to go quite fast. So I was just wondering how it was dealt with by other women.
6 hrs and 8 hrs makes me wonder why doctors stopped making house calls. But then again it's probably best to be at a hospital in cSe of complocations with the baby or mom. Just recently I believe some woman had between a 60-76hr labor here in the states.
Those hours are post-birth and thus not including labour. I would imagine that if the woman had had a protracted labour they would stay longer but when it is a straight forward, normal birth then there is no real reason to stay in hospital.
People cannot seem to accept the fact that everyone is different. With my first child I could very well have done what Kate did. I had minimal medication/sedation and I think that makes a huge difference. As to the "surrogacy" theories I think that is just an excuse to make such comments because there were people saying that BEFORE she had George. It seems for some people if you are not enormous during your pregnancy then CERTAINLY you must have had a surrogate. Just more excuses to bad mouth Catherine, IMO.Those hours are post-birth and thus not including labour. I would imagine that if the woman had had a protracted labour they would stay longer but when it is a straight forward, normal birth then there is no real reason to stay in hospital.
As for the post-birth care. My niece had a nurse call in and see her about three hours after she arrived home and again the next morning and every morning for a week or so.
As for Kate walking out so soon - that is one of the arguments given to justify the 'surrogacy' theories that are all over the internet - especially on Royal Gossip and less so on Royal Dish.
People cannot seem to accept the fact that everyone is different. With my first child I could very well have done what Kate did. I had minimal medication/sedation and I think that makes a huge difference. As to the "surrogacy" theories I think that is just an excuse to make such comments because there were people saying that BEFORE she had George. It seems for some people if you are not enormous during your pregnancy then CERTAINLY you must have had a surrogate. Just more excuses to bad mouth Catherine, IMO.
Oh, yes, I realize we're talking post-birth. I think part of the reason it makes me slightly worried about leaving so soon is because when I was born, my mother was only in labor for 6 hours, and it was a straightforward, normal birth. However, my mother did have some relatively minor, non-life threatening complications afterward (although I don't think they were immediately apparent), and she ended up staying in the hospital for 6 days. I've also heard of cases where women developed complications at home but didn't realize how serious they were because they weren't accustomed to what's considered normal, whereas a medical professional would be. Of course, I realize a lot of people (especially royals) are surrounded with help of various kinds once they get home, be it a nurse or family members.
Edit to add: I see you added a couple of things - interesting about the post-birth care. I don't think it's the norm to have nurse check-ups at home in the US, which is perhaps why the hospital stays are longer.
Interesting about the conspiracy theories - do they have similar theories about other royal ladies who leave the hospital so soon? Because I know Kate's not the only one, but I realize a lot of people don't pay attention to other royal families.
I think most women with straightforward labours and no post partum complications could do what Kate did. Someone did her hair and makeup, she got dressed in the clothes someone else brought her, maybe walked to the hospital exit, (she could well have been pushed in a wheelchair up to then), stood outside with the baby and smiled for a minute or two before getting into the car and being driven to her home, where supportive family and staff were waiting to take care of her every need.
Edit to add: I see you added a couple of things - interesting about the post-birth care. I don't think it's the norm to have nurse check-ups at home in the US, which is perhaps why the hospital stays are longer.
Hospitals are great when and if you need them, but they are also full of superbugs which are resistant to antibiotics. The best thing is to give birth there, so if you have complications, you've got the best care available at hand. If everything goes well and you have support at home - the best is to go home as soon as your medical team says you can. You and your baby are at risk because you are both vulnerable. Sad, but true.
I thought Kaye wore flats when she left with George. And Kate wasn't that small in the last months before George was born, she looked like she had swallowed the great pumpkin, like most women do. Plus both times she has shown her stomach is still big after her babies were born.
Hospitals are great when and if you need them, but they are also full of superbugs which are resistant to antibiotics. The best thing is to give birth there, so if you have complications, you've got the best care available at hand. If everything goes well and you have support at home - the best is to go home as soon as your medical team says you can. You and your baby are at risk because you are both vulnerable. Sad, but true.
I used the term 'nurse' because I was under the impression (based on my sister-in-law who is a nurse and a midwife and couldn't become a midwife until she had completed her general nursing course) that midwives were also nurses.
I think they must have some kind of emergency equipment in the palaces for different cases, because some complications can't wait too long.Of course, I realize a lot of people (especially royals) are surrounded with help of various kinds once they get home, be it a nurse or family members.
Not necessarily in the UK. Most are but it's possible to only train as a midwife. A nurse does not have the skills, training or qualifications to perform the role of a midwife.
I stopped referring to myself as a nurse (I am an RN and RM) once I got my midwifery qualification.
I'm not knocking nurses. They just have very different skills. I could not do the work that a specialist ER nurse or theatre nurse or paediatric nurse etc can do. I simply didn't have the skills or training. I did agency nursing in the year before I left the profession and I was completely out of my depth caring for sick people after spending 15 years working in midwifery.
Again, I think it's a nationality thing. One of the reasons I left midwifery once I came to Australia was that I found it so frustrating that I couldn't work the way I had been trained.
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
I remember when Diana left the hospital with William there were murmurs that she had left too soon. It was 21 hours after she gave birth. With Harry it was much the same.
Anne was only in hospital for two days with Peter in 1977 (the same hospital of course)