The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #2621  
Old 04-17-2017, 09:45 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
According to an interview William did he discussed it with the Queen and she told him to get rid of the list he'd been given and for he and Kate to decide.


LaRae
Indeed. He was given some input instead of no input.
__________________

  #2622  
Old 04-17-2017, 09:46 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,310
Some? From the way William said it the Queen gave him carte blanche to determine the guest list. He asked her who he had to invite and he was told none of them (on the list).


LaRae
__________________

  #2623  
Old 04-17-2017, 09:55 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
Some? From the way William said it the Queen gave him carte blanche to determine the guest list. He asked her who he had to invite and he was told none of them (on the list).


LaRae
If William and Catherine only invited people they were close with it's strange that only about 200 of the 1000 guests made it to the couple's evening party. I also struggle to believe that the Cambridges are good friends with all the foreign royals that attended, or the government members of the 15 realms who attended, or the then current UK politicians who attended, or the UK religious leaders who attended, or all of the middle-age friends of Charles who attended, including Rowan Atkinson . Strange choices for a couple who has total carte blanche. But believe what you choose, I'll do the same.
  #2624  
Old 04-17-2017, 10:15 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
Very simple reasoning here. The church only holds so many people. The marquee at the Middletons will probably hold a lot more people hence Meghan attending the reception and not the ceremony. I've seen this done quite a few times both ways. Invited to the ceremony but not the reception as its a smaller venue or there is a ban on children and not invited to the church but to the reception to celebrate.

It makes a lot of sense to me actually. Meghan isn't close to Pippa and those are the people she wants at the actual ceremony.
But why single Meghan out? If her boyfriend is attending, then I'm sure there's room for her to attend with him. This is all based on if she's able to go period.

I'm looking forward to this wedding. Been waiting to see another Middleton get married. Next, all eyes will be on James and Donna.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #2625  
Old 04-17-2017, 10:38 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
But why single Meghan out? If her boyfriend is attending, then I'm sure there's room for her to attend with him. This is all based on if she's able to go period.

I'm looking forward to this wedding. Been waiting to see another Middleton get married. Next, all eyes will be on James and Donna.
Like other's have mentioned the church is small, there isn't room for filler seats (gf/bfs) when you are trying to cram in all your family and close friends.

Also it's not that common in the UK high society for a bf/gf to be given an invite. Both Percy daughters had large grand weddings, yet Pippa didn't get to bring Alex to Katie's wedding, and she didn't get to bring Nico to Missy's wedding. Tom Parker-Bowles had an extended family wedding that Catherine and Chelsy weren't invited to even though their boyfriends were there. Jack Brooksbank wasn't invited to either William or Zara's weddings even though he had been with Eugenie for over a year at that point.

Meghan getting an invite, even just to a reception, is rather abnormal, so I'm not sure why you're so surprised that Meghan might not be sitting in a pew.
  #2626  
Old 04-17-2017, 10:47 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,781
We also don't know that Meghan was the only person to get the invite with "reception only" on it. There could be multiple others.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #2627  
Old 04-17-2017, 10:51 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
Although I think some are over thinking these wedding invites, it should be a great day.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #2628  
Old 04-17-2017, 10:51 PM
cepe's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
But why single Meghan out? If her boyfriend is attending, then I'm sure there's room for her to attend with him. This is all based on if she's able to go period.

I'm looking forward to this wedding. Been waiting to see another Middleton get married. Next, all eyes will be on James and Donna.
No one is singling her out .

For all we know, IF there is a separation of invites, it is being applied to all cases.

She is the girlfriend of her brother-in-law's brother. That is way way beyond extended family and friends. In fact I don't supposed the Bride and Groom have even met her.

Frankly, Harry getting an invite surprised me!
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
  #2629  
Old 04-17-2017, 11:12 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by miss whirley View Post
If William and Catherine only invited people they were close with it's strange that only about 200 of the 1000 guests made it to the couple's evening party. I also struggle to believe that the Cambridges are good friends with all the foreign royals that attended, or the government members of the 15 realms who attended, or the then current UK politicians who attended, or the UK religious leaders who attended, or all of the middle-age friends of Charles who attended, including Rowan Atkinson . Strange choices for a couple who has total carte blanche. But believe what you choose, I'll do the same.

I never said 'only inviting the people they were close to'. The point was they clearly had control of the guest list. That doesn't mean they weren't going to invite certain folks...they do know protocol also.

All you need to do is look up the interview. I see no reason to think William was making it up.


LaRae
  #2630  
Old 04-17-2017, 11:15 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,817
I get the whole concept, though seems odd to me. Here you choose a venue that can hold the people you want to invite and they attend all. Only difference may be kids. Receptions are often adult only. But then again the three events is odd to me. You have the weddung and then you have the reception which is both the dinner and party. Maybe a cocktail hour before but usually part.

I get Meghan not being invited to the ceremony. But I also don't see her going just for the party. Even if that is the way things are done. We're not talking a day trip from London. To take a leave from filming to fly to the uk, to attend the party of a woman she has never met seems unlikely. Now if it was a close friend of Harry, my opinion may be different. Someone like Skippy and his wife will have a much more significant part in their future if she marries Harry than Pippa.

No ring no bring is kind of unspoken around here. Likely because having a plus one on your invite rarely if ever happens. If the person you are dating is not serious enough to name on the invitation, even if not engaged, then not serious enough to invite. The whole wedding date thing is impractical. Not only do you end up not knowing how many people will attend, bit then you end up with a whole bunch of people you don't know. It's a wedding, not a club night.
  #2631  
Old 04-17-2017, 11:25 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,781
With reading about the plans that Pippa has for "the" day, my thoughts went to picturing a church wedding with, in attendance, close family members and close friends of the couple. Then there's the afternoon party/dinner where the Middleton's business associates and Matthew's "obligatory" invites and the older aunts and uncles and great godmother Prudence come and toast the bride and the groom. Then... like with Will and Kate's wedding, the younger folks get to let their hair down and party hardy and the older folks are not sitting in some corner drooling in their champagne and nodding off to the land of Nod.

I can see kids being around for the afternoon event but whisked off to bed before the night time party begins. Its a way of fitting everyone in to enjoy at least part of Pippa and James' new life together.

We don't know specifically why Meghan would be in the UK for a week and to be honest, right now I'm leaning towards that its more speculation than an actual fact. It doesn't really matter when it comes to Pippa's wedding.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #2632  
Old 04-17-2017, 11:38 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
No one is singling her out .

For all we know, IF there is a separation of invites, it is being applied to all cases.

She is the girlfriend of her brother-in-law's brother. That is way way beyond extended family and friends. In fact I don't supposed the Bride and Groom have even met her.

Frankly, Harry getting an invite surprised me!
Remember, Pippa has known Harry for years. Since Catherine started dating William and they got to know his family. Harry is part of their family too. They're not strangers to each other. I'm not surprised by his wedding invite at all.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #2633  
Old 04-17-2017, 11:56 PM
HRHHermione's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 2,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
Remember, Pippa has known Harry for years. Since Catherine started dating William and they got to know his family. Harry is part of their family too. They're not strangers to each other. I'm not surprised by his wedding invite at all.


I was surprised at all the folks that seem to think the Middletons have no connection to Harry. He's known Kate nearly as long as William has and she and Pippa are close. They share friends. I'd have been shocked if Harry wasn't invited.
  #2634  
Old 04-18-2017, 01:03 AM
hel hel is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Posts: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by HRHHermione View Post
I was surprised at all the folks that seem to think the Middletons have no connection to Harry. He's known Kate nearly as long as William has and she and Pippa are close. They share friends. I'd have been shocked if Harry wasn't invited.
Not least because Pippa almost certainly would never damage her own chances of being invited to Harry's wedding by failing to invite him to hers. Which, TBH, is why I believe that Meghan got an invitation to the ceremony, reception, and party; there's a non-zero chance that the bride in question at Harry's wedding will be Meghan.
  #2635  
Old 04-19-2017, 01:55 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,908
Pippa and Carole on the cover of Point De View magazine

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9yyFwKWAAYhmzp.jpg
  #2636  
Old 04-19-2017, 02:30 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 2,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by hel View Post
Not least because Pippa almost certainly would never damage her own chances of being invited to Harry's wedding by failing to invite him to hers. Which, TBH, is why I believe that Meghan got an invitation to the ceremony, reception, and party; there's a non-zero chance that the bride in question at Harry's wedding will be Meghan.

If you know a prince, you invite him to your wedding! (I certainly would)
__________________
"If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will.”

Abraham Lincoln
  #2637  
Old 04-19-2017, 02:34 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,781
I don't think that there's really any ulterior motive to inviting Harry to Pippa's wedding. With the closeness of family, I'd be very surprised even if Pippa still regarded Harry as Prince rather than just Harry who is her sister's brother-in-law.

When these people get together, they are not seeing Prince, Earl, Countess or any title but actually seeing and interacting with these people as real, live human beings.

I would think its pretty much a given that should Harry marry, Pippa and James Matthews would be a couple on the invite list.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #2638  
Old 04-19-2017, 05:40 PM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,034
Does anyone other than me think that either:
1. Pippa simply asked Harry if he wanted to come, and if he wanted a plus one. OR
2. Pippa asked Kate to ask Harry the same thing.

And then let the answer guide the choice? Because that's how I would have handled it if my Sister were the future Queen and I knew my brother in law, but we were not necessarily texting all the time. And of course if there were just public "issues" no matter what one did. JMO
__________________
"And the tabloid press will be a pain in the ass, as usual." - Royal Norway
  #2639  
Old 04-19-2017, 06:00 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,781
One of the best observations I've seen in a long time. With Pippa and Kate being sisters, you have to know that they're in cahoots about anything wedding just as Pippa was right by Kate for her wedding. Its what sisters do.

Most likely the scenario you've presented is exactly what happened.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #2640  
Old 04-19-2017, 06:18 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 5,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmirerUS View Post
Does anyone other than me think that either:
1. Pippa simply asked Harry if he wanted to come, and if he wanted a plus one. OR
2. Pippa asked Kate to ask Harry the same thing.

And then let the answer guide the choice? Because that's how I would have handled it if my Sister were the future Queen and I knew my brother in law, but we were not necessarily texting all the time. And of course if there were just public "issues" no matter what one did. JMO

Well-said!

So much that has been said about the no ring, no bring is just the tabloids guessing, imo. I think Pippa would have handled things the way you described.
__________________

Closed Thread

Tags
duke and duchess of cambridge, kate middleton, new york, pippa middleton


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wedding of Pippa Middleton and James Matthews: May 20, 2017 Spheno Weddings: Non-Reigning Houses & Nobility 453 05-25-2021 07:40 PM




Popular Tags
america american archie mountbatten-windsor asia asian british british royal family camilla camilla's family camilla parker bowles carolin china china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing chinese clarence house colorblindness commonwealth countries crown jewels customs daisy doge of venice dresses duchess of sussex duke of sussex edward vii family tree genetics gradenigo harry and meghan hello! highgrove history hochberg house of windsor hypothetical monarchs japan japanese imperial family japan history jewellery kensington palace king edward vii king juan carlos książ castle liechtenstein lili mountbatten-windsor line of succession list of rulers meghan markle monarchist movements monarchists monarchy mongolia pless politics portugal prince harry queen elizabeth ii queen victoria royal ancestry solomon j solomon spanish royal family st edward sussex suthida thai royal family tradition unfinished portrait united states united states of america welsh


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×