someonelikeyou
Gentry
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2011
- Messages
- 84
- City
- Eastern Seaboard
- Country
- United States
Oh that is much better! Thank you!!
Where do you go from the homepage for the Reuters stream?? I am confused...
Oh that is much better! Thank you!!
When will these wretched papers stop giving her name as "Middleton"!
Where do you go from the homepage for the Reuters stream?? I am confused...
I think you may be right Gracie!... Press and public will not be alerted until police satisfied area is secure and all personnel in place (and Kate has been safely tucked into her suite).
A c-section is major abdominal surgery with all the inherent risks that entails, including blot clots, stroke and even death. It's not just another way to have a baby. It should not be performed for convenience. I've had babies both ways (the c/s due to fetal and maternal distress - severe pre-eclampsia - that nearly killed both of us) and nature's way is much better! I was moving around just fine after my natural births but the c/s was a much longer recovery. Just sayin'...A friend of mine who is a pediatrician had an elective C-section. She said it was less stress and less risk for the infant. I'm no expert but ... well, she is.
The reuters stream has been down since bout 7pm BST. the telegraph one ends at 11pm BST!
It's actually quite common in the NY area. People do it for religious reasons, medical reasons, and for tax reasons frankly (A child born on 12/31 vs 1/1 has an extra year's deduction which can be big $), if the baby is getting very big, etc.
I've said it before, saying it again, induction should not be used for anything other than medical reasons. For convenience is not a medical reason.
I can think of a reason to be born on Christmas if you are a royal: You can have the name Cristabel as Princess Alice did...and another royal as well, was it Princess Alexandra?
A c-section is major abdominal surgery with all the inherent risks that entails, including blot clots, stroke and even death. It's not just another way to have a baby. It should not be performed for convenience. I've had babies both ways (the c/s due to fetal and maternal distress - severe pre-eclampsia - that nearly killed both of us) and nature's way is much better! I was moving around just fine after my natural births but the c/s was a much longer recovery. Just sayin'...
KHOU News Houston (CBS) just reported Kate was on the way to hospital in labor. I don't believe anything anymore.
A c-section is major abdominal surgery with all the inherent risks that entails, including blot clots, stroke and even death. It's not just another way to have a baby. It should not be performed for convenience. I've had babies both ways (the c/s due to fetal and maternal distress - severe pre-eclampsia - that nearly killed both of us) and nature's way is much better! I was moving around just fine after my natural births but the c/s was a much longer recovery. Just sayin'...
Thank you! We're both fine. My c/s was 24 years ago. My daughter was born at 30 wks. and weighed 1310g (2lbs 14oz). She is now a beautiful young woman who is working with animals as she's wanted to do since she was three years old. My natural births (my first and third) were 8lbs 4oz and 10lbs 9oz. The ten-pounder was actually the easiest delivery of the three!I am thankful you and your children are OK.
Perhaps all of this hype is really an attempt to break us...
It seems to be working.
For all we know the baby could have been born late this evening. It won't be made public until the Queen has been told, and they wouldn't disturb her late at night.
For all we know the baby could have been born late this evening. It won't be made public until the Queen has been told, and they wouldn't disturb her late at night.
The Palace has said that they'll announce when she has gone into the hospital. So if she were there now, we would know. It's the actual birth announcement that what won't be made public until the Queen is notified.