QMII: The gown is beautiful and so is the pearl poire parure, but we've seen that exact combination only recently, so why again? I know, cost of living crisis, Ukraine,... but still, it's not like she doesn't have any other grand tiara.
CPss Mary: Absolutely love to see that dress again, it's fabulous and she should wear it more often, I know I would. Unfortunately, of 3 tiaras that she has, this one (although superb) is the only one that's grand enough for this occasion. But why doesn't QMII lend Mary one of her tiaras? I know there are jewels reserved for a queen only (perhaps emerald parure and other major Rosenborg Slot jewels, pearl poare, probably floral aigrette, Naasut parure), but what about Baden palmette tiara? Mary would rock it. She needs something a bit less grand then the ruby tiara, but still grand enough. Other queens lend some of their jewels to their daughters(-in-law).
Pss Benedikte - lovely as always.
Has anyone seen countess Susie and count Ingolf? I always love seeing them at royal events.
