 |
|

03-31-2012, 06:57 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 15
|
|
Yes, I know that this was the result of a plebiscite or something like that, but I think it comes from the King. Thank you:)
It is very interesting to know what was thes attitude of Knud to this fact
|

03-31-2012, 07:06 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Funen, Denmark
Posts: 794
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alira
Does anyone know what kind of relationship does Queen Margrethe have with Ingolf and Christian??
|
From what we see in magazines and on TV: The brothers are normally invited along to family events like the 'big' birthdays and anniversaries. Christian more often so than Ingolf, because he lives in the Copenhagen area! I don't think it's a particularly close relationship, but a relationship it is!
Quote:
Originally Posted by alira
And does anybody know the reaction of Knud when Frederitck decided to change the law of succession?
|
King Frederik never decided to change the law of succession; the Danish parliament did  ! Anyway, Knud didn't take it well at all and the relationship between Knud and King Frederik deteriorated! Each of Knud's three children have told this publicly, but they insist in being very civil about it and letting bygoing be bygones.
viv
|

03-31-2012, 07:51 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 15
|
|
Viv,Thank you for your answer.
Q: People voted for change in the law. Does a king? Why did it started a poll?
Q2: Why do not people support the Knud? What did he do wrong?
And more
I read on the forum that he was stupid, and so people did not want to see him as a king. Is it like this :: (
|

03-31-2012, 07:56 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 3,331
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alira
Q: People voted for change in the law. Does a king? Why did it started a poll?
|
The change of the law of succession became a issue when King Frederik didn't have any sons and he needed a successor, I believe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alira
Q2: Why do not people support the Knud? What did he do wrong?
|
I can't say if people didn't like Knud and his family, but I have no reason to believe they disliked the family in any way. I guess it just seemed more right to let Margrethe, the eldest daughter of the regent, follow in her father's footsteps.
__________________
"Hope is like the sun. If you only believe it when you see it you'll never make it through the night."
— Our Princess
|

03-31-2012, 08:21 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 15
|
|
Archduchess Zelia,but why is Margrethe?
You write that the law was not changed by the will of the king, but by the will of the people. But why Knud? Why did this no one thought?
Why law has not changed before?
I did feel very sorry about him, I think it's terrible to grow and know that you will become king, and then lose it all: (
|

03-31-2012, 08:29 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 3,331
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alira
Archduchess Zelia,but why is Margrethe?
You write that the law was not changed by the will of the king, but by the will of the people. But why Knud? Why did this no one thought?
Why law has not changed before?
I did feel very sorry about him, I think it's terrible to grow and know that you will become king, and then lose it all: (
|
Because Margrethe was the King's daughter and Knud was "just" his brother. I believe some people voted no to Margrethe, but overall most people wanted her to be her father's successor.
I don't think Knud grew up to think he was to become King, I believe everyone thought that King Frederik and Queen Ingrid would have a son, but since they didn't it was chosen by the Danes that Margrethe should be the heir.
__________________
"Hope is like the sun. If you only believe it when you see it you'll never make it through the night."
— Our Princess
|

03-31-2012, 10:06 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cambridge, United States
Posts: 1,313
|
|
The counts are sons of hereditary prince knud so are they and their families still able to attend royal events.
__________________
" An ugly baby is a very nasty object, and the prettiest is frightful when undressed."
- Queen Victoria
|

03-31-2012, 11:29 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,276
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandduchess24
The counts are sons of hereditary prince knud so are they and their families still able to attend royal events.
|
Yes, and they have been guests at the royal weddings of Joachim & Frederik, and the QMII's birthday and jubilee celebrations.
|

04-01-2012, 02:41 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 16,105
|
|
The answers to your questions Alira are pretty complicated and also shrowded somewhat in hearsay.
It became clear by the late 1940's that King Frederik and Queen Ingrid would not have more children. Queen Ingrid was actually warned against having more children IRRC.
By the same time the political landscape has shifted. The Communists had won a huge victory after WWII, partly as a reaction to the stablished parties policy of collaboration with German until 1943.
The future of the monarchy was by no means secure, even if the royals themselves were personally well liked.
It wasn't just King Christian X riding through the streets of Copenhagen, who became a strong national symbol - also among those who vote Communist. Also the then CP couple, Frederik and Ingrid, with their little family became strong symbols during WWII. Margrethe who was born a few days after the German occupation wasn't for anything described as "a light in the dark".
In other words many were against the monarchy as an establishment, but there were nevertheless many feelings for the individuals in the DRF.
Queen Ingrid and King Frederik was a likable, nice family. That is one of the reasons why M&F are so much compared to them.
But according to the Law of Succession, Princess Margrethe was to be bypassed by Prince Knud's children.
Prince Knud was for whatever reason not particular popular and at least among those I have spoken with, who were around at the time, he and his children were not considered very bright. I don't know if that is true, but that was certainly the perception.
And perhaps even more convincing, they are not the most beautiful people around either.
So the arguments were:
A) Should such persons represent Denmark as the first family, when we have a better alternative?
B) It's unfair against Princess Margrethe and her family.
C) Why shouldn't women have equal rights to a position?
D) It's time for a change of the Constitution anyway, let's link it to something popular and something that will get people to go and vote.
That caused Prince Knud to be very dissapointed, very understandebly perhaps and it let to a lot of resentment towards King Frederik.
That seems to have passed now. Prince Knud's children are not close to the DRF but they are not alien either.
Joachim and Prince Ingolf for example have en excellent relationship.
|

04-01-2012, 04:04 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,969
|
|
I heard from elder family members that it was generally believed at the time that queen Ingrid advocated the change in the succession intensely and that there was some resentment on Knud's part against her for this - that this was the impression people had.
Funny thing is - if Knud and his children had entered the succession: Ingolf has had no children, his older sister has never married and had children. The only children in that family are the three girls of the youngest brother Christian - twin girls and a younger sister.
So, if the purpose of any pro Knud camp was to avoid female succession they would only have postponed the 'inevitable' for one generation.
__________________
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil, and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
|

04-01-2012, 04:57 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 6,755
|
|
Here is an interesting article about the Change of the succession law and the realtions between the 2 famlies by historican Trond Norén Isaksen
Trond Norén Isaksen: The man who would be king
__________________
Stefan
|

04-01-2012, 05:18 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,969
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefan
|
Interesting, thank you Stefan.
I didn't know that Ingolf had played such an active part in reconciling the two branches of the family.
I suppose one shouldn't judge prince Knud's reaction to the change of succession by today's norms - but still, it is strange to our modern concept of things that he should feel this bitter because the regent's own child was given the opportunity to succeed the king.
__________________
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil, and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
|

04-01-2012, 05:19 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 16,105
|
|
Thanks, Stefan 
An interesting article.
It's also a testament on how times have changed, from a time where becoming a king was an ambition, to our time where becoming a king is a duty.
|

04-01-2012, 07:11 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|
I've been wondering about this change as well, and especially Prince Knud's reaction to it.
Thanks a lot for the most detailed and interesting answers Viv, Zelia, Muhler, UserDane, and Stefan!
|

04-01-2012, 09:32 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 15
|
|
Muhler,UserDane,Stefan,thank you for such interesting information!
Despite the fact that I believe that Margrethe is great queen, I feel very sorry about Knud and his unfulfilled dream.
And it's very good that Ingolf could reconcile with his family .
The brothers are involved in public life? Do they have a public office or smth. like that?
|

04-01-2012, 03:09 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 7,478
|
|
Very interesting thread and informations.
Is it true that their sister Princess Elisabeth never marries because she did not want to loose her title of royal Highness ?
|

04-01-2012, 03:14 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 16,105
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maria-olivia
Very interesting thread and informations.
Is it true that their sister Princess Elisabeth never marries because she did not want to loose her title of royal Highness ?
|
It's my impression that Princess Elizabeth is not the marrying kind.
Alira. I think FasterB can answer your questions.
|

04-01-2012, 04:34 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,969
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maria-olivia
Very interesting thread and informations.
Is it true that their sister Princess Elisabeth never marries because she did not want to loose her title of royal Highness ?
|
It has been mentioned in the media during the years - but whether it's correct, I don't know.
In this article from the tabloid BT - BT - it is said that the princess honestly admits that she loves the big royal parties and getting invited to them in her capacity as a princess and that this should be part of the reason why she hasn't married.
She hasn't lived her life as a single all the time though. She lived together with photographer and director Claus Hermansen for more than 20 years till he died in the late 90's.
__________________
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil, and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
|

04-01-2012, 04:53 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,442
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maria-olivia
Very interesting thread and informations.
Is it true that their sister Princess Elisabeth never marries because she did not want to loose her title of royal Highness ?
|
HRH Princess Elisabeth has herself stated in an interview in Billed Bladet that she never got married to her lifelonglove Claus, because she didn´t want to give up the HRH Princess title
IIRC then her wording was: "Dén skulle de ikke have" (Muhler, I don´t know how to translate this, can you help?  )
__________________
Where charity and love are, God is there.
Candidata Theologiae / Master in Theology
|

04-01-2012, 05:00 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 16,105
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FasterB
HRH Princess Elisabeth has herself stated in an interview in Billed Bladet that she never got married to her lifelonglove Claus, because she didn´t want to give up the HRH Princess title
IIRC then her wording was: "Dén skulle de ikke have" (Muhler, I don´t know how to translate this, can you help?  )
|
Sure. 
It can best be translated as: "They weren't going to take that (her title) away from me".
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|