 |
|
12-19-2020, 09:44 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: london, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,761
|
|
|
Hopefully it will turn out he isn’t the father, if he is he is a very silly spoilt man
And a lot of people will be disappointed in him, for denying this child, also for not learning from the past.
|
12-19-2020, 09:45 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 8,725
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by melina premiere
The lawyer sid that Albert will not go to the court , he is covered by his diplomatic immunity , he will be represented by his lawyer
For me, there are no proof and facts around a so called trip, no intimate photos nor tangible facts around this so called Relationship
I believed that the rumors of tabloïds were not allowed on the royal forums and all the comments about them were cancelled
|
The fact that his lawyer responded and a court hearing is scheduled in court means that it is not at 'tabloid' level, so fully allowable to discuss on this forum.
You are of course free to believe Albert who has proven to be denying even when he knows that he is likely the father of a child. I don't think he or his lawyer can be trusted in this respect (like the other Albert and his lawyer couldn't be trusted in the case of Delphine) as he has a vested interest in denying (another example in the royal world is Nicholas - grandson of the king of Romania; he also kept denying and frustrating due process and trying to blame the mother while he knew that it was very likely to be true; which (no surprise) was proven to be the case).
Whether Albert truly is the father can be easily proven by a DNA-test, so if she is able to provide some evidence that he might be her daughter's father and he still keeps fighting against a DNA-test (in public he denied that Jazmin was his daughter for 14 years!), he is more likely 'guilty as charged' than not. Unfortunately, his past doesn't speak in his favor. Nonetheless, we'll have to wait for the DNA-test results to know whether he truly has another out-of-wedlock child. Of course, it is not unthinkable either that someone is trying to exhort Albert but going to court means that the risk of being found a liar (if you know to be one) is rather high because -again- a DNA-test would easily proof that... So, it would be very unwise of this lady to go that route if there is indeed no basis for her claims.
|
12-19-2020, 02:56 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 486
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by miss whirley
I remember when Lacoste tried to play down the Jazmin rumors. Ironically, once the Prince finally acknowledged Jazmin, it was Lacoste who developed more of bond with her. Albert still seemed hesitant to interact much with Jazmin, so it was Lacoste that showed her around Paris and Monaco. I'll laugh if Lacoste ends up playing dad to this child too.
I do find it interesting that in all this whining about this woman threatening him, he doesn't say Albert never met her. And he doesn't say Albert never had sex with her. If Albert has nothing to hide he shouldn't feel so threatened by a request for a DNA test.
|
No wonder Princess Charlene shaved her hair ...
|
12-19-2020, 02:58 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 37,862
|
|
|
Another Albert II paternity test ,lets hope its handled better than his Belgian names sake.
|
12-19-2020, 04:03 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,015
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by titiromi
No wonder Princess Charlene shaved her hair ...
|
I wouldn't have thought so. The girl (if his) was conceived in 2004 so before his relationship with Charlene was rekindled. The media would love for it to have been later than that but unfortunately for them it wasn't.
|
12-19-2020, 04:51 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sherwood, United States
Posts: 867
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by titiromi
No wonder Princess Charlene shaved her hair ...
|
I kinda feel the same way. I don't think the timeline really matters that much. At this point she's probably fed up with the serial philanderer and concerned for her own children.
|
12-19-2020, 05:22 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: tacoma, United States
Posts: 637
|
|
|
If there is really a third child,? this was really his choice. He could have kept his pants zipped, or wear it around his ankle's he decided on door number 2, ankles. Maybe the dear man never knew what a condom is?, who knows. I just feel sorry for Pss Charlene and the sweet twins. Albert is now 62 years old, hope he is a bit smarter and not go on impulse.
|
12-19-2020, 05:36 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,015
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REAL COUNTESS
If there is really a third child,? this was really his choice. He could have kept his pants zipped, or wear it around his ankle's he decided on door number 2, ankles. Maybe the dear man never knew what a condom is?, who knows. I just feel sorry for Pss Charlene and the sweet twins. Albert is now 62 years old, hope he is a bit smarter and not go on impulse.
|
I agree with you but the ladies in question also seem to have happily indulged without the necessary requirements. I am sure they were also aware of what a condom is but clearly chose not to use one.
|
12-19-2020, 06:25 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 486
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophie25
I wouldn't have thought so. The girl (if his) was conceived in 2004 so before his relationship with Charlene was rekindled. The media would love for it to have been later than that but unfortunately for them it wasn't.
|
Yes but chances are that she has not heard about it before. I would be sad if my husband has hidden me a 3rd child born out of wedlock that I was not aware of.
|
12-19-2020, 07:13 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,015
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by titiromi
Yes but chances are that she has not heard about it before. I would be sad if my husband has hidden me a 3rd child born out of wedlock that I was not aware of.
|
Well I heard about this months ago so I can't see why PC or PA would be surprised about it one bit.
|
12-20-2020, 03:46 AM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LONDON, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,230
|
|
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...-Margaret.html
DNA will provide the answer one way or another.
When Princess Margaret married Tony Armstrong-Jones in May, 1960, his best friend's wife was expecting a baby girl; delivered I think after Margaret's wedding.
DNA revealed Tony-Armstrong Jones was the father. Tony's own father said the marriage would never last.
Margaret never knew or found out about this. Tony was a real cad!!
As regards Prince Albert, if true, I think money will change hands; but a relationship will depend on Albert.
|
12-20-2020, 11:34 AM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: -, Greece
Posts: 23,485
|
|
Princess Charlene posted some Polaroid pictures of a family's Saloon visit
https://www.instagram.com/p/CJBpqLYF9J3/
|
12-20-2020, 01:47 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: tacoma, United States
Posts: 637
|
|
|
Not to spoil any ones day, but why in the world are some people not satisfied whit what they have and believe the grass is greener on the other side of the fence? Maybe being spoiled and believe they are more entitled then others. Their EGO must not fit in to their pocket.
|
12-20-2020, 02:29 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,015
|
|
|
Any picture of their 2020 Christmas card yet? I hope she doesn't have that horrible shaved head in it.
|
12-20-2020, 06:10 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 13,871
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eya
|
Such sweet photos!
__________________
"For beautiful eyes, look for the good in others; for beautiful lips, speak only words of kindness; and for poise, walk with the knowledge that you are never alone". Audrey Hepburn
*
"Think of all the beauty still left around you and be happy". Anne Frank
|
12-21-2020, 06:00 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sassenage, France
Posts: 3,864
|
|
|
Nice photos
I Believe it was during the birthday of Prince Jacques and princess Gabriella at Roc Agel
|
12-21-2020, 06:44 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 37,862
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophie25
Any picture of their 2020 Christmas card yet?
|
I was just thinking I hadn't seen this years Christmas card.
|
12-22-2020, 11:26 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Coimbra, Portugal
Posts: 185
|
|
|
I’m sorry if this sounds a little aggressive but I can’t help but wonder what is wrong with Albert. If he doesn’t want children from a one night stand, that’s perfectly understandable, but he should know better than to trust his lovers. I’m not saying the pregnancies were premeditated but it’s better to be safe than sorry. If he didn’t want those relationships to result in pregnancy, he should’ve have taken the matter into his own hands and made sure he had protection at the time. Simple as that.
|
12-22-2020, 01:03 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: tacoma, United States
Posts: 637
|
|
|
Let me put my opinion in here please. Before the pandemic I and a friend met about once a month for coffee . There were two women talking, one of them said, see a women as a Batterie in your phone or Laptop, it runs until the Batterie needs charging. So for it to do this it needs an outlet and a plug. Female outlet, male plug the other women said yes I get it. So one without the other don't work. It seemed the outlet was more then willing to except the plug? Just because the women offers, the man don't need to except it. Maybe the outlet expected more then a short charge.?
|
12-23-2020, 06:39 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 3,714
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by palomasie
I’m sorry if this sounds a little aggressive but I can’t help but wonder what is wrong with Albert. If he doesn’t want children from a one night stand, that’s perfectly understandable, but he should know better than to trust his lovers. I’m not saying the pregnancies were premeditated but it’s better to be safe than sorry. If he didn’t want those relationships to result in pregnancy, he should’ve have taken the matter into his own hands and made sure he had protection at the time. Simple as that.
|
Agreed.
He is lucky that illegitimate children are all he's gotten from these one night stands and not HIV/AIDS.
__________________
Those who plot the destruction of others often perish in the attempt. ---Phaedrus
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
