The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #141  
Old 09-12-2018, 08:35 AM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 9,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 View Post
There were some in the Swedish press that bent over backward to promote this young woman....one in particular was so rabidly pro Sofia I occasionally wondered if he was on the payroll.

As for social media...well yeah. What did she expect?

She still got fields of roses compared to poor Daniel.
I think there was more going on with the years Victoria had to wait for permission to marry a sweet, loving, educated and self-made man. And, I also believe that if he wasn't a CP in his own right he would have been as unacceptable as Daniel.
__________________

__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 09-12-2018, 08:35 AM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMD View Post
I wonder how many were relieved to lose their place in succession, and have more privacy and personal freedom? Or do they also lose much more than a title such as privilege, allowances, residence etc? I heard that Princess Margaret of GB
was not prepared to relinquish her title and lifestyle for Peter Townsend, although there were other considerations.
I think Margaret thought things would go on as they had for years - very old school life of a royal without a lot of hard work required of the non-monarch. Just hang out and look cute. She lacked the imagination to see that things always do change and not usually in one's favor, unless one strives for things that matter to the public. I've always thought her interpersonally crafty, but not the brightest bulb in the bunch.
__________________

__________________
"And the tabloid press will be a pain in the ass, as usual." - Royal Norway
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 09-12-2018, 09:26 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmirerUS View Post
I think Margaret thought things would go on as they had for years - very old school life of a royal without a lot of hard work required of the non-monarch. Just hang out and look cute. She lacked the imagination to see that things always do change and not usually in one's favor, unless one strives for things that matter to the public. I've always thought her interpersonally crafty, but not the brightest bulb in the bunch.
The Queen was front and center and felt the profound change in the way people viewed monarchy. Her hand was forced a bit on some of the changes she's had to make as society changed. Margaret was far more out of touch, which isn't surprising. Margaret has always seemed to me quite spoiled and sheltered from real life and consequences. As for the Peter Townsend situation, I don't know how much of it was duty versus she realized the reality of her life if she marries him, and decided that wasn't for her. Hurting the monarchy did not stop her from doing a number of things after that.
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 09-12-2018, 10:33 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 View Post
There were some in the Swedish press that bent over backward to promote this young woman....one in particular was so rabidly pro Sofia I occasionally wondered if he was on the payroll.

As for social media...well yeah. What did she expect?

She still got fields of roses compared to poor Daniel.
Well, what would you expect?

It really goes beyond normal or even polite what some have accused her of or slung at her. Even some people here.

And I don't think Daniel was that "poor" at all, Victoria's position is starkly different from Carl Philip's, so her spouse had much more boxes to tick and prove that he was suitable material in the long run.
On paper he looks like a dream guy, but he had to prove that the paperwork also translated into practical work. That is what a lot of people seem to forget here. He proved that his paperwork was practical as well, so he and Victoria were allowed to marry.

Vice versa for Sofia - her paperwork was, depending how you look at it, less than stellar and apparently she proved that her practical work was better. Or at least had gotten better over the years. I suppose she's always been a free spirit.
Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 09-12-2018, 12:45 PM
PrincessElena's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -, Hungary
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muhler View Post
Don't worry.
It was only an outrageous example I made up to illustrate a point.
That's why I ended it with this:

I doubt Mary has ever cut off the heads of budgies - with scissors.

Oh thank heavens! My bad I took your words literally!
Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 09-12-2018, 01:49 PM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 10,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
Well, what would you expect?

It really goes beyond normal or even polite what some have accused her of or slung at her. Even some people here.

And I don't think Daniel was that "poor" at all, Victoria's position is starkly different from Carl Philip's, so her spouse had much more boxes to tick and prove that he was suitable material in the long run.
On paper he looks like a dream guy, but he had to prove that the paperwork also translated into practical work. That is what a lot of people seem to forget here. He proved that his paperwork was practical as well, so he and Victoria were allowed to marry.

Vice versa for Sofia - her paperwork was, depending how you look at it, less than stellar and apparently she proved that her practical work was better. Or at least had gotten better over the years. I suppose she's always been a free spirit.
Well, for starters Skippy I would probably not have ever shared the dicey details of my personal life on social media, including but not limited to, rhapsodizing about what it's like to have carnal relations on ice and what it feels like to make out with a porn star. And after realizing that there were photographs of myself online that could be construed as immodest enough to be banned from certain message boards and that the Swedish Court felt compelled to "scrub clean" I would not have expected the Audrey Hepburn treatment just because I had gone and bagged myself a Royal Prince.

I would have just kept my mouth shut and proven myself with what you refer to as "practical work"...letting the results speak for itself.

Minus the whinging and complaining about unfair treatment.

But that's just me.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice". Martin Luther King Jr. 1929-1968
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 09-12-2018, 01:52 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 6,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMD View Post
I wonder how many were relieved to lose their place in succession, and have more privacy and personal freedom?

I don't thnk they would give up their place in the line of succession if they had the option to keep it. On the contrary, some actually tried to get their title and rank back as Sigvard Bernadotte, who even went to the European Court of Human Rights to have hs princely status recognized by the Swedish government. There is a great deal of myth IMHO about royals resenting a lack of privacy and personal freedom. Especially when it comes to cadet children of monarchs, it seems to me that their perks tend to outnumber their obligations or the intrusion in their private lives.


There is indeed an issue, however, with royal marriages requiring official consent, which may be seen as a restriction of personal freedom (in this case, the freedom to marry whoever you choose). The consent requirement itself is understandable in my opinion, considering that the issue of those marriages will be in the line of succession to the throne. Nevertheless, maybe the current British model of limiting the consent requirement only to the first six persons in line makes more sense as it is very unlikely that someone lower than sxth place will ever ascend the throne anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 09-12-2018, 03:38 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 View Post
Well, for starters Skippy I would probably not have never shared the dicey details of my personal life on social media, including but not limited to, rhapsodizing about what it's like to have carnal relations on ice and what if feels like to make out with a porn star. And after realizing that there were photographs of myself online that could be construed as immodest enough to be banned from certain message boards and that the Swedish Court felt compelled to "scrub clean" I would not have expected the Audrey Hepburn treatment just because I had gone and bagged myself a Royal Prince.

I would have just kept my mouth shut and proven myself with what you refer to as "practical work"...letting the results speak for themselves.

Minus the whinging and complaining about unfair treatment.

But that's just me.
I would not do all those things either, I am with you about that, but I won't sling anonymous mud at someone (a then-future royal in this case) online because of them having done it and talking about it. Calling them names and stuff - it's happened.
Not here perse but some folks online have been really mean about her. Only because they disagree with her past and there the differing viewpoints come along.

It was not the smartest thing to do but she has - elsewhere - only just escaped crucification. I guess that she hoped that online life had also moved with the times and not dredge up something from years ago.

She's learnt a hard lesson with that, is my take. And it was naive, Internet never erases.
She could have acknowledged that she understood the concerns about her past but that she moved on from it a long time ago and all the rest she said.
That would couple both sides (public view and her own viewpoint) - with the approach that she took I can imagine that it stung for some people.

And now I believe I have said all I wanted to say about it
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 09-12-2018, 09:44 PM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 10,085
You make excellent points and yes, that would have been a great way for Sofia to have handled herself.

Thank you Skippy.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice". Martin Luther King Jr. 1929-1968
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 09-12-2018, 10:17 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 2,762
With few exceptions, everyone makes mistakes in life; sometimes they are horrible, cruel mistakes which hurt others terribly. Sometimes they are foolish, naive, and selfish mistakes made in the blithe ignorance of youth, and which are hurting only yourself.

When you are 20 years old, you unthinkingly do things that you can’t imagine will affect your future. But if you are just an ordinary “sinner”, at some point you mend your foolish ways and begin being the kind of person you were intended to be: self-aware, kind, wholesomely ambitious, and anxious to live a good life.

This is the transition Sofia has gone through. By a wonderful stroke of luck, she fell in love with a special man, and he fell in love with her. I can’t imagine anyone still obsessing over her party girl past.
__________________

__________________
"If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will.”

Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Royal-Royal Marriages Today Hereditary Mapmaker Royalty Past, Present, and Future 124 11-25-2019 01:09 AM
Shortest Royal Marriages HMTLove23 Royal Weddings General Discussion 23 10-29-2019 03:37 PM
Royal Marriages: Biggest Age Difference HMTLove23 Royalty Past, Present, and Future 29 01-09-2015 07:12 PM
European/Japan royal marriages Australian Imperial Family of Japan 37 03-19-2013 07:32 PM
The Royal Marriages Act of 1772 and Royal Marriages branchg British Royals 99 12-31-2012 09:24 PM




Popular Tags
abdication anastasia 2020 baby names bangladesh biography bridal gown brownbitcoinqueen canada chittagong cht clarence house coronavirus dna dragons dubai dutch royal family earl of snowdon emperor facts fantasy movie general news thread george vi hill historical drama history house of grimaldi italian royal family jewellery jumma kent languages list of rulers luxembourg mail mary: crown princess of denmark mbs mountbatten nepalese royal jewels northern ireland norway norway history palestine popularity prince daniel prince dimitri princely family of monaco princess alexia (2005 -) princess eugenie princess laurentien princess of orange queen mathilde random facts royal court royal dress-ups royal jewels royal marriage royal re-enactments. royalty of taiwan royal wedding royal wedding gown settings thailand tips tracts uae customs united kingdom united states of america visit from sweden von hofmannsthal working royals; full-time royals; part-time royals;


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×