Lizzy
Newbie
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2015
- Messages
- 4
- Country
- Germany
I think that both the dress (it suits her very well in my opinion) and her hair look great. If she likes her bangs this way that's fine. Love her smile on each photo.
Kate looks almost worringly frail, there is too much hair for such a frame.
The dress is fine and fits her well. The hair, oh the hair. If she is going to have bangs that length, she needs to cut at least 6 inches off the length so that it's not weighing her face down. If not, then she needs to trim her bangs a bit more. (I personally think that she needs to cut the length). It's nice that she is trying something different though.
Maybe she was more interested in the job at hand than making a fashion statement?
I thought Katherine looked very nice. Her hair is OK but I'm betting it is cut that way to keep little fingers from yanking on it. Interesting how different people see things differently .... I was thinking how much fuller her face looked than usual. As to the length of the dress, well, looking at Max and Mary, I saw little difference except that Max's was shorter and Mary's about the same length, just above the knee. Oh well .... she can't win'em all.
Like the dress. Do I like the hair ? No. But when I see her interact with the kids, who cares about hair? Hair doesn't matter folks!
Having seen the 'Helicopter' view of her hair I think we can safely say it isn't a wig. However, it does look very poofy around the face which makes Catherine's face look a lot finer and well rested, very flattering actually.The hair is just too much. all in her face, looks like a wig
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CPGUnqaWcAAkVI9.jpg
of course when its not flying all over
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/17/12/2C6B5E6900000578-3238065-image-m-115_1442489914842.jpg
The dress is simple and nice but maybe showing too much of her leg?
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/17/12/2C6B64C200000578-3238065-image-a-127_1442490490963.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/17/11/2C6B11EC00000578-3238065-image-a-54_1442487551698.jpg
Yep, we've just come full circle. But am still confused as to why her hair is referred to as having a fringe or bangs. She doesn't, she merely has a little feathering around her face. If it was an actual fringe it would be in her eyes.Re: the bangs being recycled: The Grand Return of Kate Middleton?s Bangs | Vanity Fair
It was Nov of 2012.
http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/mp/in9VQftXpMKl.jpg
http://www.allure.com/beauty-trends...orter/2012/12/02/kate-middleton-new-bangs.jpg
I see your point but we, on this thread, are discussing fashion. I commend to you the Current Events threads where "the job" of each royal is discussed at length.Maybe she was more interested in the job at hand than making a fashion statement?
Yep, we've just come full circle. But am still confused as to why her hair is referred to as having a fringe or bangs. She doesn't, she merely has a little feathering around her face. If it was an actual fringe it would be in her eyes.
The colour is really pretty on herThe Duke and Duchess of Cambridge laugh as they attend the opening ceremony of the Rugby World Cup at Twickenham
Royal blue coat from Reiss
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/18/19/2C79A93C00000578-3240247-image-a-46_1442600314748.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/18/19/2C79AA4C00000578-3240247-image-a-47_1442600332351.jpg