The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #441  
Old 11-18-2016, 03:29 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 21,337
Whilst I understand the logistics of keeping HM and the "crew" at BP. I just think the renovations would be done quicker and the public would see results quicker if the whole place was shut down and it done in 4 or 5 years not 10.

Whilst the amount of money might not even scratch the surface, in black and white it's a lot of money in this present climate.
__________________

__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #442  
Old 11-18-2016, 03:42 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,152
Really good explanation of the work to be done and why

http://www.macleans.ca/society/bucki...-may-not-know/
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #443  
Old 11-18-2016, 04:22 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen View Post
Whilst I understand the logistics of keeping HM and the "crew" at BP. I just think the renovations would be done quicker and the public would see results quicker if the whole place was shut down and it done in 4 or 5 years not 10.

Whilst the amount of money might not even scratch the surface, in black and white it's a lot of money in this present climate.
It's one of the main reasons why the project will take that amount of time. It's remaining a full-time working home while the project take place.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #444  
Old 11-18-2016, 04:27 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
Quote:
What realistic alternative is there for BP in London?
As a Londoner I seriously CANNOT think of a viable location.. St James' ? {too small], KP?[too small and occupied] Hampton Court ? {too distant, and open to the Public, Lancaster House ? [ FAR too small.] An Hotel [the Ritz, for example] ? Privately owned, so to rent it, would add VASTLY to the cost of the whole exercise...

Others may have other ideas, but 'I'm stumped' !
Reply With Quote
  #445  
Old 11-18-2016, 04:50 PM
Jacknch's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Suffolk, United Kingdom
Posts: 8,378
I think it is long overdue to have the Palace repaired - that old adage of "make do and mend" is all very well if you actually do the "mend" bit - something we all too often lack. I did have it in mind for there to be some cosmetic improvements as well but I suppose the repairs will do.
__________________
JACK
Reply With Quote
  #446  
Old 11-18-2016, 04:53 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,152
They are doing it in sections which will help since the palace is 4 sided around a forecourt. The back section is where the state rooms are.

There isn't a govt office building to stick the various people who work at BP. Renting central London office space would be expensive.

Plus being a Grade 1 building, it adds cost and time.
Reply With Quote
  #447  
Old 11-18-2016, 05:39 PM
hel hel is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Posts: 661
Was there a figure/time scale given if they moved everyone out?

Even if they halved the time, that's still a lot of tourist revenue to forego (and how many people will put off trips to the UK until it's open again?).

Another factor is the tens of thousands of people who would be cheated of the experience of having their investiture at BP, or attending a garden party, etc.

I have to believe that those people were a factor in the decision.

The reality is that extraordinary buildings require extraordinary upkeep.
Reply With Quote
  #448  
Old 11-18-2016, 07:06 PM
cepe's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,333
Buckingham Palace renovation: 9 things you may not know - Macleans.ca

This is a great report by a canadian journalist explaining the situation re BP refit. I've pointed UK journos in this direction and some are unhappy. Thats probably because it isnt biased - its balanced pragmatic and honest IMO.

Really worth reading.

Can I add that this isnt about doing work that the public will see - its mainly infrastructure. Its about enable the palace to work in the 21st century. Its reducing risk
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #449  
Old 11-18-2016, 07:27 PM
Muhler's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 13,660
A major renovation will certainly save money! Lots of money!

Apart from the danger of the whole thing caving in eventually - and that'll be pretty expensive! Not to mention the risk of fire.
It must cost a fortune in heating and electric bills!

I imagine the windows are hopelessly old-fashioned and draughty.
The walls are no doubt not insulated.
That means loads of heat going out the palace every day. Good for the song-birds on cold days but not for the heating bill!

Updating the wiring will not only make the place safer, but safe lots of money as well. Imagine all the low energy-devises that the current sockets and wiring is not designed to cope with.

London as about the same latitude as Berlin and in Germany they have more solar-panels than mushrooms! So a few panels here and there on the roofs will not only safe a little extra money but send out a good signal environmental-wise as well.

A good ventilation system means windows in many places need never be opened. And that's good for security as well. - Without the need for air-condition mind you.

Installing modern toilets and piping alone is enough to save hundreds of liters of water every single day. At the very least!

The heating system. A modern intelligent system will save loads of money every day, simply by lowering and increasing the temperature according to where people are at any given time.

Insulating the roof will with guarantee save serious money! - Alas, the birds will no longer be able to warm the feet...

In ten years BP could be the most energy-efficient palace in the world. easily reducing the costs with 50 % (I'm probably being conservative here).
Reply With Quote
  #450  
Old 11-18-2016, 07:31 PM
cepe's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,333
Id just love to project manage this. So exciting
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #452  
Old 11-19-2016, 03:52 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 10,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
As a Londoner I seriously CANNOT think of a viable location.. St James' ? {too small], KP?[too small and occupied] Hampton Court ? {too distant, and open to the Public, Lancaster House ? [ FAR too small.] An Hotel [the Ritz, for example] ? Privately owned, so to rent it, would add VASTLY to the cost of the whole exercise...

Others may have other ideas, but 'I'm stumped' !
Place the staff in empty offices (plenty of these in London) for the duration of the works. For representation the Queen can use Clarence House, St James' Palace, Kensington Palace, Hampton Court and Windsor Castle.

Note that large parts of the year the Queen already uses residences as Windsor, Holyroodhouse, Balmoral and Sandringham anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
Id just love to project manage this. So exciting
In Amsterdam foreign delegations were shocked to see how their heads-of-state would be housed. The French President, M Jacques Chirac, had to use an oldfashioned bathroom with a little radiator heater in a lightplug. The (lukewarm) water came a long way through 19th C led pipings. Wisely the French delegation did opt for a stay in hotels in Amsterdam...

Like in Buckingham Palace also in Amsterdam there are new pipings, new wirings, new technical installations, new High Rendement heating equipments, new elevators, new ventilation systems, improved lighting schemes, completely new kitchens with state-of-the-art appliances, new security equipment. That is what "the public" will never see.

Visible are: new wallhangings, new curtains, new tapestries, cleaned frescoes, freshly applied gold on ornaments, cleaned and repaired chandeliers, refurbished and re-arranged furnitures, etc. The bathrooms and sanitair were updated, as were the guest appartments and guest rooms. The exterior was carefully cleaned. All window panes were replaced. Still the herculean job is not done: now the mighty grand marble hall (Citizens' Hall) will be restored, undoubtedly again for a staggering amount of money...

Morale of the story: works to houses of this scale never stop... My advice to the British friends would be: when you are ready with the works, keep it up-to-date, do not delay necessary maintenance. It will only multiply the ultimate bill.
Reply With Quote
  #453  
Old 11-19-2016, 06:39 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
Anyone with a marketing bent could find a way of making recycled souvenirs out of all the bits they take out - pens from pipes, baskets from wire etc. And sell them to tourists with a certificate of authenticity. Not only recycling which would be approved of by Charles, but a massive money saving opportunity which the rest of the Nation would appreciate.....
Possibly an 'Artist/Craftspeople in residence' could make objects or sale, to help obviate the cost ?
Reply With Quote
  #454  
Old 11-19-2016, 06:46 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 10,453
It will remain a fantasy but it would be wonderful to tear down that awful East Wing (the façade) and restore the open quadrangle structure including the Marble Arch.
Reply With Quote
  #455  
Old 11-19-2016, 06:50 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
Quote:
It will remain a fantasy but it would be wonderful to tear down that awful East Wing (the façade) and restore the open quadrangle structure including the Marble Arch.
I'd like that too.. but it would remove forever the Balcony appearances that are SO much a part of British Royal life..
Reply With Quote
  #456  
Old 11-19-2016, 06:51 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 10,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
Anyone with a marketing bent could find a way of making recycled souvenirs out of all the bits they take out - pens from pipes, baskets from wire etc. And sell them to tourists with a certificate of authenticity. Not only recycling which would be approved of by Charles, but a massive money saving opportunity which the rest of the Nation would appreciate.....
Possibly an 'Artist/Craftspeople in residence' could make objects or sale, to help obviate the cost ?
The building remains intact. Original stones will be re-used. The "rubbish" will be the old boilers, the led pipings, the rotten wooden beams, the cracked tiles, the rusty pipes, the asbestos plates, the dangerous copper cables with textile covers, the oil-leaking hydraulic lifts, the rusty water tanks, etc.

So I doubt there will be enough to sell as "souvenir" (and I doubt esthetic Charles would like that...). It is not like tearing down the Berlin Wall. It is a renovation, not a demolishion...

Reply With Quote
  #457  
Old 11-19-2016, 07:02 AM
duke of poliganc's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: cairo, Egypt
Posts: 627
afaik they aren't gonna start with the queen's apartment till 2025-6 when she will be 100 years old although i wish she live till 150 but i think that they are thinking practically that at that point the queen probably won't be there and the prince of wales will just stay in clarence house till they finish so there is no need for the queen to move .
Reply With Quote
  #458  
Old 11-19-2016, 07:03 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
Craftspeople could do WONDERS with that stuff, and the desire of visitors to 'own a bit of Buckingham Palace' is not to be underestimated.
Reply With Quote
  #459  
Old 11-19-2016, 10:35 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke of poliganc View Post
afaik they aren't gonna start with the queen's apartment till 2025-6 when she will be 100 years old although i wish she live till 150 but i think that they are thinking practically that at that point the queen probably won't be there and the prince of wales will just stay in clarence house till they finish so there is no need for the queen to move .
I have to say I thought that to when the I read that they were saving the North wing until last. Even if the Queen, is (god-willing) alive by then I suspect at 100 years old she would be quiet happy to move full time into Windsor while the work is carried out.
Reply With Quote
  #460  
Old 11-19-2016, 10:54 AM
BMC's Avatar
BMC BMC is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 305
I know it is a great deal of money to refurbish the palace. Yet once the work is done it won't have to be renovated again for several decades. And I'll bet it is costing more now because little or no renovating has been done since the Queen became Queen so now there is a lot more that needs doing.

These old buildings are a nightmare when it comes to modernization too, they weren't built with modern electrical, heating & plumbing systems in mind so installing or upgrading them is a real challenge.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
castles, homes, palaces, residences, royal residences

« Sandringham House | - »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Palace of Oscarshall LaMinka Norwegian Royal Residences 13 05-12-2018 06:18 PM
Your fantasy palace Alastair_r General Royal Discussion Archive 3 09-04-2009 01:01 PM
8Oth Birthday Exhibition of dresses in Buckingham Palacee PrincessofEurope Royal Style File 7 05-22-2009 05:53 PM
"The Palace" fictional TV series, 2008 Beck The Electronic Domain 19 01-17-2008 09:47 PM
November 2005 Newsletter: Featuring Buckingham Palace & King Juan Carlos of Spain GrandDuchess Forum Announcements and Admin 20 10-27-2005 02:41 PM




Popular Tags
abdication althorp anastasia bridal gown british chittagong cht clarence house coronavirus crown princess victoria danish royalty diana princess of wales dna dubai dutch dutch royal family earl of snowdon facts fantasy movie general news thread heraldry hill historical drama house of glucksburg intro italian royal family japan jewellery jumma king salman languages list of rulers mail mary: crown princess of denmark monaco history nepalese royal jewels nobel 2019 northern ireland norway norwegian royal family palestine prince dimitri princess alexia (2005 -) princess chulabhorn walailak princess laurentien princess of orange queen mathilde random facts rown royal court royal dress-ups royal jewels royal marriage royal re-enactments. royal wedding royal wedding gown saudi arabia serbian royal family settings snowdon swedish royal family thailand thai royal family tips tracts uae customs united kingdom united states of america wittelsbach working royals; full-time royals; part-time royals;


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×