 |
|

05-31-2006, 07:50 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 964
|
|
Bagshot Park
Does anybody have pictures of the Earl and Countess of Wessex's House?
__________________
HRHAmy
|

06-01-2006, 02:41 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 964
|
|
Thank you so much Australian! I just love it, it's very lovely!:)
__________________
HRHAmy
|

11-04-2008, 08:11 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 24,972
|
|
I was wondering, didn't Bagshot Park originally belong to the Duke of Connaught? Did his daughter and Swedish heirs sell it to HM The Queen afterwards?
I am wondering, are the Earl and Countess of Wessex using the entire building for themselves? If so they have a bigger house than any of the European crownprinces and even some monarchs probably.
|

11-04-2008, 08:22 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,553
|
|
I don't think it belonged to him. It would have been a "Grace & Favour" residence. Once he died & his family no longer wanted to live there it would have reverted to the crown estates. It was leased for a considerable number of years to the Army Chaplains department and then was vacant until Sophie & Edward took it over.
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
|

11-25-2008, 05:50 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,398
|
|
Wymanda, isn't it constantly part of the crown estate? I ask because you said it would have "reverted" after the Duke's death. But how can it revert when it is always owned by the Crown? Either way, I believe you are right that for the Duke it was grace and favor. And also now it is the grace and favor residence of the Wessex. I understand Prince Edward has to pay a very small rent to the Crown Estate. It is a big residence like Marengo said. I think it's so big because it has been added and piled onto many times, giving it its sort of hodge podge look.
|

11-26-2008, 05:15 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,403
|
|
.... but its strill a very large house for a minor royal to have and maintain. Its lucky "mummy" helps with the running costs.
|

11-26-2008, 05:43 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 1,989
|
|
Bagshot Park is wonderful residance. Nice pics.
Where do live Camilla and Charles?
|

11-26-2008, 08:36 AM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by QUEENECE29
Where do live Camilla and Charles?
|
Clarence House in London
Highgrove in the country
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

11-26-2008, 01:08 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,398
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel
.... but its strill a very large house for a minor royal to have and maintain. Its lucky "mummy" helps with the running costs.
|
Yes, the Crown Estate is a nice organization to have batting for you.
He specifically wanted to live there for some reason. Overall, Prince Edward does not seem to be a demanding person. He does his duties and is paid for it. If he wants the house, let him have the house. His mother can afford to let him live in that house, and he's got to live somewhere. BP doesn't seem much like a home, more like, as Prince Philip? said, "over the shop"? With a family, he needs more than his office building for his home.
|

11-26-2008, 01:25 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,985
|
|
Actually when he brought the house in 1997. There was another debate entirely. Edward was not looking for a house he was looking for an apartment. The Queen Mother who knew and had often visited Bagshot Park spoke to him about it. She had looked the house and she had attempted to buy the house herself in the 1960's, but the crown estates gave it to the army.
Anyway she was horrified about the state the army had let the house fall into. It was in such a state of affairs that British Heritage believed it would be too expensive to preserve. The army had already declared their intend to move out of Bagshot Park and as per their agreement lease restored it to a condition that was workable.
It must be noted that the Bagshot Park estate is part of the houses that is deemed sensitive and therefore can never be put up for market in the convential way. If Edward had not taken it it would still probably still be standing empty. Or another government or military deptment would have moved in and still be paying subsidised rent.
|

12-21-2008, 01:19 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
|
|
Bagshot Park, like most of the royal residences, is owned by the Crown Estate and leased to its occupant under long-term agreements. Prince Edward and Prince Andrew both assumed new 99-year leases on Bagshot Park and Royal Lodge with the Crown Estate. Presumbly, The Queen paid for the renovations and probably the cost of the leases since neither Edward nor Andrew are particularly wealthy.
Clarence House is also owned by the Crown Estate and leased to Prince Charles. He pays for the cost himself out of his own private monies.
|

12-22-2008, 01:21 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
Claire, thanks for filling us in on some of the background on Baghshot Park. I wonder whether it's possible that some or many of the rooms aren't in use and so aren't heated or don't cost a lot to maintain.
|

12-22-2008, 01:29 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monterey, United States
Posts: 2,323
|
|
Wonder if the kids like seems a bit bland child wise
|

12-22-2008, 01:37 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
There'd be lots of places to play "hide and seek", I bet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal Fan
Wonder if the kids like seems a bit bland child wise
|
|

02-07-2009, 03:16 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 964
|
|
It sure is a shame there are no pictures of the inside of the house.
__________________
HRHAmy
|

02-11-2009, 05:57 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,403
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mermaid1962
Thanks for filling us in on some of the background on Baghshot Park. I wonder whether it's possible that some or many of the rooms aren't in use and so aren't heated or don't cost a lot to maintain. 
|
What a waste! Wonder what prompted Edward and Sophie to choose the house? Just bad judgement, IMO!
|

05-18-2013, 12:24 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 22
|
|
Nice mansion though  where the private room?
|

05-18-2013, 02:38 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 986
|
|
They dont use the entire mansion. They have kept a few rooms for themselves and rented out the rest to a drug company. That rent provides for the lease amount they pay to Crown Estate..
__________________
The only word I hate in the Royal Dictionary - ABDICATION
|

06-23-2013, 12:33 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 726
|
|
I just wonder how this is not a nightmare on both parts. Royal security has to deal with people moving around the place, and the company has to deal with royal security.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|