Who Would You Choose - William or Harry?


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Prince Harry vs Prince William: who is Highgrove's hottest totty?

They are fast earning a reputation as the Party Princes, and there is no denying William and Harry are far more approachable (and easier on the eye) than their royal ancestors. But just how much do we know about these sexy royals, and who is the hottest heir to the throne?

http://www.ivillage.co.uk/newspol/celeb/cfeat/articles/0,,528719_704496-1,00.html

:wacko:
 
Skydragon said:
Prince Harry vs Prince William: who is Highgrove's hottest totty?

They are fast earning a reputation as the Party Princes, and there is no denying William and Harry are far more approachable (and easier on the eye) than their royal ancestors. But just how much do we know about these sexy royals, and who is the hottest heir to the throne?

http://www.ivillage.co.uk/newspol/celeb/cfeat/articles/0,,528719_704496-1,00.html

:wacko:

Oh my, what a bunch of poorly-written drivel. I'm almost embarrassed for the writer.:blink:
 
My 2 cents are: the way I see it, both boys have <nothing> on their father, the inifinitely-more-interesting-as-a-human Prince Charles. You all can laugh at me all you want, I stick by my choice here. :) Why? It's so simple: Charles over the years has shown he posesses the courage to stick his neck out when it comes to not-so-popular ideas, whether it is what his country is doing to the architectural cultural heritage of its society, whether it is being an organic farmer way way before that phenomenon was <anywhere> on the average Joe's radar screen.

Charles is an independent thinking intellectual, that's what I like (though I could do without his fox hunting penchant)

As for Harry, I like the artistic side of him, i.e. he's a painter of sorts. But he does come across as spoilt, thick, and spoilt, and thick, and ..I guess I mad e my point there.

William...not sure what to think. Is he really as boring as he seems? Is he rather just consistent and mature in his choices? Or is he another Willem Alexander, always miffed at the press and and miffed to the world at large because, boo hoo, he's just so misunderstood because no one knows how hard his life really is, my oh my (granted Charles has also had these moments, but not when he was William's age).

In short: despite the age difference between moi, and Charles, I'd pick him. Camilla, move over already! ;)
 
Who Would You Choose? William or Harry?

princess olga said:
As for Harry, I like the artistic side of him, i.e. he's a painter of sorts. But he does come across as spoilt, thick, and spoilt, and thick, and ..I guess I mad e my point there.
What has Cornet H. Wales done of resent that make you think that he is spoilt? He is a Trained Troop learder After all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
selrahc4 said:
Oh my, what a bunch of poorly-written drivel. I'm almost embarrassed for the writer.:blink:
It looks like the writer is too embarrassed to put their name to the article - there's no by-line. :ermm:
 
kpusa1981 said:
What has Cornet H. Wales done of resent that make you think that he is spoilt? He is a Trained Troop learder After all.

I don't think the fact that he is a trained soldier means he is not spoiled. The two things don't necessarily go hand-in-hand. I'm sure even though he has some good qualities from his training (discipline, etc.) that he can still be spoiled. It doesn't make him a bad person. You can be a great person but still spoiled from having too much of what most people never have. A writer of a Kennedy bio once said, in reference to the Kennedys: "What they have, we only dream of..." or something like that. Someone like Harry has no idea what it's like to want to go on a ski trip to some fancy place like Klosters because he does it every year. Meanwhile, people like me have to settle for the cheesy ski resorts that can't even really be called "ski resorts" and people worse off than me never go skiing at all. :sad:

Spoiled or not, I would choose Harry because he seems like lots of fun! I like Wills too but ........ I guess Harry is just more my type.
 
Last edited:
CasiraghiTrio said:
I don't think the fact that he is a trained soldier means he is not spoiled. The two things don't necessarily go hand-in-hand. I'm sure even though he has some good qualities from his training (discipline, etc.) that he can still be spoiled. It doesn't make him a bad person. You can be a great person but still spoiled from having too much of what most people never have. A writer of a Kennedy bio once said, in reference to the Kennedys: "What they have, we only dream of..." or something like that. Someone like Harry has no idea what it's like to want to go on a ski trip to some fancy place like Klosters because he does it every year. Meanwhile, people like me have to settle for the cheesy ski resorts that can't even really be called "ski resorts" and people worse off than me never go skiing at all. :sad:

.

You are right, just because he is an officer, does not mean he is not spoilt or is a better person than anyone else.

Don't forget that Harry or William might like to do some of the things we might do, but can't because of all the repercussions. Some rich people, yearn for the love, friends and freedoms that others, with less money and responsibility enjoy. :flowers:

I think they are both nice, in their own ways
 
Princess Olga
As for Harry, I like the artistic side of him, i.e. he's a painter of sorts. But he does come across as spoilt, thick, and spoilt, and thick, and ..I guess I mad e my point there.

William...not sure what to think. Is he really as boring as he seems? Is he rather just consistent and mature in his choices? Or is he another Willem Alexander, always miffed at the press and and miffed to the world at large because, boo hoo, he's just so misunderstood because no one knows how hard his life really is, my oh my (granted Charles has also had these moments
Skydrago and anyone else dose Cornet H. Wales seem spoilt, thick, and spoilt, and thick, and ..I guess I mad e my point there. As Prinecess olga said?
I agree about William.
 
Last edited:
Can I have both?:brows: I would'nt know who to choose. William for looks, Harry for personality! Harry has really grown on me in the past few months.
 
Skydragon said:
Prince Harry vs Prince William: who is Highgrove's hottest totty?

They are fast earning a reputation as the Party Princes, and there is no denying William and Harry are far more approachable (and easier on the eye) than their royal ancestors. But just how much do we know about these sexy royals, and who is the hottest heir to the throne?

http://www.ivillage.co.uk/newspol/celeb/cfeat/articles/0,,528719_704496-1,00.html

:wacko:


Boy, these people just love to try and sell their product by rehashing interviews from the past. Still interesting though.:)


Love them both...depends upon my mood of who I would chose....right this second...William.
 
princess olga said:
Charles is an independent thinking intellectual, that's what I like (though I could do without his fox hunting penchant)


Oh boy, Cam...you better look out!

I like all the fellas, each have a side of them that I have, so when that side is showing, I'd like them to be around that side...however it is said.

As far as Charles, I always liked him before his marriage and up until the Diana thing where it appeared that Charles wasn't a good father. But, the man has done such a marvelous job with his two boys that I must commend him for it. And, his new website is absolutely great!:)
 
I choose William. I don't care how attractive Harry is and will become. William has always looked hot to me, and just felt more right for me. We have some similarities, and he is a year older than me. Harry's a year younger but I prefer older guys.:wub:
 
sashajones said:
My choice is William. Harry is simply too unattractive.

I have to agree with you to some extent. When I was 14 and saw a pic of William and say some pics of Harry. Harry wasn't attractive to me, I guess because I was more into blonds and brunettes and not too much into redheads like myself:ROFLMAO: And William has always seemed just sexy and sexier.
 
PrincessNatalie said:
Can I have both?:brows: I would'nt know who to choose. William for looks, Harry for personality! Harry has really grown on me in the past few months.

I think William has a personality.
 
Ellie2 said:
harry's lates nazi gaffe, illustrates that point exactly...he doesn't ever stop and think about consequences..if i do A, BCD might occur! its all about weighing the pros and cons and understanding that for every action there is a reaction..the fact that he lacks that basic of all logics makes him less appealing to me

That, right there is why I could never have a crush on him. If I ever meet Harry I would have to let him know how the Nazi custome hurt me and how sensitive I am about white power and Nazism. I don't believe he is racist, but I don't think he really understands or have similar feelings about Nazism and white power.:neutral:
 
Harry, he seems much more down to earth. And he gets hotter by the day.
 
HCAP87 said:
Harry, he seems much more down to earth. And he gets hotter by the day.

I agree. He is gettting More Handsome everyday. & he does seem more Down to Earth ( not to say that William isn't. But, william is very stiff & he has to be). But harry is more carefree. Yeah, he has his mis-steps every now & then. :ohmy: But, he isn't perfect & I think that is what many love about the guy. :wub: Royal or Not they are all still human like the rest of us.

But, I love the Red hair & the Apple cheeks.
 
Who would win...

Honestly, in a fight who would win...Wills or Harry.


I say Harry, he seems more like a fighter.:wub:
 
Harry- he seems like he'd be a dirty fighter.
Wills would hold his own, but he'd follow the rules and be honorable, so I think Harry'd win.

It's like Bridget Jones's Diary (which I watched last night, which is why I'm making this comparison :)), but Harry would be Daniel (Hugh Grant) and Wills would be Mark Darcy (Colin Firth). ;) hehe
 
It's the quiet ones you have to watch! :rolleyes:
 
That's so true Skydragon! But, in this case, i don't think so. Harry just seems like he would break all the rules of the game! lol
 
Harry of course:wub: ...mr.radical:lol: ... :ROFLMAO:
 
Harry. I imagine William would be a bit of a girly fighter. Biting, scratching, slapping etc. Then again, anyone with an ashtray in a sock could win it.
 
I think Harry would win.
 
BeatrixFan said:
Harry. I imagine William would be a bit of a girly fighter. Biting, scratching, slapping etc. Then again, anyone with an ashtray in a sock could win it.

I think it would be a tie. There isn't anything girly about Prince William at all, He's a strong and athletic man who's been participating in sports since he was a small boy.
Prince Harry has also been participating in sports since he was small. I saw an article that touched on this subject, the article (I'll try to find it) quoted Prince Harry as saying that William runs faster than he does. Since William is slightly taller he might have a longer reach in a fight, and he might be a bit faster on his feet. Prince Harry might be more solid and more deliberate, so I think it would just balance out to a tie.

Besides, they're brothers that actually love one another. Any fighting they did would be strickly for laughs. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom