UN Calls for Referendum on Royal Family: April 2008


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ridiculous. I'd suggest they worry more about Africans starving, Tibetans being slaughtered into silence and Arabic women being oppressed by tyrannic war lords rather than Britain's internal affairs.
 
A wrong and undue interference. ¡Good Lord! Awful. :ohmy:
 
I dare the UN to call for the abolition of the monarchy in Saudi Arabia and the creation of a republic there. Why pick on the UK, where the royals are largely limited by the constitution?
 
A lot of the articles said that "An United Nations report" or a report from The UN Human Rights Council - is it available to the public? Does anyone have a link to the actual report instead of just newspaper articles on the subject?
 
A lot of the articles said that "An United Nations report" or a report from The UN Human Rights Council - is it available to the public? Does anyone have a link to the actual report instead of just newspaper articles on the subject?
I have this... :flowers:
The Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the United Nations in Geneva wishes to contradict several inaccuracies and distortions contained in a report in the London Daily Express, which seems to have been echoed by certain other news organizations, to the effect that Sri Lanka called for the abolition of the British monarchy. There was no such call, not by Sri Lanka and not by the UN Human Rights Council. Indeed the quote cited in the Daily Express does not include such a call. It recommends only that the UK 'consider' the holding of a referendum on the desirability or otherwise of a written constitution, preferably republican, with a bill of rights

http://www.lankamission.org/content/view/394/1/
 
Recent posts not strictly relevant to the thread topic have been removed.

Warren
British royals moderator
 
Skydragon said:
The Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the United Nations in Geneva... recommends only that the UK 'consider' the holding of a referendum on the desirability or otherwise of a written constitution, preferably republican...
It's curious that a "recommendation" for the holding of a referendum would also state the preferred outcome!
More likely Sri Lanka's Permanent Mission in Geneva felt aggrieved about something a British diplomat said and this was their way of getting one back.
 
It is curious that Sri Lanka is concerned about the oppression of the British people, when they could be talking about Darfur, Myanmar, the Taliban and any number of other serious world situations. Perhaps the Sri Lankans feel confident about their ability to beat up on the figurehead of the British monarchy?
 
It is curious that Sri Lanka is concerned about the oppression of the British people.

It must be very nice for the British people to know - that in the midst of the missery in this world - they are not forgotten. Sri Lanka is keeping an eye on their welfare:ROFLMAO:
 
How very dare they!!:eek:
 
It is curious that Sri Lanka is concerned about the oppression of the British people, when they could be talking about Darfur, Myanmar, the Taliban and any number of other serious world situations. Perhaps the Sri Lankans feel confident about their ability to beat up on the figurehead of the British monarchy?
Our government is probably considering it, just because the UN suggested it and they know that Britain wouldn't go so far as to tell them to get lost! :eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom