The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1121  
Old 10-16-2017, 06:51 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
When Queen Victoria’s cousin The Duke of Cambridge died in 1904 he had 11 knighthoods

So we know those days are long past. I don’t know why people (actually I do) try use this against Kate that it’s the Queen showing her displeasure.

Was the Queen showing her displeasure at Andrew and Edward when she made William a Thistle Knight but not her sons.

Is she showing her displeasure with Harry by only giving him KCVO and not GCVO. Why not make him a Garter Knight like his brother?

I believe Ivory is the issue and it wouldn’t be an insult to the Queen as she knows William’s views but anyway can agree to disagree.
I think the order being made with ivory is the issue too, but why haven’t it entered the royals brains to change the setting so Catherine can wear her order at formal events?
__________________

__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #1122  
Old 10-16-2017, 06:51 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 242
How in the world do you get 11 knighthoods?

Re Andrew and Edward not being Thistle Knights and William being one, I don't throw shade at that. One, William is the heir to the heir and he is going to get certain things others won't. Also, he is a blood family member.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #1123  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:02 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
The Queen had a brooch (The Centenary Rose Brooch) made for her mother’s 100th Birthday in rock crystal- The Royal Order of Sartorial Splendor: Sunday Brooch: The Centenary Rose

The same crystal could be used to make Catherine’s family order. That solve the ivory issue. It’s better than leaving a senior royal without her family order.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #1124  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:04 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 5,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
Quote:
Getting the family order isnít about the amount of work one do. Itís an honor given to senior female members of the royal family. Itís worn on formal occasions.
Catherine shouldíve already have it.

The Queen received her grandfatherís family order (George V) in 1935 at the age of 9. What work did she do at the time? Other than sit on her ďGrandpa EnglandísĒ knee.
My own theory is that HM is being very cautious about handing out the RFO because of the tumultuous 80-s and 90's. Diana was the last to immediately receive one due to her position as the Princess of Wales and Sarah never received one. She held off on giving them to Camilla and Sophie for a few years after they married into the family.

I do subscribe to the idea that the fact that the QEII family order is still produced on ivory is one reason that Catherine has not yet received one or worn it publicly if she has it.


Quote:
Getting the family order isnít about the amount of work one do. Itís an honor given to senior female members of the royal family. Itís worn on formal occasions.
Yes some posters seem to be under the impression that there is a "magic number" of engagements that the female family members are expected to reach before they win a "prize." As was pointed out earlier, most of the ladies in the BRF who have RFOs received them when they were young (QEII, Princess Margaret, Princess Anne, Princess Alexandra) or shortly after they married into the family (Katherine Kent, Brigitte, Diana).
Reply With Quote
  #1125  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:04 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,908
Here’s another. Sophie is a Dame of Justice in the Order of St John plus she’s a GCVO. That’s two to Camilla’s one. See where I’m going?

Because there in no ‘method to the Queen’s madness’ that we know of we can’t read anything into who gets what orders and when.

People who tend to dislike Kate seem to always make this an isssue. If she has it now, good for her, if she doesn’t good for her when she does get it
Reply With Quote
  #1126  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:11 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
Hereís another. Sophie is a Dame of Justice in the Order of St John plus sheís a GCVO. Thatís two to Camillaís one. See where Iím going?

Because there in no Ďmethod to the Queensí madness we canít read anything into who gets what orders and when.

People who tend to dislike Kate seem to always make this an isssue. If she has it now, good for her, if she doesnít good for her when she does get it
At least Camilla and Sophie are properly decorated with the family order and Victorian Order for formal occasions. Catherine is left totally bare of any order at formal occasions. It all sticks out like a sore thumb and none of it makes any sense.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #1127  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:13 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
At least Camilla and Sophie are properly decorated with the family order and Victorian Order for formal occasions. Catherine is left totally bare of any order at formal occasions. It all sticks out like a sore thumb and none of it makes any sense.
This right here.
Reply With Quote
  #1128  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:19 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 5,194
Quote:
I am not seeing why Catherine HAS to have the order. She'll be fine if she never gets it
If QEII chooses to not give them to her grandsons' wives, then she doesn't have to do so. She could leave it to her son's reign and they could receive them from him if he chooses to continue the tradition.
Reply With Quote
  #1129  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:21 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 242
Well, as we've seen, things don't always go according to protocol.
Reply With Quote
  #1130  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:33 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 242
And the BRF is tone deaf with the whole ivory thing.
Reply With Quote
  #1131  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:51 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
I totally agree with William on stopping the use of ivory. I applaud him for championing the cause, but he should know that the family order can be made out of different bases. It don’t have to be made out of ivory. He or The Queen could have a newly made family order made by the royal jeweller, Mappin & Webb. Why not do that?
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #1132  
Old 10-16-2017, 08:02 PM
soapstar's Avatar
Super Moderator
Picture of the Week Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 5,922
I've edited a number of posts. Let's please not make this a Kate vs Meghan thing.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #1133  
Old 10-16-2017, 08:05 PM
O-H Anglophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
I disagree, given William's strong stance on ivory. Charles will probably have his made on porcelain.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
I totally agree with William on stopping the use of ivory. I applaud him for championing the cause, but he should know that the family order can be made out of different bases. It don’t have to be made out of ivory. He or The Queen could have a newly made family order made by the royal jeweller, Mappin & Webb. Why not do that?
I think it would be a substantial cost for one or a few orders. I don't think the base will change until Charles is King.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scriptgirl View Post

And the BRF is tone deaf with the whole ivory thing.
I don't understand this post.
Reply With Quote
  #1134  
Old 10-16-2017, 08:19 PM
Somebody's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 6,661
Catherine will certainly need royal orders (not necessarily this one, she can go straight to a higher one) at some point as it would complicate things enormously if her husband hands out orders to foreign royalty and she doesn't have an equal or higher order herself (and the visitors/visited are expected to award her their (highest) order as the monarch's wife).

Luckily, the queen doesn't seem to pay much attention to the tabloids and will certainly not base her personal decisions on them. I am sure she has learned to live with it and will surely not award an order prematurely just to satisfy the tabloids or to please Americans.

Edit: sorry, soapstar, didn't see your post earlier, wasn't my intention to go against your warning. Have edited my post accordingly.
Reply With Quote
  #1135  
Old 10-16-2017, 08:22 PM
Somebody's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 6,661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
I totally agree with William on stopping the use of ivory. I applaud him for championing the cause, but he should know that the family order can be made out of different bases. It donít have to be made out of ivory. He or The Queen could have a newly made family order made by the royal jeweller, Mappin & Webb. Why not do that?
Are the other British orders also ivory-based? Or could awarding the Royal Victorian Order be an alternative (at some point in the future)?
Reply With Quote
  #1136  
Old 10-16-2017, 08:23 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,310
Some are but there are at least a few that aren't ivory based.


LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #1137  
Old 10-16-2017, 08:33 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 5,194
Quote:
Have you seen the Daily Fail comments section?
Yes and I believe that it is not worth my time to read it. As has been mentioned before the DF is not a good or reliable representation of the opinions of the British public. Knowing that this is another of her nation's tabloids, I truly doubt that HM pays it much attention.

Should she decide to give Catherine or Harry's wife one of her RFO's, she'll do it for her own reasons based likely upon seniority and tradition.
Reply With Quote
  #1138  
Old 10-16-2017, 09:47 PM
Leopoldine's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
I think it was the President of Egypt made a State Visit to the UK and awarded Diana with the Order of the Virtues. The Queen is also a member.



I know and itís extremely frustrating and nerve wrecking.

I think Diana's Egyptian order was from the honeymoon on the Britannia.
Reply With Quote
  #1139  
Old 10-16-2017, 10:01 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,418
Yes, so do I. President Sadat and wife and retinue lunched with newly weds Charles and Diana on the Britannia. I think Diana received it then.
Reply With Quote
  #1140  
Old 10-16-2017, 11:22 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
Yes, so do I. President Sadat and wife and retinue lunched with newly weds Charles and Diana on the Britannia. I think Diana received it then.
Oh okay. I remember Diana talking about that. Well, thatís how she racked up two foreign orders.
__________________

__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
orders and decorations, protocol, royal family order


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
america archie mountbatten-windsor asia asian birth britain britannia british royal family camilla camilla parker-bowles camilla parker bowles carolin china china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing chinese clarence house colorblindness commonwealth countries coronation crown jewels customs daisy doge of venice duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex edward vii elizabeth ii family life family tree fashion and style gemstones george vi gradenigo hello! henry viii highgrove hochberg house of windsor hypothetical monarchs japan japanese imperial family jewellery kensington palace king edward vii książ castle liechtenstein lili mountbatten-windsor line of succession list of rulers medical meghan markle monarchist movements monarchists mongolia nara period pless politics portugal prince harry queen elizabeth ii royal ancestry solomon j solomon spanish royal family suthida thai royal family tradition united states united states of america wales


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×