The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #581  
Old 05-12-2016, 11:30 AM
Elly C's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Worcester, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,198
With only a few weeks to the Queen's Official birthday, do we think Catherine will get a family order this time? I'm hoping so and think it is likely after the success of the recent tour.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #582  
Old 05-12-2016, 12:12 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,153
They don't announced awarding a RFO. Just have to wear it to confirm receiving it


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #583  
Old 05-12-2016, 12:14 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elly C View Post
With only a few weeks to the Queen's Official birthday, do we think Catherine will get a family order this time? I'm hoping so and think it is likely after the success of the recent tour.
I do expect that Catherine have recieved the family order. The Royal Family Order of Queen Elizabeth II isn't an knighthood, so we won't get an announcement if she have received it. The only way we know she got it is when she attends at State Banquet and Diplomatic Corps Reception where the family order is worn.

Catherine is the only senior female member of the royal family that's up for a knighthood from The Queen. I hope she will be appointed with the Dame Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order (GCVO), or Dame of Justice Venerable Order of Saint John (DJStJ). She have served The Queen and Royal family for 5 years and provided two heirs to the throne. I think she should be honored as a working senior royal.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #584  
Old 05-12-2016, 05:22 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,543
I think it cheapens the award when an Order is given out to a new royal as soon as they get married. The Danes and Swedes, for example, do this all the time and I think it's silly as it really should be something that is earned or it can't mean anything. On the other hand I think Queen Elizabeth does make family wait an unnecessarily long period of time. Charlene Wittstock was married in the same year as Kate and received her order about a year and a half after her marriage which I think was about right.
Reply With Quote
  #585  
Old 05-12-2016, 05:31 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophie25 View Post
I think it cheapens the award when an Order is given out to a new royal as soon as they get married. The Danes and Swedes, for example, do this all the time and I think it's silly as it really should be something that is earned or it can't mean anything. On the other hand I think Queen Elizabeth does make family wait an unnecessarily long period of time. Charlene Wittstock was married in the same year as Kate and received her order about a year and a half after her marriage which I think was about right.
I see your point, about how it cheapens it. But it does avoid the "they are not worthy" speculations. They litarly become "now you're part of the royal family" which they are and are already working for them so it makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #586  
Old 05-12-2016, 05:35 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 13,216
There is nothing planned for the birthday celebrations that would allow us to see whether she has the RFO. We only see whether they have it at things like State Dinners.
Reply With Quote
  #587  
Old 05-12-2016, 05:43 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Detroit, United States
Posts: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
Catherine is the only senior female member of the royal family that's up for a knighthood from The Queen. I hope she will be appointed with the Dame Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order (GCVO), or Dame of Justice Venerable Order of Saint John (DJStJ). She have served The Queen and Royal family for 5 years and provided two heirs to the throne. I think she should be honored as a working senior royal.
I don't know if she is considered a senior member of the family or not but Princess Michael has not received a knighthood or the family order. I know she is not always well liked but she and her husband have worked on behalf of the queen. It seems she is intentionally being left out when it comes to these things.
Reply With Quote
  #588  
Old 05-12-2016, 05:54 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
There is a State Visit coming up in the fall, and then there's the Diplomatic Corps reception in December. She should have the RFO, by now though. I think Royal Victorian Order would also be due.

I just think it's time for her to have an honor. Why continue to let her attend State events bare of Orders? Don't make much sense to me.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #589  
Old 05-12-2016, 05:55 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noble Consort Ming View Post
I don't know if she is considered a senior member of the family or not but Princess Michael has not received a knighthood or the family order. I know she is not always well liked but she and her husband have worked on behalf of the queen. It seems she is intentionally being left out when it comes to these things.
As the RFO is exactly what its called, a family order and not ever publicized, perhaps the reason why Princess Michael has never received the RFO are because of the Queen's own personal reasons. We'll never know.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
Reply With Quote
  #590  
Old 05-13-2016, 07:42 AM
muriel's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
There is a State Visit coming up in the fall, and then there's the Diplomatic Corps reception in December. She should have the RFO, by now though. I think Royal Victorian Order would also be due.

I just think it's time for her to have an honor. Why continue to let her attend State events bare of Orders? Don't make much sense to me.
Not sure I see the connection between attending events of state and receiving orders. She will receive the Orders when Hm thinks she has done enough to deserve them.

She could well have received the RFO recently, but I think if will be a while before she receives the RVO. Camilla did not receive hers till her 7th wedding anniversary, and nearly 5-6 years after she had received the RFO.
Reply With Quote
  #591  
Old 05-13-2016, 08:30 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 11,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elly C View Post
With only a few weeks to the Queen's Official birthday, do we think Catherine will get a family order this time? I'm hoping so and think it is likely after the success of the recent tour.
How did you measure the "succes" of the recent tour? The Daily Mail being extactic about Kate's dresses while a week earlier she was slashed down as a Duchess Do-Little? Is that a measurement? The RFO seems not connected to anything, not to seniority, not to merits but just to the very personal consideration of the Queen.
Reply With Quote
  #592  
Old 05-13-2016, 10:36 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post
How did you measure the "succes" of the recent tour? The Daily Mail being extactic about Kate's dresses while a week earlier she was slashed down as a Duchess Do-Little? Is that a measurement? The RFO seems not connected to anything, not to seniority, not to merits but just to the very personal consideration of the Queen.
I agree. The Queen can give it to whoever she wants whenever she wants but she's the first Monarch to make family members wait for it. In the past existing royal ladies and ladies marrying into the family got it automatically and when a reign changed they got the new monarch's order straight away as well. It was an indicator that you were royal and wasn't seen as something that had to be earned. I wish it was like that again today as the Queen as other orders which can be seen as awards such as the royal victoriana order.

I also think it is a little bit mean of the Queen not to have given it to Princess Michael after almost 40 years in the family. She might have her own career but she's still done a fair bit if work for the family during that time and I'm sure Prince Michael would like to see her have it as well Jmo.
Reply With Quote
  #593  
Old 05-13-2016, 10:52 AM
Nico's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophie25 View Post
I agree. The Queen can give it to whoever she wants whenever she wants but she's the first Monarch to make family members wait for it. In the past existing royal ladies and ladies marrying into the family got it automatically and when a reign changed they got the new monarch's order straight away as well. It was an indicator that you were royal and wasn't seen as something that had to be earned. I wish it was like that again today as the Queen as other orders which can be seen as awards such as the royal victoriana order.

I also think it is a little bit mean of the Queen not to have given it to Princess Michael after almost 40 years in the family. She might have her own career but she's still done a fair bit if work for the family during that time and I'm sure Prince Michael would like to see her have it as well Jmo.
I guess Princess Michael didn't receive it because her husband was excluded from the order of sucession by marrying her. Technically they are not full time working members of the BRF.
Reply With Quote
  #594  
Old 05-13-2016, 10:58 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nico View Post
I guess Princess Michael didn't receive it because her husband was excluded from the order of sucession by marrying her. Technically they are not full time working members of the BRF.
I don't think so because the Queen has given Prince Michael the royal victorian order amongst other awards. The reality is that if she wanted PM to get it she would give it to her as it is entirely within her personal gift. It's also very possible that she may give one to all of her granddaughters as a keepsake even though they may never wear it. As I said, the Queen can give this order to whoever she wants.
Reply With Quote
  #595  
Old 05-13-2016, 01:34 PM
PetticoatLane's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: A Small Town, United Kingdom
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophie25 View Post
I think it cheapens the award when an Order is given out to a new royal as soon as they get married. The Danes and Swedes, for example, do this all the time and I think it's silly as it really should be something that is earned or it can't mean anything. On the other hand I think Queen Elizabeth does make family wait an unnecessarily long period of time. Charlene Wittstock was married in the same year as Kate and received her order about a year and a half after her marriage which I think was about right.
I agree. The idea of pinning a sash onto a months old baby is plainly absurd.

Equally, I'm not exactly sure what service Mary Donaldson had performed for Denmark when she got her order before her wedding, let alone that of her father who also got an order.
Reply With Quote
  #596  
Old 05-13-2016, 01:50 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by PetticoatLane View Post
I agree. The idea of pinning a sash onto a months old baby is plainly absurd.

Equally, I'm not exactly sure what service Mary Donaldson had performed for Denmark when she got her order before her wedding, let alone that of her father who also got an order.
It's not for service in those cases. It's a "this person is a member of the royal family" badge. Different ways for different countries. No need to put down one way to lift up another.
Reply With Quote
  #597  
Old 05-13-2016, 02:09 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophie25 View Post
I think it cheapens the award when an Order is given out to a new royal as soon as they get married. The Danes and Swedes, for example, do this all the time and I think it's silly as it really should be something that is earned or it can't mean anything. On the other hand I think Queen Elizabeth does make family wait an unnecessarily long period of time. Charlene Wittstock was married in the same year as Kate and received her order about a year and a half after her marriage which I think was about right.


Royal Family Orders, different from other orders, are traditionally given as a mark of belonging to a RF, not as a sign of merit. In the old times it meant a special sign of affection of the sovereign towards a royal lady of his/ her house. So it DID mean something, no matter if she did, earned, something for crown and country or not!
The BRF does have some sort of odd order policy in general; I recall King Albert II never receiving the Garter. The Queen Mother only used her british orders at an incoming state visit and obviously turned down the guest´s order. Queen consorts are never awarded with an order by the british Queen while mere Prince consorts are given the Royal Victorian order (only because of being male?!?). Foreign future Kings don´t receive brit. orders as well although the Queen paid a state visit in the country (example: Norway), etc etc etc ......
What I´m trying to say: The british order policy is unlogic and not transparent. A lot of guessing, nobody knows for sure...
Reply With Quote
  #598  
Old 05-13-2016, 02:09 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by hernameispekka View Post
It's not for service in those cases. It's a "this person is a member of the royal family" badge. Different ways for different countries. No need to put down one way to lift up another.
Well her father isn't a member of the royal family and the order of the elephant in Denmark, for example, actually isn't restricted to royals and is given to other people who have served the country with distinction. I think the order of the seraphim isn't exclusively for royals either.
Reply With Quote
  #599  
Old 05-13-2016, 02:31 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophie25 View Post
Well her father isn't a member of the royal family and the order of the elephant in Denmark, for example, actually isn't restricted to royals and is given to other people who have served the country with distinction. I think the order of the seraphim isn't exclusively for royals either.


CPss Mary´s and Alexandra Manleys fathers received the Dannebrog order, not the Elephant who is restricted only to members of the DRF and heads of state!
Reply With Quote
  #600  
Old 05-13-2016, 02:42 PM
Stefan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 5,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by wartenberg7 View Post
CPss Mary´s and Alexandra Manleys fathers received the Dannebrog order, not the Elephant who is restricted only to members of the DRF and heads of state!
It is also given to foreign heirs to the throne and even in some cases to other members of foreign RF's like Princess Märtha Louise of Norway.
__________________

__________________
Stefan



Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
orders and decorations, protocol, royal family order


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
america archie mountbatten-windsor asia birth britain britannia british british royal family buckingham palace camilla camilla's family camilla parker-bowles camilla parker bowles carolin china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing chinese clarence house colorblindness commonwealth countries coronation crown jewels customs duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex edward vii elizabeth ii family life fashion and style gemstones george vi gradenigo harry and meghan hello! henry viii highgrove hochberg house of windsor hypothetical monarchs japan japanese imperial family japan history kensington palace king edward vii lili mountbatten-windsor line of succession list of rulers medical meghan markle monarchist movements monarchists monarchy mongolia names nara period pless politics prince harry queen elizabeth ii royal ancestry solomon j solomon spanish royal family st edward sussex suthida thai royal family tradition united states of america wales welsh


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×