 |
|

01-09-2013, 09:29 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|
The flag hoisting is reserved for the birthdays of the following people:
- The Sovereign (the Queen)
- The Sovereign's Consort (Prince Philip)
- The Sovereign's children (Prince Charles, Prince Andrew, Prince Edward and Princess Anne)
- The wives of the Sovereign's children (Camilla and Sophie)
- The eldest son of the Prince of Wales (Prince William)
- The wife of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales and his spouse (Kate)
Harry is not the Sovereign's son or the Prince of Wales' eldest son, so his birthday is not in the list.
When Prince Charles becomes King, that will automatically change.
|

01-09-2013, 09:37 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,492
|
|
Thank you for clearing that up - it was what i imagined would be the case and that it would change when Charles becomes King. So when that day comes there will be a big decrease in the number of flag days - Charles, Camilla, William, Kate, their first child, Harry and his future wife
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales
|

01-09-2013, 09:37 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 14,106
|
|
When Charles is King the flags won't be raised for Andrew, Edward, Sophie or Anne anymore either.
When William is King, Harry will once again not have the flag raised.
It will only be done when he is the son of the monarch. If Charles predeceases The Queen then Harry will never be in that position.
|

01-09-2013, 09:41 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrincessofEurope
Thank you for clearing that up - it was what i imagined would be the case and that it would change when Charles becomes King. So when that day comes there will be a big decrease in the number of flag days - Charles, Camilla, William, Kate, their first child, Harry and his future wife
|
You are welcome.
When Charles is King, the flags will be raised for the King (Charles), the Queen (Camilla), the Sovereign's children (William and Harry) and their wives (Kate and Harry's future wife), as well as William's eldest son (or possibly, given the impeding changes, his eldest child regardless of gender).
|

01-09-2013, 06:10 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 728
|
|
I would think that Charles will let the flag continue for his brothers and sister because they have been all their lives. Was there still a flag day for Princess Margaret once QE2 accended?
|

01-10-2013, 01:08 AM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by padams2359
Was there still a flag day for Princess Margaret once QE2 accended?
|
It appears so, as her birthday wasn't removed from the regulations in Northern Ireland until 2002.
I also found a snippet from a book that listed the Duke of Gloucester's birthday as a flag day in 1957, 21 years after George V died. ETA: They were still flying on his birthday in 1969, as they had to be lowered when the Queen ordered them to half staff that day to mark President Eisenhower's death.
|

01-10-2013, 05:54 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 728
|
|
Thank you wbenson. I figured such. Once you are added, it should be for life. I think BRF in general is more respectful of time than title then what most give them credit for. I mean Princess Alice, etc.
|

01-10-2013, 05:57 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ipswich, United Kingdom
Posts: 788
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie
When Charles is King the flags won't be raised for Andrew, Edward, Sophie or Anne anymore either.
When William is King, Harry will once again not have the flag raised.
It will only be done when he is the son of the monarch. If Charles predeceases The Queen then Harry will never be in that position.
|
Charles has no say in the matter its up to Councils.
|

01-09-2020, 06:48 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St Thomas, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Posts: 5,777
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-H Anglophile
Martha Louise of Norway was told not to use her Princess title in her commercial endeavors. I believe that needs to happen to Harry & Meghan as well.
|
Out of curiosity, has the British Royal Family established any rules in relation to the commercial use of royal titles?
According to the websites of their respective employers, it seems the York princesses do not use their Princess titles at work. Was this their own decision, or were they told by "The Firm" that using them at work was not an option?
Which other members of the British Royal Family have earned money commercially, and did they use their titles for those endeavors?
Additionally, I am reposting my question from another thread here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
The old "royal goes first with commoner husband/fiance/other half following three steps behind is archaic other than events where strict protocol is followed, it makes no difference who goes first.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatiana Maria
What is the normal etiquette in the British royal family for those who are in the same position? Do Jack Brooksbank, the Duchess of Gloucester, the Duchess of Kent, and Princess Michael of Kent take care to walk or be seated behind their spouses?
|
|

01-09-2020, 07:46 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,707
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatiana Maria
Out of curiosity, has the British Royal Family established any rules in relation to the commercial use of royal titles?
According to the websites of their respective employers, it seems the York princesses do not use their Princess titles at work. Was this their own decision, or were they told by "The Firm" that using them at work was not an option?
Which other members of the British Royal Family have earned money commercially, and did they use their titles for those endeavors?
Additionally, I am reposting my question from another thread here:
|
I would say the birth royal takes the lead with the non birth royal following uon, i.e. Princess Anne walks before her husband but Catherine walks behind William.
|

01-09-2020, 08:01 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Except they don't follow these 'rules' most of the time. You can see a number of times Catherine walking ahead of William from their engagements.
LaRae
|

01-09-2020, 04:16 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 10,899
|
|
I do not believe that Lord Frederick Windsor used his royal title when he was a male model.
|

02-23-2020, 05:26 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 8,846
|
|
The Queen’s younger sons are theoretically ahead for example of the Duke of Cambridge in the official order of precedence. However, I have never seen an officiall public event like a state dinner or a church service where that allegedly official precedence is observed. The Duke of Cambridge always walks in and is seated apparently with precedence over his uncles. Why is that ?
|

02-23-2020, 05:39 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Could it be that, actually, official precedence *is* being followed? With the sons of the monarch precedence, would it stand to reason that Edward would enter with members of his family and then Andrew, with his family and then Charles with his family and so on with the last and final arrival being HM, The Queen, herself. I may have a cloudy memory on this but it seems to be what I remember from arrivals at weddings.
Just cloudy thoughts on a cloudy day here.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

02-17-2022, 02:18 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St Thomas, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Posts: 5,777
|
|
On February 11, the Government updated the list of designated days when it is compulsory for the national Union flag to be flown over government buildings in Great Britain.
Amy Sharpe of The Mirror reported that the decision was taken in consultation with Buckingham Palace and, according to an anonymous Whitehall source, it was taken due to the scandal around Prince Andrew. The update occurred four days before the Duke of York and Virginia Giuffre announced the settlement of their court case.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...ation-26215549
Quote:
A Whitehall source said: “Some people were uneasy about the flag being flown and as Andrew’s birthday approached it became more pressing.
“With the scandal around him and the decisions taken by the Queen and the military, it was obvious what needed to be done. After consultations with the Palace, it was decided to update the guidance by removing his birthday from dates where a flag should be raised.”
|
However, not only the Duke of York's birthday (February 19) has been removed from the list. In 2021, the list of designated days for flying the Union Flag on UK government buildings included the birthdays of:
the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh
the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall
the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge
the Duke of York
the Earl and Countess of Wessex
the Princess Royal
In the updated list for 2022, the designated birthdays have been trimmed down to the Queen and the Prince of Wales.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/designat...on-flag-flying
I wonder why the decision was taken to remove the birthdays of not only the Duke of York but also other royals apart from the queen and heir apparent. And will the birthday of Queen Camilla be designated as a flag day in the next reign?
|

02-17-2022, 02:26 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 8,713
|
|
 I assume they didn't want to single out the Duke of York and therefore also had to remove his siblings (and sister-in-law).
However, they could still have chose to at least keep both the monarch, the heir AND their spouses on the list.
All in all, they have 4 different days for the queen. That's quite excessive:
- Accession Day (Feb 6)
- Birthday (April 21)
- Coronation Day (June 2)
- Official birthday (June 2 - note: that her official birthday has been moved from the 'second Saturday in June' (June 11) to Coronation day for 2022)
The queen's wedding day, however, has been removed. It was still included for the 2021.
|

02-17-2022, 05:05 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 10,899
|
|
Would The Queen's Wedding Day have been removed from the list because Elizabeth II was now a widow?
|

02-17-2022, 05:46 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla
Would The Queen's Wedding Day have been removed from the list because Elizabeth II was now a widow?
|
That would be a good reason.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

02-17-2022, 06:18 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 8,713
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla
Would The Queen's Wedding Day have been removed from the list because Elizabeth II was now a widow?
|
She was a widow on her wedding anniversary in 2021 as well... (that's why I pointed out that it still was included last year) The 2021 list was last adapted in June (so a few months after the Duke of Edinburgh's death - although his birthday was kept as a flag day as well as their wedding anniversary).
|

02-17-2022, 06:47 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Special days to fly the Union flag over government buildings seem strange to me. In the US, the stars and stripes are flown from sunup to sundown every single day of the year. If the flag is flying at night, it is required for it to be lit up as well. It's amazing to see that at the times when the flag is flown at half mast for some reason, they're flying half mast everywhere in public and private residences.
Then again, the stars and stripes are the only thing we have that is representing all the people and is apolitical.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|