The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #841  
Old 03-16-2023, 06:22 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,401
So its really Ed and Sophi'es blame?
Reply With Quote
  #842  
Old 03-16-2023, 07:17 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 8,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
So its really Ed and Sophi'es blame?

At the time it was announced that the children would be styled as children of an earl on the request of the Earl and Countess of Wessex and with the Queen's approval. So it sounds like the proposal came from Edward and Sophie and was sanctioned by the Queen.


In practice it is hard to know whether it was indeed Edward and Sophie's decison or if the idea came from the Palace given the circumstances at the time (Edward not being expected to become a working royal, Diana's accident, etc.).
Reply With Quote
  #843  
Old 03-16-2023, 08:13 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,401
Yes Im well aware of all that happened in 1999 and IMO it was a good idea to give the children lesser titles. Even if they DID want to become Prince/ess now, and I'm fairly sure they dont, I think the public would not be too keen on the idea.
I think the queen would have liked to keep the children as titled as HRH, but she could see that the public were cooling on there being a lot of royals, too many of them working and trying to find a role, and carrying the style of HRH so she agreed to it in 1999. I think Edward and Sophie did not want their children to be Prince and Princess, they were well down the line of succession and were not supposed to be full time working royals and they were probalby pretty sure that in the next generation their kids would not be wanted as working royals. '
And I think they were right. I dont know of any evidence that Charles has said anything on the issue but in any case I think the public if asked would prefer it if the children remained as Lady and Earl.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
dukedom, royal dukes, styles and titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Royal, Princely and Comital Titles MAfan Royal Families of Italy 33 02-13-2023 05:41 AM
Royal Titles Zina Royal Family of Brunei 25 08-22-2018 09:23 AM
Moroccan Royal Names and Titles bjanka66 Royal Family of Morocco 62 07-25-2018 04:50 PM




Popular Tags
#rashidmrm abdullah ii abolished monarchies africa america arcadie claret bevilacqua caribbean charles iii claret current events danish royal family death denmark duarte pio edward vii elizabeth ii emperor naruhito empress masako espana fallen empires garsenda genealogy grace kelly harry history hobbies hollywood house of gonzaga identifying jordan royal family king charles king philippe lady pamela hicks mall coronation day matrilineal monaco monarchy movies need help new zealand; cyclone gabrielle official visit order of precedence pamela mountbatten portugal preferences prince christian princess of orange queen queen alexandra queen camilla queen elizabeth queen ena of spain queen margrethe ii queen mathilde republics restoration royal initials royal wedding royal without thrones silk spanish history state visit state visit to france state visit to germany switzerland tiaras visit wine glass woven


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2023
Jelsoft Enterprises