 |
|

12-08-2012, 03:40 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,832
|
|
I must say, I think a great deal of people isn't looking forward to the day when the world will have to deal with Camilla's title once Charles come to the throne. Of course Camilla will be Queen Consort when Charles become King. As she is legally HRH The Princess of Wales.
I totally respect her with to only be called HRH The Duchess of Cornwall. I think it's a title that fits her and she has worked very hard on representing The Queen, Britian and Commonwealth under that name. I think if she wishes be titled HRH The Princess Consort when Charles comes to the throne, I think her wish should be respected and granted. Then again, if she and Charles decided she should be called Her Majesty The Queen, then I will respect that too.
I'm just not looking forward to that future debate. I think it's going to be a palace PR mess when the time comes.
__________________
|

12-08-2012, 03:41 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,832
|
|
I think both Charles, Camilla, the royal family and palace officials knows it.
__________________
|

12-08-2012, 03:45 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,149
|
|
The fact is....when Charles becomes King, she becomes Queen. It's just the way it is.
Whether she deserves the title or not is irrelevant, she is who she is.
|

12-08-2012, 03:52 AM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,527
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie
For her not to use the title Queen they do have to pass legislation to make the marriage unequal and as Charles won't have the title 'Prince' she will also cease to have the style 'Princess'. As a result she will have to move up to the style of Queen but the intention is that she won't do that.
|
People in the United Kingdom have the right to call themselves whatever they wish, so I'd think all she has to do to not use the title Queen is choose not to use it. I think in theory anybody could ask to be called "HRH the Princess Consort" and it would be perfectly legal.
|

12-08-2012, 03:54 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|

What about the other Realms though?
It would have been rather strange to be known as The Princess Consort in one realm and The Queen Consort - in fifteen others.
|

12-08-2012, 04:24 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 2,631
|
|
Take Australia for example. AFAIK the only have an (Australian) title for the souverain - which in case of a king is hared by his wife as Queen Consort of Australia. But they don't have Australian titles for the Royal family, they use their British titles as courtesy titles and award them honours as family and representatives of their souverain.
What if Camilla decides to be known not as queen? Then the Australians have a title for her she doesn't want to use, so they have to use her British title as courtesy instead? Wouldn't that be an insult to the Australian nation? That the wife of their king does not want to become their queen but opts instead for a British title? IMHO better to avoid such potential anger in Australia...
|

12-08-2012, 12:42 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 2,631
|
|
Thought about is some more:
if the Queen really did not want Camilla to become queen, she would create her a princess in her own right as "The Princess Camilla", just like she created Philip a Prince of the Uk. Only then Camilla had the choice of titles after her husband's ascension. With this HMe would surely force Charles' hand as she would give the public a clear understanding of her wishes - a lot of media outlets would have arguments for their outcry about "Queen Camilla".
OTOH the fact that nothing besides the publishing of this "intention" ever happened is a clear sign that the queen does not want Charles' reign to be any different from that of his ancestors. IMHO, of course.
|

12-08-2012, 03:39 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
|
|
It has already been clearly established by the precedents in 1936 with Edward VIII that the wife of The King is automatically Queen and no other title or style applies.
In order for Camilla to be styled "HRH The Princess Consort", a title she is not entitled to hold as the wife of The Sovereign, legislation would have to be passed in Parliament and the Crown Commonwealth nations that she will not hold the title and rank of Queen.
I think there is zero chance any future Parliament would agree to pass legislation consenting to this, so Camilla will indeed be "HM The Queen" when her husband becomes King.
|

12-08-2012, 03:50 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,832
|
|
Wasn't it agreed on with The Queen and Parliament that Camilla has chosen to take up the title HRH The Princess Consort when Charles comes to the throne?
On the list of Facts on The Prince of Wales website it says:
"As was explained at the time of their wedding in April 2005, it is intended that The Duchess will be known as HRH The Princess Consort when The Prince of Wales accedes to The Throne."
The samething is stated on the official Monarchy website.
|

12-08-2012, 03:54 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wbenson
People in the United Kingdom have the right to call themselves whatever they wish, so I'd think all she has to do to not use the title Queen is choose not to use it. I think in theory anybody could ask to be called "HRH the Princess Consort" and it would be perfectly legal.
|
Except that she cannot just start using a title or style that (a) doesn't exist and has to be created by The Sovereign with Letters Patent; (b) is not held by her husband, The King, and creates a morganatic marriage since she would not hold equal rank as Her Majesty The Queen.
If they really want to prepare for the future, The Queen should issue Letters Patent now creating Camilla a Princess of the UK in her own right with the style of "HRH The Princess Camilla".
At that point, she would hold her own title and style and when the time comes, Parliament could simply assent (assuming the Crown Commonwealth agrees as well) that she would continue to hold her current title and not use the rank and style of Queen Consort. Charles could then simply announce his wife would hold precedence and place next to The Sovereign.
|

12-08-2012, 03:57 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman
Wasn't it agreed on with The Queen and Parliament that Camilla has chosen to take up the title HRH The Princess Consort when Charles comes to the throne?
|
The key word is "intended" which is not the same as "legal". When this was questioned by members of Parliament, the Lord Chancellor confirmed Camilla would hold all the titles and styles of Prince Charles upon marriage and the question of her future title was not being addressed at this time.
So, in other words, she holds equal rank now and will in the future, therefore, if the public is adamantly opposed when the time comes, it will have to be addressed by Parliament with legislation.
|

12-08-2012, 04:00 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,832
|
|
Oh okay. I'm just not looking forward to the day where this stuff will be addressed.
|

12-08-2012, 04:07 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman
Oh okay. I'm just not looking forward to the day where this stuff will be addressed.
|
It should be a non-issue by the time it happens and no one knows what life will bring in the meantime. Better to leave it alone and address today.
|

12-08-2012, 06:16 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,306
|
|
I really don't see Parliament passing a new act to give Camilla the title "The Princess Consort", the wording from royal aides has always been that Camilla will be "known" as The Princess Consort, to me that suggests a big difference from what she is legally entitled to be called and which title she actually uses on a day to day basis.
When he becomes King surely Charles can create any title he wants (Within reason - and this title is based on Prince Consort of the past) for his wife.
To me it is like how Camilla is know as The Duchess of Cornwall, she holds the title The Princess of Wales at present but chooses not to use it, likewise she will, IMO, be Queen legally but not use the title.
|

12-08-2012, 06:22 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
|
|
Yes, but the difference is, her husband is The Duke of Cornwall, in addition to all of his other titles, which makes Camilla automatically The Duchess of Cornwall. Using her ducal title, instead of her title as Princess of Wales, as her primary style is her choice and not an issue because she holds equal rank as HRH.
Once Charles become King, his wife is automatically HM The Queen in her own right for life. She is no longer HRH or a Princess because her husband is no longer HRH or a Prince.
|

12-08-2012, 11:48 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Camrose, Canada
Posts: 713
|
|
When Charles is King, he will be the Duke of Lancaster, as The Queen is right now. Perhaps Camilla may use the title Duchess of Lancaster, then there would not be a need to create the title of Princess Consort.
She will, however, not be Queen in her own right, as she is still taking her titles from Prince Charles. A "Queen Regnant", like Queen Elizabeth, is a queen in her own right. Camilla will be "Queen Consort".
|

12-09-2012, 12:51 AM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,527
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg
Except that she cannot just start using a title or style that (a) doesn't exist and has to be created by The Sovereign with Letters Patent; (b) is not held by her husband, The King, and creates a morganatic marriage since she would not hold equal rank as Her Majesty The Queen.
|
She can call herself just about whatever she wants so long as it's not fraudulent. There's very little in the way of "cannot" involved in what people say they are. She could wake up tomorrow calling herself the Queen of Siam if she wanted, and society at large would be free to call her that.
It's true that she might not be the Princess Consort, but people aren't required to be, for lack of a better word, truthful in their social interactions.
|

12-09-2012, 01:26 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg
...I think there is zero chance any future Parliament would agree to pass legislation consenting to this, so Camilla will indeed be "HM The Queen" when her husband becomes King.
|
You are absolutely right if it had ever been intended to legally deny Camilla the title and style of the Queen - which I don't believe to be the case.
To me, the most logical scenario (again, if they ever do proceed with the whole Princess Consort thing) is for Camilla to be created The Princess Consort in her own right. Then, while she will legally be Her Majesty The Queen, she will be able to use the lesser of her two titles, The Princess Consort, on semi-official and/or private occasions, and The Queen on state and/or official occassions.
I do sincerely hope though that this will never take place and Camilla will be known only under the style and title she will be entitled as wife of the King - Her Majesty The Queen.
|

12-09-2012, 01:54 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Penelope
When Charles is King, he will be the Duke of Lancaster, as The Queen is right now. Perhaps Camilla may use the title Duchess of Lancaster...
|
That was actually the title proposed for Wallis Simpson back in 1936 if she married The King morganatically, but it was rejected by the Baldwin Government. The Sovereign cannot be a Peer as the fount of honour and it is merely a style used when in the Duchy on official business ("HM The Queen The Duke of Lancaster").
Camilla would be Queen Consort as the wife of The King but in her own right as "HM Queen Camilla" for the rest of her life.
I agree the best way to handle the issue would be to create her a Princess of the UK in her own right, but it would have to be done before her husband became King to avoid legislation. She would then have her own title and style and could choose to continue using it even though she is automatically Queen.
I highly doubt this will come to pass as it makes no sense to deny her the right to be Queen when she is entitled to share her husband's titles and styles now.
|

12-09-2012, 03:17 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 353
|
|
This does seem like a very awkward thing, passing special laws and LPs to change her title to Princess Consort, which would perhaps create more attention than just having her automatically become Queen when Charles becomes King. I wish they'd never published that intention, but I guess they thought it was the best choice at the time. Surely Charles, when he becomes King, can simply say he wishes his wife to have full honors as Queen Consort.
__________________
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|