The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1181  
Old 02-19-2019, 08:29 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Somewhere in the U.K, United Kingdom
Posts: 112
Hi because of the fact that the Sovereign's siblings have a place on the Order of Precedence, I was wondering if in the event that Diana had gone on to have more children would these individuals have a place the Order of Precedence during the reign of their sibling William V?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #1182  
Old 02-19-2019, 08:46 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,563
I wouldn't think they would. Any children Diana may have had after her divorce from Charles would not be royal nor would they be in the line of succession to the throne. They may be half siblings to William and Harry but other than that, they would have absolutely no ties to the House of Windsor whatsoever.

If anything, they would be extended family to William V on his mother's side from a different marriage and therefore have no place in the order of precedence whatsoever.
__________________

__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
Reply With Quote
  #1183  
Old 02-19-2019, 09:00 AM
muriel's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
I wouldn't think they would. Any children Diana may have had after her divorce from Charles would not be royal nor would they be in the line of succession to the throne. They may be half siblings to William and Harry but other than that, they would have absolutely no ties to the House of Windsor whatsoever.

If anything, they would be extended family to William V on his mother's side from a different marriage and therefore have no place in the order of precedence whatsoever.
That is right. Similarly, Camilla's children do not and will not have a place on the OofP.
Reply With Quote
  #1184  
Old 02-19-2019, 09:01 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Somewhere in the U.K, United Kingdom
Posts: 112
Thank you for your swift response, this probably has been asked before, but was Diana on the Order of Precedence after the divorce?
Reply With Quote
  #1185  
Old 04-25-2019, 08:25 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NN, Lithuania
Posts: 1,856
the Order of Precedence at the Anzac Day service this afternoon
1. prince Harry
2. prince Richard
3. Catherine
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/04...6192155023.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #1186  
Old 04-25-2019, 10:18 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 753
Thanks for clarifying the order of precedence.

It is sometimes confusing.
Reply With Quote
  #1187  
Old 05-30-2019, 11:28 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Somewhere in the U.K, United Kingdom
Posts: 112
At the time of Charles and Diana's divorce the Palace announced that she would receive invitations to some state and national public occasions. Would that mean that Diana would have been invited to Charles and Camilla's coronation and what precedence would she have enjoyed if she had gone?
Reply With Quote
  #1188  
Old 05-30-2019, 11:31 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,908
Precedence outside of law is a matter for the sovereign. It's the King or Queen who decides such matters.
Reply With Quote
  #1189  
Old 05-30-2019, 11:38 AM
muriel's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal_enthusiast View Post
At the time of Charles and Diana's divorce the Palace announced that she would receive invitations to some state and national public occasions. Would that mean that Diana would have been invited to Charles and Camilla's coronation and what precedence would she have enjoyed if she had gone?
It is difficult to speculate, as we do not know how the relationship between Charles, Camilla and Diana would have developed over time.
Reply With Quote
  #1190  
Old 05-30-2019, 12:01 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal_enthusiast View Post
At the time of Charles and Diana's divorce the Palace announced that she would receive invitations to some state and national public occasions. Would that mean that Diana would have been invited to Charles and Camilla's coronation and what precedence would she have enjoyed if she had gone?

We do know their relationship improved very nicely before her untimely passing. Diana had also accepted Charles’ invite to sail the British isles with him on the last voyage on the Royal Yacht Britannia. I hope their relationship would’ve strengthened enough for her to be invited to the Coronation.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #1191  
Old 06-06-2021, 06:18 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St Thomas, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Posts: 3,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnystar View Post
When I pull the website up on my laptop it shows up differently than you've listed as above.

The screen is essentially divided into thirds - the left two thirds have a "major" family member while the corresponding right third has their spouse or sibling.

Left Side | Right Side
The Prince of Wales | The Duchess of Cornwall
The Duke of Cambridge | The Duchess of Cambridge
The Princess Royal | The Duke of York
The Earl of Wessex | The Countess of Wessex
The Duke of Sussex | The Duchess of Sussex
The Duke of Kent | Princess Alexandra
The Duke of Gloucester | The Duchess of Gloucester
Prince & Princess Michael of Kent
I am glad to see the Princess Royal precede her brothers for, I believe, the first time, even if it is only on the website. I have never understood why she, as the hardest-working royal, is denied that place in the official order of precedence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnystar View Post
I find it interesting that they left off The Duchess of Kent.
While at the same time adding Prince and Princess Michael of Kent back onto the page.
Reply With Quote
  #1192  
Old 06-06-2021, 08:24 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St Thomas, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Posts: 3,662
My mistake; the Duchess of Kent was excluded from the previous version of the page as well.
Reply With Quote
  #1193  
Old 06-08-2021, 11:47 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 753
I wonder why the Duke of Kent and Princess Alexandra of Kent are listed ahead of the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester.
Reply With Quote
  #1194  
Old 06-12-2021, 09:41 PM
morhange's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Springfield, United States
Posts: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fijiro View Post
I wonder why the Duke of Kent and Princess Alexandra of Kent are listed ahead of the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester.
Age, perhaps? Certainly not due to title seniority or place in the family, since Richard's father was the older brother and received his title six years before Edward's father, the younger brother, received his.

But Edward and Alexandra are both older than Richard, so maybe that's why?
__________________
His sense of responsibility is not less than yours or mine. How could we tell right from wrong as simple people in any kind of situation? How could we know that our courage, loyalty and lives were not misused for evil purposes?
Reply With Quote
  #1195  
Old 06-14-2021, 07:11 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St Thomas, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Posts: 3,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by morhange View Post
Age, perhaps? Certainly not due to title seniority or place in the family, since Richard's father was the older brother and received his title six years before Edward's father, the younger brother, received his.

But Edward and Alexandra are both older than Richard, so maybe that's why?
But Prince Michael of Kent is older than the Duke of Gloucester yet is listed below him.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
order of precedence, protocol


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Danish Orders and Monograms davo Royal House of Denmark 216 06-21-2021 06:20 PM
Princess Madeleine at the Ball of the Order of Innocence: 2003 Josefine Princess Madeleine, Chris O'Neill and Family 63 06-15-2015 03:07 PM
Danish Royal Family, Current Events 1: April 2003 - March 2008 Julia Current Events Archive 506 03-23-2008 05:56 PM




Popular Tags
abu dhabi america archie mountbatten-windsor background story baptism biography birth britannia british royal family brownbitcoinqueen camilla camilla parker-bowles camilla parker bowles china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing commonwealth countries countess of snowdon customs daisy doge of venice doll duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex edward vii elizabeth ii family life family tree fashion and style genetics george vi gustaf vi adolf harry and meghan highgrove house of windsor jack brooksbank jewellery king willem-alexander książ castle line of succession list of rulers luxembourg medical meghan markle monarchy nepal nepalese royal jewels plantinum jubilee prince charles of luxembourg prince constantijn prince harry princess alexia (2005 -) princess ariane princess catharina-amalia princess chulabhorn walailak princess ribha queen consort queen maxima queen victoria royal ancestry spain speech sussex suthida swedish queen taiwan tradition unfinished portrait united states of america wales welsh


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×