 |
|

07-09-2005, 10:26 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,554
|
|
I thought it was only his mother who was Catholic? His father lost his place in the succession because he married a catholic.
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
|

07-09-2005, 11:02 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,872
|
|
I think the Earl of St Andrews also converted, as did Lord Nicholas. I'll have a look and see if I can find any documentation. I don't think I'm misremembering, though.
Edited to add:
Here's the page from the royal family's official site:
http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/page389.asp
After the Duke of Kent come the Earl of St Anrews's two daughters and then Lady Helen, so the Earl of St Andrews, Baron Downpatrick, and Lord Nicholas are missing. I thought the Earl had converted to Catholicism as well as marrying a Catholic, but it may just have been Lord Nicholas who converted among the Duke's children.
|

07-09-2005, 11:39 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,554
|
|
This list shows the Earl of St Andrews as being excluded because he married a catholic.
http://www.etoile.co.uk/Rsucc.html
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
|

07-09-2005, 11:42 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,872
|
|
Well, he would certainly have been excluded because of that; I just thought that at some point he'd followed suit. Maybe it was because Lord Nicholas and Lord Downpatrick converted that I thought the Earl was in there too.
I wonder if the daughters will convert when they get older. Usually Catholic parents are expected to raise their children Catholic even if they have a non-Catholic spouse, and that seems to have been what happened with the son.
|

07-09-2005, 11:46 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,554
|
|
This was the issue with Prince Michael. The Pope refused to allow a church wedding because P Michael couldn't give an undertaking that his children would be raised as catholics. Both of his children remain Anglicans.
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
|

07-10-2005, 10:54 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston, United States
Posts: 849
|
|
George is still Anglican. The children were raised Anglicans, but Edward made the personal choice to convert. Sylvana is not considered a devout Catholic, so the Vatican rule about Catholic kids probably didn't come into play. Most press believe Katharine, his grandmother, was the Catholic influence inspiring him to convert.
__________________
Kelly D
|

10-20-2005, 06:27 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Middlesex, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,526
|
|
Does one lose the right to the dukedom when marrying/becoming a catholic? Or is it limited to losing rights in succesion?
|

10-20-2005, 07:56 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,872
|
|
He doesn't lose the right to the Dukedom as a result of becoming Catholic, just to inclusion in the line of succession. If he were HRH, he wouldn't lose that either, just as Prince Michael didn't.
|

10-20-2005, 08:23 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by auntie
Does one lose the right to the dukedom when marrying/becoming a catholic? Or is it limited to losing rights in succesion?
|
No, but he loses his place in the line of succession automatically. The dukedom will continue to pass down as long as there is a male in his line (or a new remainder is issued for a female). Otherwise, the Dukedom returns to the Crown after the death of the last eligible male descendant of HRH Prince George.
|

11-10-2005, 11:35 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southampton, United Kingdom
Posts: 154
|
|
Edward Edmund Maximilian George Windsor, Baron Downpatrick (b. 1988), is the only son of George, Earl of St. Andrews and his wife, Sylvana, Countess of St. Andrews (née Palma Tomaselli). His father is the elder son to HRH Edward, Duke of Kent and his wife Katharine, Duchess of Kent. Lord Downpatrick is heir after his father to the Dukedom of Kent. He converted to Catholicism and therefore, was struck from the British succession, following the examples of his grandmother, the Duchess of Kent, and his uncle Lord Nicholas Windsor. Since his mother is a Roman Catholic, his father was struck from the succession upon marrying her. He has two younger sisters: Lady Marina-Charlotte Windsor, and Lady Amelia Windsor.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Windsor%2C_Lord_Downpatrick"
|

11-10-2005, 11:43 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,629
|
|
He will in time after the death of his grandfather and father be known as His Grace, The Duke of Kent, Earl of St. Andrews, Baron Downpatrick.
He does not lose his right to the duchy title of Kent even though he is now a Catholic.
|

11-10-2005, 01:32 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,872
|
|
No, he doesn't, but the Kent dukedom is one of the traditional royal dukedoms, and I'm not sure that it's going to be allowed to carry on in the present bloodline for ever.
|

11-10-2005, 02:29 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,629
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth
No, he doesn't, but the Kent dukedom is one of the traditional royal dukedoms, and I'm not sure that it's going to be allowed to carry on in the present bloodline for ever.
|
Actually, he will be.
The dukedom will not revert back. Just as Alexander Windsor, Earl of Ulster, will one day be His Grace, the Duke of Gloucester.
It carries on till the male line bloodline dies out.
|

11-10-2005, 02:31 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Den Haag, Netherlands
Posts: 520
|
|
Has any1 got ane pics of Edward?.. i saw 1 pic a long time ago n hes reli hott..ill try to see if i can find it
|

11-11-2005, 01:37 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 177
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth
I think the Earl of St Andrews also converted, as did Lord Nicholas. I'll have a look and see if I can find any documentation. I don't think I'm misremembering, though.
Edited to add:
Here's the page from the royal family's official site:
http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/page389.asp
After the Duke of Kent come the Earl of St Anrews's two daughters and then Lady Helen, so the Earl of St Andrews, Baron Downpatrick, and Lord Nicholas are missing. I thought the Earl had converted to Catholicism as well as marrying a Catholic, but it may just have been Lord Nicholas who converted among the Duke's children.
|
Have any of them made any comments as to why they converted? I have read Diana's late mother Frances converted to Catholicism as well and I am curious to know why.
|

11-11-2005, 02:30 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,398
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lady_windsor
Has any1 got ane pics of Edward?.. i saw 1 pic a long time ago n hes reli hott..ill try to see if i can find it
|
Dude-ettes, I have not seen a pic of Downpatrick since Diana's funeral. He was like 9 years old or something last I saw him on TV and in pics at the funeral for Diana, Princess of Wales.
He's at Eton now.
He went Catholic like his mom, and is definitely at Eton.
I'd love to see new pics of him.
|

11-11-2005, 04:37 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 177
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasiraghiTrio
Dude-ettes, I have not seen a pic of Downpatrick since Diana's funeral. He was like 9 years old or something last I saw him on TV and in pics at the funeral for Diana, Princess of Wales.
He's at Eton now, though. Even though he went Catholic like his mom. He is definitely at Eton.
I'd love to see new pics of him.
|
Is one not permitted to go to Eton if one is Catholic?
|

11-11-2005, 11:07 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Den Haag, Netherlands
Posts: 520
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Mary I
Is one not permitted to go to Eton if one is Catholic?
|
dunno ..i tink eton might be a school for mixed christian religions because when i went to a boarding school, we aslo had some catholic people
|

11-11-2005, 11:12 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,398
|
|
No, no. Warren the mod sent me a PM about this... sorry to confuse you. Eton allows all walks of life (Islam, catholic, protestant, Jewish... whatever). All I meant was that Eton is officially a Church of England (meaning Anglican) school. I expected Downpatrick to go to an officially Catholic school, since his religion seems important to him. Why else would he make such a point to be Catholic even though he loses his place in the succession? So I was just surprised he chose Eton, or his parents chose it, but maybe Eton has a program that interests him more than any other academic course. If he is into science, for example, Eton has a spectacular science department. They have amazing facilities for the sciences. I understand they are very well-known especially for their science education.
|

11-11-2005, 11:16 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,872
|
|
Going to Eton seems to be a tradition in the family, so his name was probably down for Eton from the time he was born.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|