US Royal Watcher
Royal Highness
- Joined
- May 12, 2012
- Messages
- 1,968
- City
- Washington
- Country
- United States
Nobody is saying that Charles should totally fund Harry's life in the U.S. Harry and Meghan reached lucrative deals with Spotify and Netflix. But the security being taken away from Harry and his family is a sore spot. Harry said it happened suddenly and he had no idea that it was going to be taken away. A major part of the interview was Harry and Meghan talking about security. My opinion is that Charles ignores the depth of Harry's feelings about this and his feeling of being let down by his father at his own peril. He will be estranged from his son forever.
It’s obvious that you are a very devoted fan of Harry and Meghan, and I was in the past, but I disagree the suggestion that Charles should pay for security because Harry really wants him to is analogous to a parent giving a toddler ice cream because the toddler really wants it. At some point, all of us have to realize that other people’s feelings are as important as their own.
With respect to the cost of security, that was part of the discussion when Meghan and Harry jumped the gun and announced that they were going to “step back” as senior royals.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51040751
Queen Mathilde pointed out that Canada had initially offered to pay for their security but the offer was withdrawn when the taxpayers objected (post 538). I can’t blame them because according to the article below, the Canadian taxpayers spent at least $40,000 for about six weeks of security. What were the Canadians going to receive in exchange for paying their security?
https://observer.com/2020/06/prince-harry-meghan-markle-canada-security-costs-canadian-taxpayers/
As an aside, Harry and Meghan had more than a month’s notice that their security was going to be cut off – and the discussions were going on before this announcement was made.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51636835
My guess is that it never occurred to Harry and Meghan that Canada would (or could) withdraw its offer. Harry didn’t want to pay for it himself and, even though it was Harry’s choice to walk away and lose his public funded security, he called Dad demanding that Dad shell out the money for his security.
I understand that Harry and Meghan are at a higher risk because he was born into the royal family. But at the same time, Harry’s money (including payments from Netflix and Spotify) is also due to his royal status. He wants all of the advantages but none of the disadvantages. That is not how life works.
Even more outrageous is that after publicly trashing his father, Harry had the nerve to express his intention of making “healing” their relationship a priority. This is the equivalent of someone punching you knowing that you won’t punch back and then refusing to apologize while saying that he hopes you can still be friends. If his relationship with his father is truly a priority, he would have refrained from making it worse.
I suspect that although Charles is still angry, he will forgive Harry (and probably already has). Harry will continue to be a very loved son, but Harry has a lot of work to do to heal the relationship. The first thing that Harry should do is drop the demand that Charles pay for his bills and the last thing that Charles should do is to agree to pay them.
Last edited: