 |
|

05-03-2010, 09:32 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 13,142
|
|
Personally, I don't see a problem with Marie going out with her friends to party without her husband. And I don't see a problem with Joachim to do the same as well. Not every marriage is the same, but I think some marriages benefit with the parties involved are allowed to go and hang out with their friends and have fun. You had a social life and friends before you got married, why should you stop doign that. If a married couple each have a night out a month, as they long as they go out together (by themselves without the kids) what is the problem?
Its a problem when Marie, or Joachim or whoever is married and they are partying every week two to three times a week. At that point you have to say...okay...whats the deal? If you are going to party like you are single....why be married? Really, I think I everyone is entitled to a night to have fun as long as your spouse is okay with it and nothing is going on. As someone previously mentioned, trust is key. If you don't trust your partner, and your partner hasn't shown that you can't trust them..then what do you have?
|

05-04-2010, 06:17 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Guimarães, Portugal
Posts: 815
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zonk
Personally, I don't see a problem with Marie going out with her friends to party without her husband. And I don't see a problem with Joachim to do the same as well. Not every marriage is the same, but I think some marriages benefit with the parties involved are allowed to go and hang out with their friends and have fun. You had a social life and friends before you got married, why should you stop doign that. If a married couple each have a night out a month, as they long as they go out together (by themselves without the kids) what is the problem?
Its a problem when Marie, or Joachim or whoever is married and they are partying every week two to three times a week. At that point you have to say...okay...whats the deal? If you are going to party like you are single....why be married? Really, I think I everyone is entitled to a night to have fun as long as your spouse is okay with it and nothing is going on. As someone previously mentioned, trust is key. If you don't trust your partner, and your partner hasn't shown that you can't trust them..then what do you have?
|
I'll make mine your words.
|

05-08-2010, 03:55 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****, Colombia
Posts: 522
|
|
I didn't know Marie smokes!
|

05-08-2010, 10:00 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ~, United States
Posts: 525
|
|
There were pictures taken during her honeymoon in which she was smoking.
|

05-08-2010, 11:36 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****, Colombia
Posts: 522
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rylt11
There were pictures taken during her honeymoon in which she was smoking.
|
Oh...I don't know them
|

05-09-2010, 05:43 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Düsseldorf, Germany
Posts: 458
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahtikavalentine
Oh...I don't know them 
|
http://msndk.starlounge.com/index.cfm?objectid=27110
In the second one you can see them both holding cigarettes.
|

05-11-2010, 07:12 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 16,448
|
|
According to Billed Bladet #19, 2010, la Marie and Joachim will not go to Sweden to the wedding in June, along with the rest of the DRF.
Joachim will stay in Denmark and act as regent (actually rigsforstander, as only the crown prince can be regent).
QMII & PH were of course expected to go anyway and as Frederik and Victoria are very close it would be almost unthinkable that he and Mary did not go.
Princess Benedikte also has as close relationship with her Swedish relatives.
So that leaves Joachim, who hasn't got that close bonds with his Swedish relatives anyway.
Well, poor petite Marie will have to watch the wedding on TV I guess. (The article states very clearly that she will not go either).
|

05-11-2010, 07:40 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Guimarães, Portugal
Posts: 815
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muhler
According to Billed Bladet #19, 2010, la Marie and Joachim will not go to Sweden to the wedding in June, along with the rest of the DRF.
Joachim will stay in Denmark and act as regent (actually rigsforstander, as only the crown prince can be regent).
QMII & PH were of course expected to go anyway and as Frederik and Victoria are very close it would be almost unthinkable that he and Mary did not go.
Princess Benedikte also has as close relationship with her Swedish relatives.
So that leaves Joachim, who hasn't got that close bonds with his Swedish relatives anyway.
Well, poor petite Marie will have to watch the wedding on TV I guess. (The article states very clearly that she will not go either).
|
Why "poor"?
|

05-11-2010, 07:48 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 189
|
|

Because she might miss a wonderful event, the greatest one of the year so far. Isn't it?
|

05-11-2010, 08:19 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Guimarães, Portugal
Posts: 815
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katelle

Because she might miss a wonderful event, the greatest one of the year so far. Isn't it?
|
Ok. I think that everyone who follows royalty knows that the wedding of Crown Princess Victoria it´s "the greatest one of the year so far". That´s not the question.
But why "poor" princess Marie?
|

05-11-2010, 08:51 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 189
|
|

Actually I cannot speak in Muhler's place, but I am a regular reader of his article translations and he likes to add some humour in them, like when he says "la Marie" or "petite Marie" etc. Don't take it bad, it's just for fun! I guess.
|

05-11-2010, 06:11 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 16,448
|
|
It is indeed just for fun.
In fact I'm often teased for being an almost fanatical admirer of la Marie and her Joachim.  - That is not quite true, however.
Poor Marie, because I believe she would very much have liked to go to that wedding. (She doesn't strike me as a person who would rather stay at home than go to a party). It is after all not the same watching it on TV than being there in person.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katelle

Actually I cannot speak in Muhler's place, but I am a regular reader of his article translations and he likes to add some humour in them, like when he says "la Marie" or "petite Marie" etc. Don't take it bad, it's just for fun! I guess.
|
|

05-11-2010, 06:22 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The, United States
Posts: 1,994
|
|
I don't see why Marie couldn't still go to the wedding with the rest of the family if she really wanted to? It is only Joachim who cannot attend because of his duties.
|

05-11-2010, 06:32 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 16,448
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanaz
I don't see why Marie couldn't still go to the wedding with the rest of the family if she really wanted to? It is only Joachim who cannot attend because of his duties.
|
Solidarity with her husband?
And the fact that she hardly knows Joachim's Swedish relatives or certainly don't know them well.
|

05-12-2010, 06:25 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Guimarães, Portugal
Posts: 815
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muhler
Solidarity with her husband?
And the fact that she hardly knows Joachim's Swedish relatives or certainly don't know them well.
|
Well, so that would be the perfect opportunity for her (Princess Marie) to know Joachim's Swedish relatives wouldn't it?
But we all know that she cannot do whatever she wants (in this case, go to a wedding just because she wants). She is restrained now (i think) by the DRF, by the protocol, call it what you want.
|

05-12-2010, 01:53 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hiawassee, United States
Posts: 637
|
|
One of the names they gave baby Henrik was in honor of Joachim's Swedish relative
|

05-12-2010, 02:15 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Prosper, TX, United States
Posts: 617
|
|
CP Frederik could easily escort Marie, along with Mary, as he did with Mette-Marit at one of his mother's birthday events when CP Haakon was delayed. I hope she does go as I think it would help further her relationships with the European royal circle in general and I'd like to see her, too!
|

05-13-2010, 10:49 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: -, France
Posts: 22,971
|
|
What a pitty that they wont make it. I was really looking forward to seeing them there.
|

05-13-2010, 02:03 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hiawassee, United States
Posts: 637
|
|
The Danish Royals will be staying on the Yacht Dannebrog (which would be considered Danish soil)
Due to what happened and the deaths of all the government officials in Poland, the Danish government would want Joachim to remain in Denmark...............................
Even William & Harry now have to fly in seperate planes when they go to Africa next month.......it is logical !
Christian will attend the wedding as he has some part in it............I assume they Isabella won't be left behind with the nanny but will be with them on the yacht
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|