 |
|

02-02-2017, 03:51 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
Camilla look her best in single strand necklaces and I think she looks great.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

02-02-2017, 04:05 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: cairo, Egypt
Posts: 641
|
|
finally she wore something different than the pearl choker  .
|

02-02-2017, 04:48 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
|
|
Probably my favourite of the Duchess' necklaces [a close win over her Amethyst 'Heart']. The simplicity and elegance of its design simply sing out.
|

02-02-2017, 07:59 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,333
|
|
Do we have a source for this necklace?
__________________
This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
|

02-02-2017, 08:06 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NN, Lithuania
Posts: 1,912
|
|
|

02-03-2017, 12:52 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,596
|
|
Good to see the emeralds emerge again, it had been a long time.
|

02-03-2017, 01:36 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,907
|
|
I love her emeralds. Camilla rocks the big jewels, tiaras and necklaces. Even if old and not as fashionable as Sophie and Kate, when it comes to jewels she is the most exciting. She does justice to the queen's big bling like none other.
But the emeralds are her private pieces. Boy do the middle eastern royals gift them some incredible bling. Diana got sapphires , Camilla emeralds. Her ruby collars are also from Saudi Arabia. The queen got diamonds.
|

02-03-2017, 01:42 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Just not a fan of that setting at all...not my style.
I want to like them...but they don't appeal to me.
LaRae
|

02-04-2017, 01:09 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: -, United States
Posts: 11,724
|
|
The Cubitt Tiara | The Court Jeweller
A beautiful and elegant tiara. Its simply stunning.
|

02-04-2017, 02:45 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,907
|
|
Beautiful tiara. Not very often a commoner bride brings a tiara in.
Seems odd seeing her in such a small tiara though. She rocks the big ones.
|

02-04-2017, 11:17 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The Blue Ocean, United States
Posts: 174
|
|
I'm not wild about the design of that tiara, though the stones are quite nice. I dont like the way the center portion sticks way up by itself.
|

02-04-2017, 11:35 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,895
|
|
I'm almost positive the emeralds and rubies are official gifts from Saudis. They are Camilla's to use but officially belong to the Crown.
The same for the jewels given to Sophie Wessex by Bahrain.
|

02-04-2017, 07:56 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 3,010
|
|
The commoner bride's grandmother was King Edward VII's mistress. Lots of perks. Diana was a commoner, although, an aristocrat, she had her own tiara, too.
|

02-04-2017, 11:09 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,907
|
|
Diana was an aristocrat, while not Royal, certainly not in the commoner ranks. She didn't have her own tiara. The spencer tiara belongs to the wife of earl spencer. Or the daughters of the earl can borrow it.
Camilla may come from the gentry, but she is a commoner. She has some aristocratic blood but far back and minor.
|

02-05-2017, 10:35 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,895
|
|
Anyone who is not The Queen or the holder of a substantive peerage is a commoner.
Nobility does not extend to the wife or children of a peer. As posh as Diana was, she was still a commoner by the British definition
|

02-05-2017, 11:30 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 12,835
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph
Anyone who is not The Queen or the holder of a substantive peerage is a commoner.
Nobility does not extend to the wife or children of a peer. As posh as Diana was, she was still a commoner by the British definition
|
The British definition means that the twin brother of a Peer, born 10 minutes later, from exactly the same parents, having the same DNA, is a "commoner", is most remarkable.
In most continental systems of nobility Diana would have been seen as a "Hochgeboren" (Highborn) and this prestigious noble lady.
|

02-05-2017, 11:33 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
I always understood that Diana was Noble...not a commoner.
LaRae
|

02-05-2017, 11:41 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,895
|
|
'Commoner' comes from the ability to vote in elections for, and sit in, the House of Commons.
It's not a pejorative. Prior to 1999, hereditary peers had been constitutionally disqualified from being electors to, or members of, the House of Commons.
Hereditary peers had always sat in the House of Lords.
The term doesn't mean as much today as hereditary peers can also now sit in the Commons.
|

02-05-2017, 11:47 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 12,835
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
I always understood that Diana was Noble...not a commoner.
LaRae
|
For me Diana is every inch a noble, but in the British system anyone who is no Peer, is a commoner, it seems. Look at the Queen's 4th Prime Minister, Sir Alexander Douglas-Home, 14th Earl of Home. He had to give up his peerage to be able to sit in the House of Commons (what is in a name...).
Upon giving up his peerage, Sir Alec, son of the 13th Earl of Home and of Lady Lilian Lambton (daughter of the 4th Earl of Durham) suddenly became a "commoner" in British eyes while he was of course very well rooted in British aristocracy.
|

02-05-2017, 11:54 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Ah so it's a legal thing too not just a designator....duh, should of realized that.
LaRae
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|