 |
|

03-21-2012, 07:59 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,806
|
|
Unfortunately, that tidbit of information was not made known. I had thought the clasp had been changed since this is also a four-strand necklace as her other one. But maybe it was a gift from Charles, if this report is true.
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
|

03-22-2012, 06:58 PM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alyend
Do you have a photo of the Keppel tiara broken to made new jewellery? And do you have also a photo of the new jewellery made with these diamonds?
|
The Keppel tiara wasn't broken up, it was and remains a versatile necklace/tiara piece (1).
However, a tiara was bought by the Prince of Wales and broken up (2); the stones were used to make the modern diamond necklace (3).
What has previously been described as the Grand Duchess Xenia of Russia brooch was first worn by the DOC in November 2009 (4).
1. The Keppel Diamond & Ruby necklace/tiara worn while still Camilla Parker-Bowles.
2. The tiara bought by the POW and subsequently broken up.
3. The modern diamond necklace (worn while still Camilla Parker-Bowles) this pic March 2011.
4. The Grand Duchess Xenia brooch, worn in Canada, November 2009.
Images cropped from larger photographs and not subject to copyright restriction
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

03-22-2012, 07:18 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,806
|
|
I don't care for the diamond daisy necklace too much and wish that lovely tiara wasn't broken up for parts. And thanks for confirming about the provenance of the cabochon sapphire brooch, Warren, and to Artemisia for identifying it correctly in the first place.
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
|

03-22-2012, 07:25 PM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nico
|
You are absolutely correct, thanks for picking up my error quickly.
Apologies, I misread my notes; post now amended.
Since it's been mentioned after I posted it incorrectly above, here it is again:
The Daisy Diamond Necklace, worn at the White House November 2005
Image cropped from larger photograph and not subject to copyright restriction
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

03-22-2012, 07:30 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,276
|
|
Maybe its the way it is displayed but that tiara looks very bridal shop.
|

03-22-2012, 07:30 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,806
|
|
Now that is a gorgeous diamond necklace, so I guess the tiara was well sacrificed. Maybe Charles saw the potential of the stones to be used for other pieces since the tiara might be considered too lightweight for Camilla's mighty hair. It also looked more suitable for a younger royal lady.
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
|

03-22-2012, 10:53 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Troy, United States
Posts: 4,156
|
|
Agreed! Charles has a good eye if he indeed saw the potential for a gorgeous necklace. The tiara in it's original form would have suited Catherine... The Duchess has some incredible jewels to choose from.
|

03-23-2012, 06:17 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,564
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
The Keppel tiara wasn't broken up, it was and remains a versatile necklace/tiara piece (1).
However, a tiara was bought by the Prince of Wales and broken up (2); the stones were used to make the modern diamond necklace (3).
What has previously been described as the Grand Duchess Xenia of Russia brooch was first worn by the DOC in November 2009 (4).
1. The Keppel Diamond & Ruby necklace/tiara worn while still Camilla Parker-Bowles.
2. The tiara bought by the POW and subsequently broken up.
3. The modern diamond necklace (worn while still Camilla Parker-Bowles) this pic March 2011.
4. The Grand Duchess Xenia brooch, worn in Canada, November 2009.
Images cropped from larger photographs and not subject to copyright restriction
|
Are you sure the modern diamond necklace referred to in 3 above was used by Camilla prior to her wedding to Charles? AFAIK, its first public debut was in the US in late 2005 on their first royal trip together
|

03-23-2012, 07:23 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel
Are you sure the modern diamond necklace referred to in 3 above was used by Camilla prior to her wedding to Charles? AFAIK, its first public debut was in the US in late 2005 on their first royal trip together
|
Apparently, this picture of Camilla wearing the same (or similar) necklace was taken back in 1990's.
You'll learn more if you read these posts by Warren ( post 1, post 2) and by joye. ( post)
|

03-23-2012, 09:45 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,054
|
|
The GD Xenia brooch is a masterpiece, thank you for bringing it to our attention Warren!!
|

03-23-2012, 10:04 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,564
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia
Apparently, this picture of Camilla wearing the same (or similar) necklace was taken back in 1990's.
You'll learn more if you read these posts by Warren ( post 1, post 2) and by joye. ( post)
|
Thank you for the link to the previous discussion on the necklace.
At the time it was suggested (and it remains my belief) that the photo is not from the 1990s but from the group of photos taken at the time of C&C's first wedding anniversary. A number of pictures were taken then, including one of Camilla in a white column dress and the turquoise parure last seen in Oslo; another one of her in jeans and a blazer on a bench in the garden of CH and this one.
|

03-23-2012, 11:26 AM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by countess felicitas
I don't know if anybody has answered already, but I found a good reference on the RJWMB:
Royal Jewels of the World Message Board: Re: The Duchess of Cornwall in Madrid tonight
Quote from Boffer at RJOTWMB:
The necklace was a gift to the then Mrs. Parker-Bowels from the Prince of Wales prior to their marriage.
In the late 1990s the Prince acquired a rather nondescript tiara, and the stones were reset into this necklace and matching earrings.
|
The above post was made some time ago; unfortunately the RJOTWMB does not preserve its posted content indefinitely (like we do here!  ) but we have the quote from an "expert" in the field. None of us know the date when Camilla acquired the necklace; we pick up information along the way, file it away for reference, and hope that most of it at least is fairly accurate. There may have been good reason for Camilla's reticence to wear this jewel publicly prior to 2005 (apart from a photo shoot), but that gets into the realm of the purely speculative and we simply don't know.
The image I posted of the tiara which is said to have been broken up to make the necklace came from the same source at the RJOTWMB. From my recollection it was generally accepted at the time so I would like to believe the information is accurate, with the caveat that the subject of Royal Jewels relies very much on the knowledge of a very few people and even the Royal website has at times been contradictory or in error.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

03-23-2012, 12:09 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,564
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel
Thank you for the link to the previous discussion on the necklace.
At the time it was suggested (and it remains my belief) that the photo is not from the 1990s but from the group of photos taken at the time of C&C's first wedding anniversary. A number of pictures were taken then, including one of Camilla in a white column dress and the turquoise parure last seen in Oslo; another one of her in jeans and a blazer on a bench in the garden of CH and this one.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
The above post was made some time ago; unfortunately the RJOTWMB does not preserve its posted content indefinitely (like we do here!  ) but we have the quote from an "expert" in the field. None of us know the date when Camilla acquired the necklace; we pick up information along the way, file it away for reference, and hope that most of it at least is fairly accurate. There may have been good reason for Camilla's reticence to wear this jewel publicly prior to 2005 (apart from a photo shoot), but that gets into the realm of the purely speculative and we simply don't know.
The image I posted of the tiara which is said to have been broken up to make the necklace came from the same source at the RJOTWMB. From my recollection it was generally accepted at the time so I would like to believe the information is accurate, with the caveat that the subject of Royal Jewels relies very much on the knowledge of a very few people and even the Royal website has at times been contradictory or in error.
|
Very informative and well argued post from Warren, as usual  .
The reason I persist with my theory of the 1st anniversary photoshoot is that the Camilla's hairstyle is very similar to the other pictures of the time. From memory, some of the pictures at the time were criticised for being quite heavily photoshopped.
|

03-26-2012, 02:44 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Lincoln, United Kingdom
Posts: 28
|
|
Looks like the necklace Camilla is wearing tonight is either the modern diamond tiara she wore in Spain (she's also wearing the same Bruce oldfield dress she wore then) but i'm not sure if its the necklace that Sophie Wessex wore to the Swedish royal wedding, can't tell from a distance :S
|

03-26-2012, 02:47 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|

I think she is wearing this modern diamond necklace.
Edit: We have better pictures now and it's definitely the modern diamond necklace.
|

03-26-2012, 04:49 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,806
|
|
A gorgeous, delicate necklace and stunning earrings to match. I believe a tiara purchased by Charles was broken down for the diamonds in the necklace.
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
|

03-26-2012, 05:14 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: -, United States
Posts: 11,705
|
|
Love that Daisy Diamond necklace!
|

03-26-2012, 05:33 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: My own head, United States
Posts: 8,101
|
|
Thank you for the pictures. The necklace is absolutely stunning. The earrings are a great match too.
__________________
"My guiding principles in life are to be honest, genuine, thoughtful and caring".
~Prince William~
I'm not obsessed with royalty...I just think intensely about it.
|

03-27-2012, 12:07 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|
Could anyone identify the brooch Camilla wore for a reception at British Embassy in Stockholm?
Picture cropped from a much larger image and constitutes less than 20% of the original.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|