 |
|

06-10-2010, 09:42 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: *********, Spain
Posts: 1,302
|
|
When the coffin of Princess Dina passes in front of the Queen of England, Queen inclined her head. Was gesture of Queen Elizabeth II hypocritical?
|

06-10-2010, 10:04 AM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 228
|
|
Queen Frederika did not just bow or acknowdge the new queen of Greece, she performed a curtsy which is an entirely different story - please consult the video again
|

06-10-2010, 05:29 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: *********, Spain
Posts: 1,302
|
|
I think that the problem is not in gesture, it is in the word that you have used for define the gesture of Queen Federika "hypocritical".It is true the Queen Federika was the Queen, she had not to make a curtsy, but it is not a hypocritical gesture, she wanted that her gesture symbolized the fact that Greece had a new Queen.
|

06-10-2010, 05:45 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: here and there, Greece
Posts: 537
|
|
Many people then viewed that gesture as hypocritical in a way . When Frederika curtsied in from of Anne Marie she made a statement, she acted in a way that showed she believed Greece had another Queen from that moment and that she was nothing more that the Dowager Queen, the King's mother. Yet many people, including royalists didn't believe that the Queen ment it, they were sure that she would not remove herself from the spotlight and that she would not stop interfering with matters that were unconstitutionally irrelevant to her, the same way she acted during Paul's reing. That's why that gesture was characterized as hypocritical by many many people
|

06-11-2010, 07:11 AM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 228
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BELTRANEJA
I think that the problem is not in gesture, it is in the word that you have used for define the gesture of Queen Federika "hypocritical".It is true the Queen Federika was the Queen, she had not to make a curtsy, but it is not a hypocritical gesture, she wanted that her gesture symbolized the fact that Greece had a new Queen.
|
What I said was that it was considered which means that this is how it was perceived by various parties at the time not how it is perceived by me, although I do not disagree with that interpretation. And I fully agree with Sunflower's analysis.
|

08-01-2010, 09:35 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ****, Canada
Posts: 1,525
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BELTRANEJA
When the coffin of Princess Diana passes in front of the Queen of England, Queen inclined her head. Was gesture of Queen Elizabeth II hypocritical?
|
No the gesture was not hypocritical but you know the Greek saying "Greece eats its children"So no matter what Frederika did even to be positive; like knowing about five languages.perfect protocols etc.. was always regarded badly by the Greeks for some reason.She curtseyed and I think it was genuine.
People love to speculate do they not?
|

08-01-2010, 10:26 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 1,160
|
|
Yes, they do love to speculate and I think Queen Elizabeth was literally "bowing" to public pressure by inclining her head as the coffin of her ex-daughter-in-law passed before the Queen. What Frederika did was acknowledge a new reigning consort, although not reigning for long, unfortunately.
|

08-02-2010, 06:43 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 2,634
|
|
[QUOTE=Vlaha Karatsokaros;1091589]A majesty does not bow to another majesty except in the case I indicated above.
Used to think this way, too. But both Queen Mary curtseyed her son and daughter-in-law at their 1937 coronation, as well as she did when she met her granddaughter Elizabeth for the first time after she came home from Africa after the sudden death of King George VI.
Elizabeth, the Queen Mother curtsey twice at her daughters coronation in 1953.
So you cannot say a Majesty never curtseys another Majesty in general.
|

08-26-2010, 11:32 AM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 228
|
|
You are wrong. In fact, I have already quoted precisely what you claim above as exceptions. So you are only agreeing with me.
The difference, lies with the fact that Frederika was correct to bow to her son, but incorrect to bow to her daughter-in-law.
When Queen Mary bowed to Queen Elizabeth II and so did her mother at the coronation in 1953, the rationale was that these majesties were just consorts of sovereigns, while Elizabeth II was sovereign majesty. Thus, Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth, The Queen Mother were bowing to the sovereign ruler of the United Kingdom.
There is a huge difference, between a queen-consort and a sovereign queen.
Both Frederika and Anne-Marie were consort-queens. Thus, the did not have to bow to one-another, except perhaps Anne-Marie to her mother-in-law, as brides do their mother-in-law [Greek custom].
|

08-26-2010, 05:24 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 1,160
|
|
You may have a point there. Elizabeth II is Queen regnant, whereas both Mary and Elizabeth were queen consorts. But since the queen consort is also acknowledged as "Your Majesty" wouldn't it be proper for a dowager queen to curtsy to her daughter-in-law if that daughter-in-law is the queen consort? Wouldn't the current queen consort be the first among equals when compared to a dowager queen?
|

08-26-2010, 05:49 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 228
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasillisos Markos
You may have a point there. Elizabeth II is Queen regnant, whereas both Mary and Elizabeth were queen consorts. But since the queen consort is also acknowledged as "Your Majesty" wouldn't it be proper for a dowager queen to curtsy to her daughter-in-law if that daughter-in-law is the queen consort? Wouldn't the current queen consort be the first among equals when compared to a dowager queen?
|
A first among equals for sure, but this would be no reason to declare obedience to. Obedience is declared only to the sovereign ruler of a country/nation. Neither Frederika, nor Anne-Marie were symbol of the nation nor did they play a specific constitutional role.
|

08-27-2010, 08:28 AM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|

The correct term is obeisance, not obedience.
An obeisance is a bow or curtsey or other respectful gesture, homage or deference.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

08-27-2010, 11:13 AM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 228
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren

The correct term is obeisance, not obedience.
An obeisance is a bow or curtsey or other respectful gesture, homage or deference.
|
And obeisance it is, with my apologies for the error. Obeisance, usually through curtsy or other gesture, indicates respect toward the sovereignty of a monarch and, by extrapolation, his/her representatives.
Thank you.
|

08-27-2010, 04:09 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 1,160
|
|
And thus, why not have a dowager queen show obeisance not only to the sovereign but also the sovereign's consort? Is this something which is simply not done?
|

08-29-2010, 12:04 AM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 228
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasillisos Markos
And thus, why not have a dowager queen show obeisance not only to the sovereign but also the sovereign's consort? Is this something which is simply not done?
|
It is not done. And it is not done, I think, because a sovereign's consort holds no cosntitutional office such that another majesty should show obeisance to. But I would love to hear dissenting opinions on the matter.
|

08-30-2010, 01:22 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 1,160
|
|
I don't believe others show obeisance to the King because of the constitutional office but they bow and curtsy because he is the King. The Queen is the wife of the King, his consort, and is addressed as "Your Majesty." Again, what is wrong with a dowager queen bowing or showing obeisance to the wife of the King. Wouldn't this be similar to a show of order of precedence?
|

08-31-2010, 06:40 PM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|

Yes, a curtsey from one family member to another seems an odd point of criticism.
I'm sure there are greater issues for which the late Queen can be held to task rather than her gesture of showing homage/deference/respect to the new Queen Consort.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

09-01-2010, 07:02 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 1,160
|
|
@Warren,
Hear, hear! Well put.
|

09-02-2010, 04:47 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: TORINO, Italy
Posts: 615
|
|
Is the bowing you are talking about the one around minute 4 of this video?
|

09-02-2010, 06:09 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 1,160
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amedea
Is the bowing you are talking about the one around minute 4 of this video?
|
Thank you for posting this video!  If Frederika is the woman wearing the feathered hat, then it appears both women (Anne-Marie and Frederika) curtsied to one another, which is nice, and supports my opinion that it is a show of respect from one queen who is now a dowager to the queen consort. And vice versa.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|