Everyone forgets that Delphine was outed by a writer of a biography. When the news broke, Delphine called her father because her mother was depressed and neither was sure how to handle the media. Instead of sympathy Albert nastily told her he could care less about her or her mother, that he was not her father (all of the sudden he says this in her adulthood?). He finished by telling her never to call again before slamming the phone down.
Any child would be hurt in that situation. As if that were not enough, Delphine was "uninvited" to a dinner because the Crown Prince, her brother, would be there. She wad told that he would be embarrassed by her very presence.
At that point her mother went to the media demanding her child be treated like a human being. She did not choose to be born. She is not an embarrassment, she is a human being. In retaliation for coming forward with the truth, her legal father disowned her.
Delphine says that the King or his wife retaliated against her. Imagine if the Prime Minister of a country you live in was making a point of negative remarks about you. People stop their friendships, business partners and clients shy away not wanting to be on his bad side. Now your reputation and livelihood are at stake.
What choice does she have? She IS THE VICTIM of these persons actions. There is no justice or end for her.
When Prince Albert of Monaco talked about the special bond he and King Albert have, with a wink, there was no doubt in my mind that neither one feels sorry about the mess they have made for the children they sired. They are coddled, self-centered men.
Delphine should take this all the way to the World Court for what has been done and said about her. She would win because she has rights as a human to be treated fairly no matter how much Albert refuses to 'consider' himself her father. He walked away not only with incredible cruelty (for a very 'pious' catholic monarch, no less) but treated her like a piece of rubbish. Any person who has no problem hurting their flesh and blood like that is not someone I could trust in power.
As for Paola, she is no saint. The "fighting to save her marriage" bull was only because Baudouin said a divorce meant abdication. As for the supposed piety, a truly pious person would have mercy on the innocent because all are equal. Revenge is certainly not the act if a pious person.
Any child would be hurt in that situation. As if that were not enough, Delphine was "uninvited" to a dinner because the Crown Prince, her brother, would be there. She wad told that he would be embarrassed by her very presence.
At that point her mother went to the media demanding her child be treated like a human being. She did not choose to be born. She is not an embarrassment, she is a human being. In retaliation for coming forward with the truth, her legal father disowned her.
Delphine says that the King or his wife retaliated against her. Imagine if the Prime Minister of a country you live in was making a point of negative remarks about you. People stop their friendships, business partners and clients shy away not wanting to be on his bad side. Now your reputation and livelihood are at stake.
What choice does she have? She IS THE VICTIM of these persons actions. There is no justice or end for her.
When Prince Albert of Monaco talked about the special bond he and King Albert have, with a wink, there was no doubt in my mind that neither one feels sorry about the mess they have made for the children they sired. They are coddled, self-centered men.
Delphine should take this all the way to the World Court for what has been done and said about her. She would win because she has rights as a human to be treated fairly no matter how much Albert refuses to 'consider' himself her father. He walked away not only with incredible cruelty (for a very 'pious' catholic monarch, no less) but treated her like a piece of rubbish. Any person who has no problem hurting their flesh and blood like that is not someone I could trust in power.
As for Paola, she is no saint. The "fighting to save her marriage" bull was only because Baudouin said a divorce meant abdication. As for the supposed piety, a truly pious person would have mercy on the innocent because all are equal. Revenge is certainly not the act if a pious person.
Last edited: