That might well be the truth! Still I think on feeding the media monster he makes people more aware of it, about what is happening to people like him who were born into the public interest and had no choice. Meghan could have gone to work of a bank or as a cook or into internatioanl business, she didn't need to become an actress. It is sad, that she found that on marrying into the BRF, she couldn't cope with it. Maybe she could have, though, if it wasn't for marrying Harry who wanted to be in and out at the same time. We'll never know. Marrying an "insider" who turns out not to be able to support you enough "inside" is a hard fate.
We have no idea if Meghan was not hurt so much by her family's decision to work with the papers against her that she really felt like a victim and when the going got tough, Harry decided it was "just like with my mom" and, trained to make tough decisions as a soldier, decided to "get out to save her" no matter the costs. And when they were stripped of Dad's support, he saw no other way than to sell his story under the cape of "helping others" and Meghan led them back to a place where she knew some people and some of the rules. I doubt that their "happiness" played a role in all of that!
But think of them however you want, it is a fact that the British media made it their game to make Meghan feel so unwelcome that going away looked good while there. And for me, they had racist motives. I am happy that Harry won't go quiet and thus exposes the media's machinations, even if it is surely hard for Charles to hear what his younger son thinks and how hard it was for both William and Harry to grow up with the knowledge that the media hunted their mother down to her death (no matter why she died in that tunnel, but the paps were there! And the inquest into her death laid bare the role of the media in all of this.) and is now trying to do the same to his wife.
And what all of us try to explain or not to explain why Harry and Meghan do what they do and don't do what they don't do, all the while not knowing enough about the inner feelings of the BRF and believing even the "Sun" or the "Daily Mail" - it is surely not even close to the truth, because the only ones who talk - Meghan and Harry - are not believed here. So yeah, it is a sad threat for these normally so interesting forums. IMHO, of course. But I do hope that Harry keeps on talking or even ranting. And I truly believe the future king should not do it along with him but I can understand William when it comes to their mother's death and I doubt he would have said anything if not for Harry having been open before. For it is not only Harry who profits from the BRF not saying anything against the media, it the media themselves. And the fact that the article that I posted from the Guardian, who was about that, was ignored here (apart from being accused of raising the flag of a British republic) tells me enough. I am proud of Harry and Meghan that they take on the truly disgusting British papers, I hope they'll go on doing that and that the papers one day learn that as long as there are other papers and the net who support Harry, they can't no longer get away with the truly atrocious things they have submitted the BRF to.
Hi Curry....yes of course that could be the case. But the way the question was posed, and the way it was answered by Harry seem pretty unequivocal. It was Meghan who "saw right away" that he needed help. Harry could have easily qualified his statement by saying that she is the one who suggested he go BACK INTO THERAPY.
