If anything can make Charles reluctant to leave money to a branch of his family, its the way that H is behaving.I also personally think that Charles will leave his personal money to all his grandchildren, even if he never meets them. He's not the type to disinherit (IMHO).
Are the formal entails that form the backbone of most Austen novels still used?
H'es probably reluctant to call her a liar.. She is sitll a member of the queen's family.. and as such, its not that easy to bluntly speak about her publicly...I am still puzzled as to why the Archbishop will not release a statement
If anything can make Charles reluctant to leave money to a branch of his family, its the way that H is behaving.
I am still puzzled as to why the Archbishop will not release a statement
Sorry - unaware of anything hence the asking - not making ironic remark.
Yes and honestly, who knows what will be better for William.
H&M and their growing children will never have enough when being asked.
Unless H. Meghan one day and returns to his family in Uk there will be no end to this drama. Of course the stories they can report will decrease as everybody will be more careful with them but them asking for more money, I doubt will ever stop.
By the way, I wonder what HM's idea is with" they still remain beloved...",
how should this work in daily life. Noone can ever feel safe again that H&M won't tell the media, no family event, no phonecall, nothing is safe,
how do they want to deal with H&M, even if everything was taped, as the RF doesn't comment and Meghan does not hesitate to lie..... never ending drama ahead.
Maybe cutting them off was the best thing for the monarchy and honestly we all know people in our family or a close friends where people happen to be cut off. It's never nice but not so rare. So maybe a cut as harmful as it seems was the best for the family aswell, I doubt that marriage ends well, leave a door open for Harry , wait and see.
?
As soon as HM has died those two will go absolutely crazy beyond imagination, they have shown to have no limits, no respect.... a desaster for both Charles and especially William one day.
H'es probably reluctant to call her a liar.. She is sitll a member of the queen's family.. and as such, its not that easy to bluntly speak about her publicly...
They had a rehearsal, blessing...whatever 3 days earlier that Meghan opted to make sound like was their legal marriage date- and now there is proof that was not the case. That reflects on her, not the AOC. I don’t think he should have to dignify this with a statement.
I also personally think that Charles will leave his personal money to all his grandchildren, even if he never meets them. He's not the type to disinherit (IMHO).
Executive director of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Archewell Foundation steps down after one year to take 'senior advisory' role
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...well-Foundation-leaves-one-year.html#comments
Catherine St-Laurent now resigning... one can't help but wonder why the high turnover of staff in the H&M 'household'.
Believe it or not, there is a positive aspect to Harry and Meghan declaring on international TV that they've been "cut off". If there was anything that could have been done that would show the world that where the Sussexes go from here on out that they're *not* connected to the monarchy and the "Firm", this is it. They've stated it in big, bold letters that no funding is coming from the UK to support them or their endeavors. In a way, it kind of makes their ducal title seem less important in the grand scheme of things moving forward. At least in my eyes. I sincerely hope they do have a lot of good plans in the works on the back burner. They're going to need them.
Osipi
Yes, Osipi, I agree, they showed their hand too earlier in the game, I wonder if they still have a Joker
Ms. St-Laurent resigned her position as executive director but has not left the organization. So it does seem like things at Archewell are moving right along but again, its the Fail. Hopefully we'll get some information on some of their upcoming projects soon.
I'd say he knows by now what Meghan is like.. and doesn't want a ding dong battle.. the queen got out her reply about "recollections may vary".. which pretty much says that her recollections are not the same as M's...The Archbishop is probably being a good Christian and turning the other cheek rather than call our a professional victim on lying (intentionally or otherwise) in a TV interview. TBH its been made perfectly clear here in the UK media that such a "secret wedding" would be illegal so pretty clear it didn't happen and Meghan was at best confused, at worst lying.
I'm intrigued by how many staff they seem to have lost recently. I wonder if Ms. St-Laurent is being put on Archwell payroll to save them some money.
I am still puzzled as to why the Archbishop will not release a statement
Speaking of the Queen's grandchildren, doesn't she have legal custody of her grandchildren? I think I read that somewhere, but can anyone confirm whether or not that is true? If that is true, then Prince Charles will have legal custody of Archie when he becomes King.
It is possible that he asked the Supreme Governor of the Church if he should put out a clarifying statement and the answer is no. Just possible.
do you really think that they DIDNT want a big fancy wedding? Of course they did. They needed the big fancy wedding to make them known to the public esp in the US..A quiet small wedding with a few family and friends and no photos would not do that.