 |
|
12-16-2008, 08:29 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 817
|
|
Do we all wear latex gloves and use purell when we put a chicken or turkey in the oven? geez 
__________________
Everyone is born right-handed, only the gifted overcome it!!
|
12-16-2008, 08:49 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,912
|
|
__________________
|
12-16-2008, 09:31 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 2,155
|
|
Well let´s not exaggerate, the latex gloves alone should do it..... 
|
12-16-2008, 12:14 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,398
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crisscross1
Do we all wear latex gloves and use purell when we put a chicken or turkey in the oven? geez |
Well, I always wash my hands (whether with soap or purell ) when I cook! But I don't eat meat, so no specifically on the chicken/turkey....
I think using latex gloves or some kind of gloves is a good idea to pick up a carcus. But that's just me, obviously, others disagree. LOL and besides, I don't have experience picking up carcuses of any kind, so I am not knowledgable on it, but if I did, I would try to be as sanitary as I could....
|
12-16-2008, 12:38 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 2,155
|
|
|
As it was on the Sandringham Estate I should imagine that the RF make sure that all the birds are healthy.
|
12-16-2008, 04:01 PM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,912
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasiraghiTrio
I think using latex gloves or some kind of gloves is a good idea to pick up a carcus. But that's just me, obviously, others disagree. LOL and besides, I don't have experience picking up carcuses of any kind, so I am not knowledgable on it, but if I did, I would try to be as sanitary as I could....
|
I should think we all wash our hands before preparing a meal and although I am a vegetarian, I am able to prepare and cook meat. If you are at the side of a road and a rabbit or hare has had it's back broken after being run over, it would be cruel to just leave it suffering, because you haven't any rubber gloves. The same with game birds that have been shot but not killed. Kate only picked up the bird, she didn't snap it's neck, if you kill them or eat them you should be able to pick them up! 
|
12-16-2008, 05:11 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 2,155
|
|
|
Well HM showed us how you do that..... Actually I am more squeamish than I was when I was young girl, many a half shot animal was helped on its way by "moi". I just keep out of the way these days if possible and let other people be helpful.
My animal lover Aunt once stood in the middle of a busy highway giving first aid to a run over rabbit with her husband looking like a lunatic trying to slow the cars down so that she wouldn´t get hit. After a visit to the vet the rabbit lived quite some years and managed to become quite spoilt.
|
12-16-2008, 07:49 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,989
|
|
I am reasonably confident that Kate would have washed her hands as soon as she could after handling the dead bird, and before eating or handling food, so I don't think we have to worry about her.
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
|
12-16-2008, 11:03 PM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Near New York City, United States
Posts: 61
|
|
|
Not to worry, I would think. As long as the prize is consumed and not wasted, it will have been a good day!
|
12-16-2008, 11:17 PM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crisscross1
Do we all wear latex gloves and use purell when we put a chicken or turkey in the oven? geez |
Erm - yes...
Mind you, I've spent so many years editing microbiology books and papers, including a whole book about infectious diseases transmitted from poultry to humans, that I think I have an excuse. 
|
12-17-2008, 12:06 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,304
|
|
My mother-in-law was a lab technician before her marriage. She was very careful about germs as well. 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth
Erm - yes...
Mind you, I've spent so many years editing microbiology books and papers, including a whole book about infectious diseases transmitted from poultry to humans, that I think I have an excuse. |
|
12-19-2008, 08:15 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 1,987
|
|
|
|
12-19-2008, 11:57 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,398
|
|
Kate's makeup is pretty. William's beard is very good. It can be tricky to grow a good beard. I thought his father and grandfather looked good with their (very short lived, sailor era) beards too. God, Harry would look so hot with a beard too, all red and fuzzy. 
|
12-19-2008, 02:33 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 10,202
|
|
|
William looks great with that beard, I hope he keeps it!
|
12-19-2008, 03:20 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
|
I adore the beard on William he looks really good with it.
|
12-19-2008, 07:56 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ~, United States
Posts: 4,827
|
|
|
I am glad to see them out together. I seem to be in the minority, but I really don't care for the beard look on William. IMO, he looks much more handsome when he is clean-shaven.
|
12-20-2008, 01:30 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Camden, United States
Posts: 875
|
|
|
The beard is actually a good look for William, he should keep it as long as he can.
|
12-20-2008, 09:38 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: , Canada
Posts: 1,684
|
|
I think it's both funny and sad that the Daily Mail changed the story's headline to focus on glimps of Kate's bra: Royal wardrobe malfunction for Kate Middleton as the hairy one to the throne looks on | Mail Online. The headline was "Late Night Date for Kate Middleton and Her Prince (but what's with the beard)", which was focused on William's beard. The byline was "Daily Mail Reporter", which means anonymous. In another time, the writer (male or female) would be called lecherous.
|
12-20-2008, 09:52 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anywhere, United States
Posts: 952
|
|
|
I agree, Incas. It's sad that a photo like that is considered appropriate for publication by tabloids like the Mail.
__________________
"I have to be seen to be believed." HM The Queen
|
12-21-2008, 12:00 AM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,304
|
|
They are ruthless, aren't they?  I see lots of camisoles in Kate's future...or perhaps no more loose cowl-necks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella Kay
I agree, Incas. It's sad that a photo like that is considered appropriate for publication by tabloids like the Mail.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
