Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor News and Pictures 1: November 2003-May 2004


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
well I sure wish it would have been a better picture. Baby's head is tilted back, can't see her face well.
Edward and Sophie looking so lovingly...I suppose it's a 'sweet' picture, but just not a very revealing one.
To wait so long for a decent picture, then to see this...it's a letdown for me.
 
She looks lifeless in that pic. It would have been better if the baby's head wasn't titled back and she looked aware of what was going on. Babies that young can be photographed a lot better than this. And it would have been better if the parents were looking at the camera rather than grinning wildly at each other. I've seen some of Andrew's pictures, and he has done better.
 
did I read somewhere (can't remember...other message board I think), that there were 3 or 4 pictures that were being released? And only one of those was a 'freebie' the other had to be purchased.
Let's hope this was a freebie and the others are better then.

Geez I hate to get on an eyebrow soap box again...but WHAT is going on w/ Edwards eyebrows? Tame those caterpillars now...I see shades of the 'grumpy old aristocrat' with the runaway eyebrows in his future ;)
 
There is one 'free' picture going to the press and others which can be bought with proceeds going to charity.
 
Originally posted by kelly9480@Jan 9th, 2004 - 2:59 pm
She looks lifeless in that pic. It would have been better if the baby's head wasn't titled back and she looked aware of what was going on. Babies that young can be photographed a lot better than this. And it would have been better if the parents were looking at the camera rather than grinning wildly at each other.
I actually prefer that Edward and Sophie are grinning "wildly" at each other rather than looking directly at the camera. Part of the reason they said they chose Andrew is because it would be more relaxed to be photographed by someone so close to them. And quite obvious from their grins that it is sincere and not a 'forced' or 'for the cameras' grin.

Yes, maybe Louise's head could've been propped up a bit more so that we could see her more clearly, but she'll have the rest of her life to be photographed. This picture, albeit the first one since Louise left the hospital, is certainly not the last we'll see of her.
 
I dunno Alexandria, what you prefer..."grinning "wildly" at each other rather than looking directly at the camera" comes off as a bit smarmy and forced to me.

I can understand the choice of Andrew, but this really isn't the intimate family picture I was hoping for.

You are right, she has the rest of her lift to be photographed. But proud parents usually like a decent picture of their child for display.
 
This one's smaller, but clearer..
 

Attachments

  • baby2.jpg
    baby2.jpg
    12.4 KB · Views: 291
That picture is really cute !

they seem so happy :flower: µ

I saw a close up of Louise on the news.........really cute
 
The picture of Sophie and Louise is great, fergy! Louise looks so tiny, however ...
 
UK Telegraph

Louise, the little lady who gave everybody a big scare
By Caroline Davies
(Filed: 10/01/2004)

Buckingham Palace has released the first official photographs of Lady Louise Windsor showing that, despite her traumatic entry into the world, the two-month-old daughter of the Earl and Countess of Wessex is thriving.

Lady Louise, who was born prematurely by emergency caesarean, is still small for her age but is putting on weight, according to sources. And she was the focus of attention at Sandringham, where the photographs were taken by her uncle, the Duke of York, between Christmas and New Year.

The Countess too looks well. She is said to be fully recovered from the emergency operation performed to save her daughter's life, and has clearly lost most of the weight she put on during pregnancy.

The Earl and Countess are in the process of hiring a full-time nanny for Lady Louise, although the Countess intends to be a "hands on" mother.

"She has been spending as much quality time as possible with her daughter, and she is just thrilled at her progress," said one source. "She really is an absolutely adored baby - and a real cutie-pie. She looks like a perfect jolly little baby."

The Earl has also been getting "stuck in", devoting the past few weeks to spending time with her although it is unclear whether he has changed a nappy or not. He will resume his official programme of engagements next week.

Lady Louise Alice Elizabeth Mountbatten-Windsor, who is eighth in line to the throne but does not have the title HRH at her parents' request, is named after the Earl's paternal great great grandmother, Louise of Hesse (1817-1898).

She was born after the Countess, who had previously suffered an ectopic pregnancy, was rushed to Frimley Park Hospital in Surrey on Nov 8. Immediately after her birth, mother and daughter were separated when Lady Louise was taken to the specialist neo-natal unit at St George's Hospital in Tooting, south London.

The Queen, who was said to be "very upset" at the time, dotes on her seventh grandchild and spent plenty of time fussing over her during the Royal Family's annual break at Sandringham.

Unusually, she agreed to pose with the Wessexes and their daughter for an official photograph, taken by the Duke, which will be released tomorrow.

The Earl and Countess asked the Duke, a keen photographer, to take the informal pictures.

"It was their idea and he was delighted to do it," said an aide. "They felt it would look more natural and relaxed if the pictures were taken by a member of the family."

The Duke took more than 200 pictures in all. Seven are being released to the media and the rest distributed to members of the Royal Family, each signed "Edward, Sophie and baby Louise".

The Countess has said she thinks her daughter looks like the Earl. "She really sees him in her," said a source.

The father-daughter bond is obviously strong, demonstrated in one photograph where Lady Louise locks her gaze into the devoted Earl's eyes. In another, her tiny hand reaches out to grasp the Countess's finger.

The Countess is not expected to return to a full programme of engagements for some time. Although she has kept in touch with her charities, she has confined herself to paperwork rather than personal appearances.

The pictures are the third official Royal Family photographs taken by Prince Andrew since he bought his first camera in 1983. He took pictures of his mother, the Queen, to mark her 60th birthday, and a portrait for her Golden Jubilee.

He used a Canon EOS 1D digital camera to capture the informal images.
 
from hellomagazine

PRINCE ANDREW TAKES NEW PICS OF WESSEX BABY

When the Wessexes decided the time had come to take some new photos of their baby girl, they wanted to find a photographer they felt completely comfortable with. Step forward Prince Edward's older sibling Andrew, who has taken the first official snaps of baby Louise since her birth.

A keen amateur photographer, the Duke of York is said to be delighted the Earl and Countess asked him to help out. "Edward and Sophie decided Andrew was the best person for the job," revealed a source at the Palace. "As he is a member of the family it makes it all the more relaxed when the photographs are being taken."

The 43-year-old snapped a selection of photos during the Windsors' Christmas gathering at Sandringham. And some charming new pictures of the Wessexes, along with their new arrival and the rest of the Royal Family, are to be released by Buckingham Palace at the weekend.

They are the first snaps of little Louise since she was born prematurely on November 8. At first there were fears for the infant's health, but she has since put on several pounds and is said to be doing very well.
 
The rest have to be paid for, with proceeds going to their charity. Papers may purchase the pics and publish them, though.
 
from hellomagazine.com

NEW PICTURES OF LITTLE BABY LOUISE

12 JANUARY 2004
The delight is clearly visible on the faces of Prince Edward and Sophie Wessex, as they hold their baby in new photographs released by Buckingham Palace. The pictures, which were taken by the Duke of York, are the first official photos of little Louise since her birth two months ago.

Lady Louise gave the royal family quite a scare when she was born four weeks premature in November. At first there were fears for her health, but she has been putting on weight ever since and appears to be very healthy. And the Countess, who stayed in hospital for 10 days after the delivery, also looks well in the snaps.

"She is spending as much quality time as possible with her daughter, and she is just thrilled at her progress," said a source at the palace. "She really is an absolutely adored baby – and a real cutie-pie. She looks like a perfect jolly little baby."

Prince Andrew took the photographs over the Christmas break when the entire Windsor clan was gathered at Sandringham. A keen amateur photographer, he took 200 pictures in all, though only a handful are being released to the media. Most of the pics have been redistributed to members of the Royal Family, each signed "Edward, Sophie and baby Louise".
 
Edward with Louise
 

Attachments

  • 005.jpg
    005.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 533
Sophie with Louise
 

Attachments

  • 006.jpg
    006.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 488
with Queen Elizabeth
 

Attachments

  • 007.jpg
    007.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 485
Louise with her parents
 

Attachments

  • 008.jpg
    008.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 383
Originally posted by Martine@Jan 14th, 2004 - 8:23 am
Edward with Louise
I thought that I never would see "this photo" of Edward holding his own child. They married "late in life" ~ probably because of the examples of Edward's sibling's marriages, (plus it's not uncommon that women are having babies in their 30s and up to 42.) ~ her ectopic pregnancy, cutting the odds in half when they removed one of her fallopian tubes, plus the scare of Louise coming a little early. It just looks like Prince Edward is in love with his baby girl.

Gosh, I wish I subscribed to "HELLO" to see all the photos. I'm sure the Queen is over-the-moon (as the British say) about her new little granddaughter. :flower:
 
Terrific pictures, Martine! Thanks so much for sharing them here.

The last one of Edward, Sophie and Louise facing the cameras is terrifc. I am, however, not so crazy about the one with the Queen. She seems to be sitting quite apart/seperate from the young family, and it doesn't have the same cozy feeling that the recent pictures of the Dutch Queen with her son, daughter-in-law and grandddaughter evoked.
 
I absolutely love those pics! Lady Louise is a very cute baby and it's wonderful to see all those happy faces..

Yes, Alexandria, I feel the same way you do..It's a pity that the Queen comes across so reserved..it would have been nice to have her hold the baby as well..Perhaps there would have been more warmth there..
 
I guess that's not The Queen's style?!! The pictures are great though!!!
 
It is a pity there isn't more projected warmth, but I think the fact that the queen had visited them, and allowed the photo to be taken, shows that she does in fact adore this new granddaughter :)
 
I am so happy for the Wessexs' but I fear that the choice of title for Louise signals the death knell for the Royal Family for two reasons. Firstly, it won't stop press interest in her (just look at the coverage Zara Philips gets). Secondly, the whole point in having a Royal Family is that they are just that ...Royal! It seems that nowadays in the family everyone wants " a quiet life " but at the same time they fully expect Prince William to take on the mantle of full Royal duties. What would have happened if the parents of the present Kents and Gloucesters had taken the same view and stripped their children of their royal titles? Their support to the Queen over the past 50 years has been invaluable and I'm sure that she would be the first to admit that their tireless work has vastly contributed to the success of her reign. If William does not get the same help from his own cousins then I think the burden of Monarchy will be too much for him and one would not blame him if he decided to opt for "the quiet life" himself.
 
I agree with the wessex did. The press coverage will still be like her cousins, they might not follow her so much, because by the time she is in her teens, almost of her cousins will be married and the press will be too busy making up stories about them. Lousie is still a princess, when she turns of age she can decided to use the title or stay a lady. I guess her parents didnt give it to her so she wouldnt have the pressure of being a tennage princess. I think Soiphe spoke out a couple of years about the pressure of being young and royal, a lot of people said she was refuring to the york princesses. I dont think Louise's non HRH is the death of the RF, giving her the title would have been a death signal of the RF. The citizans have to pay for all these members of the RF with their money, I would guess a Brit would get mad sometimes. I know some do,I've been on some websits that are aganist the monarchy. And all they did was talk about taxes and prince Philp. I agree with you about the queens cousins helping plus her was her sister and mother. In the future there is only going to be William(and his wife), harry(with his wife) the york princesses and maybe Lousie, that is pretty small.
 
Well, the future royal family consisting of William, Harry and their spouses, Beatrice, Eugenie and their spouses, and maybe Louise may seem small now compared to the current huge size of the royal family, or rather the royals who undertake official engagements, but compared to the other royal houses of Europe, they will be average size. Yet don't forget that when William comes to the throne (and definitely when Charle succeeds), Princess Anne and Princes Andrew and Edward, the Countess of Wessex and maybe even the Gloucesters and Kents will probably still be there. Whether they will be working royals is another story.

The last poster said that when Louise is 18, she could choose to recieve her style and title, or rather be addressed as, HRH Princess Louise. Can she do this???
Technically, she was not stripped of her style and title because their was no act saying this. It is rather a common knowledge thing.

Lastly, the British people pay for The Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh to undertake their official engagements. They pay for them to due their duty, for example entertaing or travel. Yet they don't pay other working members of the royal family. The Queen gives allowences to Her children, excpet for Charles, and I believe she pays for Her cousins as well, so I don't think that the British people would have had that much of a problem with Louise being a princess.
 
I read on other MB's that Louise' s title will always be there and she can choose when she is of age. And in a interview(an old one) she said something about titles and their child having a choise about their role when they are older.To me it makes sence, but I figured that the court would say something about this. They kind of just left it. I dont think the spouces of princesses have any duties, only the wives of princes.
 
The main role of spouses of royal princesses is to accompany and support them on official engagements.
 
Baby Edward, Baby Louise
 

Attachments

  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 317
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom