Prince Leopold, Duke of Albany (1853-1884)


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Is this just me or does it seem that maybe Leo was a closet gay? I've read his biography and he just comes across that way. I know he married Helena but this marriage seems as a get out clause from getting away from his mother and living a life of his own, plus homosexuality was accepted in those days
 

The Duke of Albany is the great-grandfather of King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden through his mother, Princess Sybilla of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. The Duke of Connaught (Prince Leopold's brother and a former Governor-General of Canada) is, on the other hand, King Carl Gustaf's great-grandfather through his father, Prince Gustaf Adolf, Duke of Västerbotten.
 
Just read what may be the only bio on Prince Leopold, QV's youngest son. How dreadfully she treated her, mainly in ignoring the abuse by the infamous John Brown's brother, who she assigned to be PL's personal valet...the man was a mean-spirited drunk who would hit PL and abuse him in all ways, told the Queen he did not care for PL's little dog, so QV removed the dog, who was his greatest comfort, and also removed anyone Leopold seemed to love, due to her own sick jealousies. She had already decided he would be "hers" for life and did not want him to get ideas about any other lifestyle. pL fought his heart out, making himself ill,
All these years later, I am feeling so sad for Leopold...he tried so hard to make a life and when he finally did, he died with three years.
Sounds pretty unusual, even if the Browns were privileged servants that one of them would acutaly hit a royal prince. Or that if Leopold was so cruelly treated by his mother that he'd act as her secretary.

Is this just me or does it seem that maybe Leo was a closet gay? I've read his biography and he just comes across that way. I know he married Helena but this marriage seems as a get out clause from getting away from his mother and living a life of his own, plus homosexuality was accepted in those days

Do you mean Homosexuality wasn't accepted? Because it was illegal.
I certainly don't see how he came across as a closeted gay man.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Everything that I've read on Leopold, including biographies, state that he and his wife shared many interests and absolutely adored each other. Visitors spoke of the happiness of their home. I think Helen was exactly the right wife for Leopold, and, after all, he had searched around for a wife among various Continental princesses.

Leopold certainly had rather a love-hate relationship with his mother at times, but then so do some heterosexual men. He had artistic interests, yes, but so do some straight males. He had two children with Helen in their tragically brief marriage, which points more to the passion of most newlyweds in an age before efficient contraception than a gay trying to get away from Mama.
 
Last edited:
He was alos In love with Alice who was the inspriration for Alice in Wonderland as I recall. No I dont think he was gay at all. He and his wife did seem to have a happy short lived marriage and from what I've read (not much but a litlte) the Queen was delighted with the marriage and with Helene. I dont know of any evidence that she didn't care for Leo or that she treated him badly.
If she did not want him to go ot Oxford or "have fun" it was likely because like many mothers of haemophiliac children, she was worried and tried to protect him. And I cannot imagine that any servant at the time woudl have been guilty of the lese majeste of striking a royal child... (possibly a nanny might spank them).
 
Last edited:
Maybe it's because he was a man ahead of his time in his views and how he treats women. I thought that he got on well with Alice L and her sisters but it was more plantonic than romantic. I know that he loved Helen but it could also come across that he respected her and not in a romantic way. If he was gay and it was illegal, he'd want what was the 'normal' life.
There's no romantic notes to women or reports and Helen certainly seems to be the only woman he has been with and judging by the way his brothers cheated on their wives and conquests before they married proves it was t the way he was brought up
 
Was he? I thought that he was a "party political Conservative.

And I've never heard of Arthur being an unfaithful husband, he seems to have been quite devoted to Louise,
Besides the sons of Victoria WERE brought up to be "virtuous", thanks to Albert being such a puritan.
 
Princess Helena was one of the founders of the Deptford Fund to help the people living by the dockyards in the Deptford section of London, England.
 
Leopold was an appealing character who had friends in all areas of life, but everything I have ever read of his political views points to his being very politically conservative.

Jenny Churchill's sister Leonie, Lady Leslie, was a great friend to both Arthur Duke of Connaught and his wife Louise. She was a very gay (in the old sense of the word) and vivacious woman and there were rumours that she was something more than a confidante to Arthur. Whether that was so, I don't know.
 
Last edited:
Leopold was an appealing character who had friends in all areas of life, but everything I have ever read of his political views points to his being very politically conservative.

Jenny Churchill's sister Leonie, Lady Leslie, was a great friend to both Arthur Duke of Connaught and his wife Louise. She was a very gay (in the old sense of the word) and vivacious woman and there were rumours that she was something more than a confidante to Arthur. Whether that was so, I don't know.

I have read that about Leonie Leslie, I think that if she was a mistress she was the sort of woman who manages to be freinds with the wife as well.. Possibly she was Art's mistress but I gather that she was freinds wth A and Louise...
But Albert was such a strict puritan (Boring awful) man that its hardly surprising that at least 2 of his sons rebelled and were womanisers and party lovers...
I think that Leo may not have fooled around - but then he was in poor health, was very young when he died, poor man.
I gather that he was very much of a Conservative Sympathiser... but dot know much about his private life.
 
LL appears to have been Arts mistress just before his wife's death and after from what I read but it's not surprising they got close as she was Lou's friend.

I've read conflicting reports on where Leo stood politically. Some say he was Tory and others he was a socialist. He was probably somewhere in the grey.

I've read that Art did play around and that his mother stamped it out early as she didn't want him to turn out like his elder brothers but Leo had no connections with women other than friendships and admiration.
I'm just wondering if his homosexuality was covered up as he was the son of the monarch. Does anybody know if he had any close male friends apart from duckworth?
 
How on earth would the queen "stamp it out" if Arthur was playing around?? SHe couold not possilby do so.
I beleive that his marriage to Louise of Prussia was a good one and happy by royal standards, and it is possible that Leonie L was a good friend to both A and Louise, but perhaps she was more than a freind to him. however one discreet mistress whom his wife liked is hardly a wild career.. I suppose he had some pre marital relationships but very few Victorian men of the upper class didn't have soem.
As for Leo you seem to be taking it as a fact that he was homosexual, and IMO there's no evidence. If there had been, it would have almost certainly slipped out by now. Princess Louise's husband the Duke of Argyll was pretty certainly homosexual and there has been a fair bit of "heavy rumour" that has come out, and been mentioned in recent biographies, including the fact that their marriage wasn't a very happy one.
SO I'm sure if there was any real evidence on Leopold it wd have emerged by now. If he didn't have a wild sex life, odds are it was because of his ill health, taking up a lot of his energy.. and the fact that Victoria was a fussing and over protective mother to him...whiile he was in early manhood...
And he wasn't married long enough to have gotten out of hte "honeymoon phase"... where he might have turned ot other women...
 
I don't know why you say, LadyAlice, that Leopold had no connections with women 'apart from friendship and admiration'. We don't know the names of several of the mistresses of Victoria's sons. They're lost to history. Leopold may have had a mistress or two, he may not. It's not compulsory for monarch's sons to have mistresses anyway, and he certainly wouldn't have gone to bed with unmarried women of his own class.

According to biographer Charlotte Zeepvat around 1878 a brother or a friend made arrangements for Leopold to be introduced to the delights of sex. This was exactly how the future Edward VIII was initiated in WW1. Fellow officers facilitated it.

Leopold also spent time entertaining Crown Prince Rudolf of Austria in 1878 away from Windsor. Rudolf was already a womaniser and would become a roue. I don't think they would be spending their evenings in London reading until bedtime! He and friends often entertained actresses to supper at the Gaiety theatre in his bachelorhood. He wrote about the actress Phyllis Thornton that 'she is stouter, I think her figure is now perfect.'

However, Leopold did write to his friend and ex tutor, Robert Hawthorne Collins, about Edith Liddell's beauty, and that 'if she had been of higher rank I would myself take her to my --house. She is such a pretty bit of flesh.' (Edith died young)

So, all in all, I really don't get where this feeling is coming from that Leopold was homosexual! He wrote to his brother in law Louis of Hesse when he became engaged to Helen '...You only know Helen a little as yet --when you really know her' (the 'really' is underlined) 'then you will understand why I'm mad with joy today.'
 
Last edited:
If we dont know the names of some of the Mistresses of Vic's sons, how do we know they existed? Unless there was gossip that Prince X is having an affair wtih Mrs Y, (names suppressed)?
I imagine that Leo had a few pre marital affairs/flings but it might have been more diffcuclt for him than for the older sons as he was more under V's eye. She was fussing and protective, and due to his health problems he could not get away so much, for work purposes, unlike Bertie, Alfred and Arthur.

He might have been the sort of man who enjoyed a romantic friendship, with society ladies and wetn for sex to another type of woman, except for his wife.
but there simply isn't any evidence of his having any homosexual interests?
 
There was certainly always a lot of gossip zooming around London Society with regard to Bertie the Prince of Wales and his brother Affie (Alfred) and their sexual proclivities. When I say mistresses I include brief flings with minor actresses and others, the details not having come down to us. As in the future King George V sharing the delights of an unknown young woman with his brother AV at one stage.

I don't think Leopold was in any way as louche as his two oldest brothers, though there were rumours that he was having an affair in 1879 with the beautiful and ambitious Alma, Lady Breadelbane. (He was apparently deeply in love with her.)

However, in the accepted Victorian way Leopold may have slept, while he was a bachelor, with a few actresses, Gaiety Girls, dancers, who were considered fair game I suppose by the upper classes.

I don't think Leopold and his friends were holding regular little supper parties with actresses in order to talk politics and philosophy. In other words, from all I've read, I don't believe Leopold was a virgin when he married Helen, nor do I think he'd had sex with men nor fancied males. Nor do I believe he was unfaithful to his wife with women or men during his brief marriage. Leopold and Helen were by all accounts extremely happy together.
 
Last edited:
T

I don't think Leopold was in any way as louche as his two oldest brothers, though there were rumours that he was having an affair in 1879 with the beautiful and ambitious Alma, Lady Breadelbane. (He was apparently deeply in love with her.)

However, in the accepted Victorian way Leopold may have slept, while he was a bachelor, with a few actresses, Gaiety Girls, dancers, who were considered fair game I suppose by the upper classes.er.
I hope he did more than sleep with them!!:)
of course actresses, Gaiety girls, and lower class girls who were up for it, were indeed considered fair game for men who could pay or charm them into bed.. Middle class women were generally off bounds and upper class women were not fair game unless they were safely married. (which for some reason a lot of modern people dont seem to "get".)
I agree that its safe that Leo wasn't as big a womaniser as his 2 older brothers but he problaby had his affairs prior to marraige, just not that many.
And he was only a few years married, and was in love with his wife, so odds are that he was faithful to her....
 
I'm pretty sure the throne he renounced his (and his heirs) right to was Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, not The United Kingdom. Didn't all the German sovereigns do the same thing?

Well, I checked the Titles Deprivation Act and it does look like he did lose all his British titles plus his HRH. But he did not lose his place in the Order of Succession.

The German Empire was actually a federation of monarchies (kingdoms, grand duchies, duchies, principalities, etc.) presided by the King of Prussia, who also held the title of German Emperor. When the Empire was created, the constituent monarchies continued to exist, but ceded part of their sovereignty (e.g. control over monetary policy, trade, the armed forces, international relations, etc.) to the imperial government.

When the German Empire fell in 1918 , all existing kings, grand dukes, dukes and sovereign princes in the constituent member states within the empire also lost their respective thrones.
 
Last edited:
What on earht do you mean he had a child as well as a Nazi Monster?

I think what is meant is that he had two children, which he did.

How much of a 'monster' his son was is a matter of degree. That he joined the Nazi party is without doubt but so did many other Germans who then didn't do any of the horrific things at all.
 
Charles Edward was 'dispossessed' in 1919, along with other German rulers and Heads of Royal and aristocratic Houses due to uprisings by soviets. Titles, lands and a way of life gone. A lot of these royals and aristos were so one-eyed about the dangers of Communism that they couldn't see the dangers that Nazism represented. Some even believed (forlorn hope) that Adolf would facilitate the return of the monarchy.

However, it is a matter of degree. Charles Edward may not have committed terrible deeds himself, but he was certainly a prominent member of the Nazi Party, who allowed himself to be used for prestige and propaganda purposes. I don't believe he was half as influential in BRF circles as the Nazi leadership believed him to be. Nevertheless, he was certainly rather an embarrassment, to say the least, to Kings George V and VI.
 
I think that "Nazi monster" is a bit OTT. He did join the Nazi Party, and so did other German royals and aristocrats. Some changed hteir minds, others did it because it was patriotic, or because it was common to join it.
Charles Edw was I think involved a bit in the awful programme to euthanize or sterilise handicapped people, so he wasn't just someone who joined because it was expected. OTOH, other people at the time believed in sterilising the mentally ill.. and weren't Nazis.. So I wouldn't say he was a monster but he wasn't someone who innocently joined the party and just expected some social kudos...
 
Several posts have been removed.

Please remember that opinions and theories are to be backed up with facts and reliable sources - if someone asks for a source on one of your comments, it is up to you to provide it.

As always, questions to be directed to the moderating team.
 
Last edited:
I apologise if my personal opinions offended anyone
 
I think what is meant is that he had two children, which he did.

How much of a 'monster' his son was is a matter of degree. That he joined the Nazi party is without doubt but so did many other Germans who then didn't do any of the horrific things at all.
I'm puzzled as to how Leopold was responsible for his son's life choices? Charles Edward was born after Leopold's death. Charles Edward became a Nazi party member of his own will and he was an adult.
 
I'm puzzled as to how Leopold was responsible for his son's life choices? Charles Edward was born after Leopold's death. Charles Edward became a Nazi party member of his own will and he was an adult.

No of course he wasn't responsible for C Edward.. But I think that LadyAlice (Forgive me if I m wrong) felt that CE suppressed info about Leopolds sexuality... Im not sure why his being a Nazi would mean that he did this....

I apologise if my personal opinions offended anyone

I am not offended, personally. It is nothing to me, if Leopold was gay.. but I think that opinions should be based on facts...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When Leo died did any of his brothers apart from Bertie played a part in his funeral? I know that affie went to Alice's in Darmstadt
 
Below is a report of the funeral and the attendees, which included the Queen, British-based Royal princesses and the Prince of Wales.

15 May 1884 - FUNERAL OF THE DUKE OF ALBANY. - Trove

From this it appears that Bertie was the only brother present. Affie wasn't, and Arthur wasn't. As the latter almost certainly would not have absented himself if he'd been stationed in Britain my guess is that he was serving abroad, probably in India, and couldn't have got back in time. Don't know what Affie's excuse was, especially as Louis Battenberg (also a senior naval officer) and Prince Philip of Saxe Coburg Gotha were present.

Arthur had been on active service in Egypt against Arabi's forces a couple of years before, in 1882, and there is a chance that he was also still there at the time of Leopold's death, but IMHO it's more likely he was on the Indian sub-continent.

He went on to serve as Chief of the Bombay Armies only a few years later and he wouldn't have been given that command without extensive service in the armies of the Bombay Presidency, as it was known, first, so my guess is that Arthur was there when he got the news about Leopold. He would have been very upset as the two were close in boyhood.
 
Last edited:
So I watched a documentary on Victoria and hemophilia, has anyone heard about Leopold stabbing himself in the top of his mouth with a pen?
 
It's possible if he was writing and stopped for a moment to check something, that he might have popped his pen in his mouth and by swinging his chair inadvertently jabbed the flesh on the top of his mouth. If it cut the skin then it would have bled copiously of course.

I have a bio of Leopold but I can't recall this incident being mentioned. However there were so many times in Leopold's life when slight accidents that wouldn't have affected a person who didn't have his condition at all, but laid him low for weeks.
 
Back
Top Bottom