 |
|
08-14-2005, 10:42 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: my paradise, United States
Posts: 2,084
|
|
|
Can people who become king change their name still? like how the Pope does.
__________________
__________________
"The pain of spending a week with my brother is well worth it."
– Prince William, on joining Prince Harry for a charity motorcycle ride across South Africa
|
08-14-2005, 10:44 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 285
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Harry's polo shirt
Can people who become king change their name still? like how the Pope does.
|
I think they can, Edward VIII was christened Albert, or Bertie.
__________________
|
08-14-2005, 11:20 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 537
|
|
|
George VI was Albert (nicknamed Bertie) Edward VIII I think was his first name was Edward but he went by his last name David.
|
08-14-2005, 11:57 PM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
|
|
|
Edward VIII's name was Edward Albert Christian George Andrew Patrick David (the last four names are the names of the patron saints of England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales).
Interesting how many more names he had than Prince John, his youngest brother.
|
08-15-2005, 01:08 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Near NY City, United States
Posts: 1,824
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Oppie
George VI was Albert (nicknamed Bertie) Edward VIII I think was his first name was Edward but he went by his last name David.
|
King George VI's full name was Albert Frederick Arthur George.
|
08-15-2005, 01:27 AM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
|
|
|
The three middle sons had four names each, but poor Prince John only had three. I suppose it was a way of letting people know that he was less important in the grand scheme of things or something.
|
08-15-2005, 08:27 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,548
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elspeth
The three middle sons had four names each, but poor Prince John only had three. I suppose it was a way of letting people know that he was less important in the grand scheme of things or something.
|
Maybe they just ran out of ideas?
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
|
08-15-2005, 11:10 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: my paradise, United States
Posts: 2,084
|
|
|
My older sister has three middle names and I have one.:(
__________________
"The pain of spending a week with my brother is well worth it."
– Prince William, on joining Prince Harry for a charity motorcycle ride across South Africa
|
08-15-2005, 02:47 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ., Italy
Posts: 618
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elspeth
The three middle sons had four names each, but poor Prince John only had three. I suppose it was a way of letting people know that he was less important in the grand scheme of things or something.
|
The Queen has three names, but her sister had only two.
I think that all the Queen's children have fourn names.
(And poor Philip has only one. I wonder if he's the only royal with one name).
__________________
I declare before you all that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family to which we all belong.
HRH Princess Elizabeth, Cape Town, 21st April 1947
|
08-16-2005, 01:48 AM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Near NY City, United States
Posts: 1,824
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ElisaR
The Queen has three names, but her sister had only two.
I think that all the Queen's children have fourn names.
(And poor Philip has only one. I wonder if he's the only royal with one name).
|
Beatrice and Eugenie also only have three names. They are Beatrice Elizabeth Mary and Eugenie Victoria Helena.
|
01-03-2006, 05:08 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: jonesboro, United States
Posts: 183
|
|
|
does anyone have any pictures of prince john?
|
01-03-2006, 07:13 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Irvine, United States
Posts: 1,683
|
|
|
"In 1917 he was sent, with a nanny and male attendants, to Wood Farm on the Sandringham estate, and did not ever see his parents again."
If this is true, I think that is very sad. His parents could have visited him even if he was in isolation. Even his brothers could have. This whole story is just very sad indeed.:(
|
01-03-2006, 07:14 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,051
|
|
|
I dont think that is true. I thought Mary saw John and visited him.
|
01-03-2006, 07:19 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Irvine, United States
Posts: 1,683
|
|
|
I actually really don't know. I was just browsing through this thread and on the first page there was an excerpt that said this. I certainly hope that's not true.
|
01-03-2006, 07:24 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 12,867
|
|
|
The story of Prince John's illness and isolation touched me. At the time, so little was known about epilsey (sp). I was speaking with a friend a week ago about his nephew (who is bi polar) and I was just commenting on what would happened to him if he was born years ago. The medical advances of certain conditions/diseases are such a blessing.
|
01-04-2006, 12:18 AM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lamass
does anyone have any pictures of Prince John?
|
See post #23
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|
03-09-2007, 08:09 AM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: lichfield, United Kingdom
Posts: 38
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by emily62_1
Edward VIII was known as David by relatives and friends. The Princess Royal was Mary, born in 1897 , later Duchess of Fife.
|
Princess Mary, unless I am mistaken, became Countess of Harewood, not Duchess of Fife.
|
03-09-2007, 08:14 AM
|
|
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cath
Princess Mary, unless I am mistaken, became Countess of Harewood, not Duchess of Fife.
|
Yes, Louise, Princess Royal, eldest daughter of Edward VII, became the 1st Duchess of Fife.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|
03-09-2007, 08:17 AM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: lichfield, United Kingdom
Posts: 38
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cath
Princess Mary, unless I am mistaken, became Countess of Harewood, not Duchess of Fife.
|
Sorry - realised after I posted that someone else had already made this point earlier in the thread.
|
03-11-2007, 12:17 AM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
|
|
I've split out the posts which were about the TV miniseries "The Lost Prince" and moved them to the Library as a separate thread, which can be found here.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
