 |
|

02-19-2013, 06:46 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 14,035
|
|
Mumps doesn't always cause sterility if contracted in or after puberty - if it did them every boy in my brother's year at boarding school would have failed to father any children as they all came down with the mumps in Third Form, as it was then called - now Year 9 - so 14 - 16 years old. Everyone of them has at least two children.
|

02-19-2013, 07:18 PM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,112
|
|
As per Wikipedia, "in teenage males and men, complications such as infertility or subfertiliy are more common, although still rare in absolute terms." Doesn't always cause it and doesn't usually cause it, but can. Both David and Bertie seem to have contracted mumps around the same time (I believe in 1911-ish). As one had a reputation for being a playboy but has no known children - legitimate or otherwise - and the other was not a playboy but had 2 children, the implication is that mumps may have cause infertility in David but not Bertie.
|

02-21-2013, 03:37 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 351
|
|
It is the onset of orchitis (inflamation of the testicles) which can accompany mumps, which can lead to sterility.
|

03-08-2013, 02:40 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
Never Seen This Picture Before:
The Duchess of Windsor, Lord Louis Mountbatten and HRH The Duke of Kent laying flowers at the Duke of Windsor’s grave at the Royal Burial Ground at Frogmore in 1973:
http://kingedwardviii.tumblr.com/image/44757745778
.
|

03-08-2013, 05:42 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
|
|
It's been seen many times before and was the last time The Duchess visited the UK. She met with The Queen afterwards for tea and then returned to Paris that afternoon. The Queen never saw or spoke with her again.
|

04-12-2013, 04:02 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,861
|
|
This evening, PBS in Chicago aired Extraordinary Women: Wallis Simpson.
It stated that her 1st husband Win Spencer repeatedly physically abused Wallis that he caused internal bleeding.
Wallis might had become infertile because of the physical abuse.
While in the Bahamas, Wallis helped local children because she and Edward never had kids.
It showed another side of the story.
.
|

05-23-2013, 11:05 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

05-23-2013, 06:38 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 14,035
|
|
I am rather surprised to here that this was supposedly kept secret for so long as I have known that for yonks.
What hasn't been made known is what was heard - that would be interesting.
|

05-23-2013, 07:38 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,034
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie
I am rather surprised to here that this was supposedly kept secret for so long as I have known that for yonks.
What hasn't been made known is what was heard - that would be interesting.
|
Oh yes, I'd queue in line for that revelation!
|

09-03-2013, 07:14 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
It's interesting seeing that the late King/Duke's great-nephew has managed to do something that he himself wasn't able to do in the 30's.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

09-03-2013, 07:34 PM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,112
|
|
Things change in 70 years.
|

09-03-2013, 10:06 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hilo, Malibu, United States
Posts: 1,353
|
|
Except Camilla isn't American.
|

09-03-2013, 10:23 PM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,112
|
|
And Wallis being an American wasn't the problem.
|

09-03-2013, 10:39 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
Yeah, I just think the Windsor's help pave the way for Charles & Camilla.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

09-03-2013, 11:33 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 3,010
|
|
I am no great fan of the Duke of Windsor, but he was as much an HRH, as the new king. If you believe in that stuff, he as born to it, hardly can remove it by a piece of paper. And since they "allowed him to keep the title, they spitefully denied his wife of her rightful title. HRH. Not that it means a hill of beans. Just the DOC is an HRH, she is no different than Wallis. Of course, today it was possible. Take a 2 step here and there and you have the "Best Little Whore House in Texas".
|

09-04-2013, 12:19 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,276
|
|
OH Good grief, the world has changed a lot since 1936. A twice divorced woman with 2 living ex husbands was not acceptable for a Queen. 2 living husbands might still pose a problem today. Still in 1936 a divorced man could not become President of the US and I doubt he could have a much married and divorced First Lady either. When Betty Ford became FLOTUS in 1974 her status as a previously divorced woman was much written about. It wasnt until 1980 that a divorced man was elected POTUS. Now of course there are presidential candidates who have been married and divorced multiple times and it does not seem to bother too many people. Times change, most people are able to adapt and move on.
|

09-04-2013, 03:05 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 10,297
|
|
 Hmm, so the US was just as "bigoted", "mean" and "spiteful" as the UK. Good to know and great for a balanced look at history "in it's time and place" instead of the sniping involved in equating the DoW situation to that of the DoC 70 years after the fact!
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

09-04-2013, 03:12 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 14,035
|
|
I bet a lot of the people who make that comparison would be horrified if the attitudes to divorced people in ordinary society still existed today - e.g. one or other party had to be labelled as 'at fault', they wouldn't be accepted in many homes or even jobs or clubs/associations.
Times have moved on but for some people they haven't - or is it more that it is Charles that has had this chance and not so much that he is the heir to the throne? Would they be so critical if William had wanted to marry a divorced woman?
|

09-04-2013, 05:42 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 351
|
|
In 1983, my then husband and I decided to round off our weekend in that area by travelling home via Fort Belvedere, not knowing that it was totally concealed by woodland!!! I explained my bitter disappointment to a friend who I knew to have spent time there. She said that she thought it a singularly unattractive building and when I said that I would have loved to see what the inside was like she replied "My dear, you would HATE it. It is full of THAT woman"!!!!!!!................and that was nearly 50 years on since "that woman" had been there.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|