 |
|

12-28-2012, 07:32 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,806
|
|
That is really a precious photo. They certainly learn protocol at an early age!
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
|

12-28-2012, 08:35 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: My own head, United States
Posts: 8,101
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereditaryPrincess
|
How precious  . I love Eugenie's dress.
__________________
"My guiding principles in life are to be honest, genuine, thoughtful and caring".
~Prince William~
I'm not obsessed with royalty...I just think intensely about it.
|

12-29-2012, 12:20 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 724
|
|
I've seen this picture before, but didn't realize it was Eugenie!
|

12-29-2012, 08:42 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 13,871
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarahedwards2
I've seen this picture before, but didn't realize it was Eugenie!
|
Yes, I found the picture on a royal blog and the caption underneath read 'A young Princess Eugenie curtseying to the Queen Mother'- or something similar.
__________________
"For beautiful eyes, look for the good in others; for beautiful lips, speak only words of kindness; and for poise, walk with the knowledge that you are never alone". Audrey Hepburn
*
"Think of all the beauty still left around you and be happy". Anne Frank
|

12-30-2012, 02:26 PM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|

Yes, it's Eugenie and it was taken in 1997 at the same time as these two:
v Viscountess Linley giving a low curtsey to the Queen Mother during the Royal Family's annual cruise around Scotland,
followed immediately by...
> Lady Sarah Chatto (going even lower).
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

12-30-2012, 02:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 13,871
|
|
Thanks for the pictures of Viscountess Linley and Lady Sarah, Warren!
|

12-30-2012, 07:43 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,806
|
|
I see it's a matter of choice when making these curtseys to bow your head, as Sophie did, or look directly at the person.
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
|

12-30-2012, 08:20 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: My own head, United States
Posts: 8,101
|
|
The three ladies' curtseys are very elegant, graceful, and full of reverence. Thank you to those who provided the photos.
__________________
"My guiding principles in life are to be honest, genuine, thoughtful and caring".
~Prince William~
I'm not obsessed with royalty...I just think intensely about it.
|

12-30-2012, 08:47 PM
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Washington DC, United States
Posts: 74
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baroness of Books
I see it's a matter of choice when making these curtseys to bow your head, as Sophie did, or look directly at the person.
|
I once read that back in the '50s and '60s the rumour was that the Duke of Edinburgh would smile at you when you curtseyed if he found you unattractive. So many of the ladies started to bow their heads because they didn't want to see if he smiled at them.
|

01-02-2013, 05:40 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arad, Romania
Posts: 276
|
|
.
At about minute 1 you can see Harry and William bowing to Queen Anne-Marie when receiving a polo award from her:
|

01-02-2013, 05:51 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,185
|
|
Why would William and Harry bow to Anne-Marie?
|

01-02-2013, 05:56 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|
Because Anne Marie is a Queen (even if former), whereas Harry and William are just Princes. Or, in other words, protocol, respect.
For the same reason, Kate curtseys to Crown Princess Margarita of Romania, Queen Anne Marie, and other royal ladies from former monarchies.
Current monarchies tend to be much more uptight when it comes to former royal houses; as far as they are concerned, once a King - always a King. You might have noticed how in the official portrait taken before the Lunch for Monarchs, former Sovereigns (Michael of Romania, Simeon of Bulgaria...) were given great prominence - greater, in fact, than reigning ones for they were seated immediately next to the Queen. That's because as far as Royal Families are concerned, Michael and Simeon have been Kings since 1927 (1940) and 1943 respectively, and the fact their countries are no longer monarchies is somewhat irrelevant.
|

01-02-2013, 06:02 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,185
|
|
Once a King always a King? What exactly are Michael and Simeon King of? Not Romania or Bulgaria thats for sure.
|

01-02-2013, 06:07 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|
As far as monarchies are concerned, they are. Have you noticed that the former Monarchs are addressed by their full titles and styles by virtually all current monarchies, and most other countries too? It's like being a marine; there is no such thing as "ex". Now, Crown Princess Margarita will never be Queen Margarita (unless monarchy in Romania is reinstated) because she didn't hold the title at the time monarchy in the country was abolished. Her father though will remain a King for the rest of his life.
|

01-02-2013, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,034
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia
As far as monarchies are concerned, they are. Have you noticed that the former Monarchs are addressed by their full titles and styles by virtually all current monarchies, and most other countries too? It's like being a marine; there is no such thing as "ex". Now, Crown Princess Margarita will never be Queen Margarita (unless monarchy in Romania is reinstated) because she didn't hold the title at the time monarchy in the country was abolished. Her father though will remain a King for the rest of his life.
|
I think the DOE was asking about real life. When the country you rule decides not to be ruled, no matter how illegal, unfair, usurper-ous, whatever - you no longer rule a country. There is some other legal platform that rules the country.
I do applaud fellow royals/ex-royals when they stand for monarchies that have been illegally, if factually, overthrown. But that does not necessarily incite the locals to take up arms and reinstate the monarchy.
|

01-02-2013, 07:43 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
Yeah, the royals make sure they give respect to all the Monarchs, even if they are former Kings and Queens.
If I met Queen Anne Marie, I would bow my head too.
|

01-02-2013, 07:53 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,276
|
|
Well Americans still accord Jimmy Carter, George HW Bush, Bill Clinton and George W Bush the title of President even though they no longer hold office so there isn't much difference.
|

01-02-2013, 08:05 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmirerUS
I think the DOE was asking about real life. When the country you rule decides not to be ruled, no matter how illegal, unfair, usurper-ous, whatever - you no longer rule a country. There is some other legal platform that rules the country.
I do applaud fellow royals/ex-royals when they stand for monarchies that have been illegally, if factually, overthrown. But that does not necessarily incite the locals to take up arms and reinstate the monarchy.
|
I understand and fully agree with that; the people of Greece no longer recognise Constantine and Anne Marie as their King and Queen, so they are not legally monarchs of anything. I was explaining the situation from the point of view of monarchies as I understand it.
|

01-02-2013, 08:16 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 4,138
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NGalitzine
Well Americans still accord Jimmy Carter, George HW Bush, Bill Clinton and George W Bush the title of President even though they no longer hold office so there isn't much difference.
|
This habit has always amused me. Australians continue to accord our former Prime Ministers the same level of contempt accorded to them while they were in office. They're lucky to just get referred to as "Howard" or "Hawke" or "Keating" without some expletive in front of it. At best it's Mr, and that's only formally.
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 42 (0 members and 42 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|