 |
|
11-11-2018, 05:56 PM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bandung, Indonesia
Posts: 115
|
|
And no curtsey from Mrs May to the Duchess of Sussex  (1:23)
https://youtu.be/qsS8NXKbFUY
|
11-11-2018, 06:46 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NYC, United States
Posts: 767
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darnius
|
She did to William but not to Kate. What's your point?
__________________
|
11-11-2018, 07:12 PM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bandung, Indonesia
Posts: 115
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuliannaVictoria
She did to William but not to Kate. What's your point?
|
No point at all. I didn’t know she did it to Kate either.
|
11-12-2018, 03:44 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,372
|
|
|
She nodded her head, just like the female church-official did. So nothing wrong done.
|
11-12-2018, 04:52 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 12,694
|
|
|
You don't curtsey to every single royal down the line. If you choose to curtsey - and it is optional even for the Prime Minister - the norm is to curtsey to the royal born and not their partner, especially when they are together.
There is no requirement to curtsey to anyone, including the Queen.
|
12-08-2018, 04:58 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 4,692
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie
You don't curtsey to every single royal down the line. If you choose to curtsey - and it is optional even for the Prime Minister - the norm is to curtsey to the royal born and not their partner, especially when they are together.
There is no requirement to curtsey to anyone, including the Queen.
|
I didn't know this rule about curtsey only to the royal born and not to the partner. But I noticed that Mrs May did not curtsey to Kate nor to Meghan but she did curtsey to Camilla, so I'm a bit lost.
|
12-08-2018, 05:18 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 5,773
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie
You don't curtsey to every single royal down the line. If you choose to curtsey - and it is optional even for the Prime Minister - the norm is to curtsey to the royal born and not their partner, especially when they are together.
.
|
I am not familiar with that norm. In countries where curtsying is still observed, people tend to curtsy both to the Royal by birth and his consort, who holds the same rank and style.
Personally, I would bow to anyone with the style of Majesty or Royal Highness, either by birth or by marriage.
|
12-18-2018, 12:15 PM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bandung, Indonesia
Posts: 115
|
|
|
|
12-18-2018, 12:49 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,830
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darnius
|
Video:
A very nice curtsy to The Duchess of Sussex-
https://mobile.twitter.com/emynash/s...83346202206209
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|
12-25-2018, 10:20 AM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bandung, Indonesia
Posts: 115
|
|
|
|
12-25-2018, 10:35 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,025
|
|
 So by this it appears the Sussexes and Cambridges are neither at Sandringham, is that right?
__________________
"And the tabloid press will be a pain in the ass, as usual." - Royal Norway
|
12-25-2018, 10:37 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,933
|
|
|
I honestly believe that would be reading too much into it - last year they curtsied and this year they did the same. I doubt they wouldn't have gone back for lunch at Sandringham anyway?
|
12-25-2018, 10:43 AM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,025
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy100
I honestly believe that would be reading too much into it - last year they curtsied and this year they did the same. I doubt they wouldn't have gone back for lunch at Sandringham anyway?
|
So that other explanation is that they are doing it just for the cameras? Because no one (excepting Jack and Tim) behind them bows?
__________________
"And the tabloid press will be a pain in the ass, as usual." - Royal Norway
|
12-25-2018, 11:03 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 11,906
|
|
|
Not everyone curtesy's or bows the head...because they have already seen The Queen earlier today.
LaRae
|
12-25-2018, 11:07 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 5,773
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darnius
|
Meghan is still bowing as she curtsies.
|
12-25-2018, 11:08 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Picture of the Week Coordinator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 5,496
|
|
|
But they just saw the Queen in church, so I’m confused about this idea that they’re bowling/curtesying because they’ve just seen her. Wouldn’t they do it when she entered, or left the church?
|
12-25-2018, 11:09 AM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 11,906
|
|
|
They don't curtesy at the services...they are all in the Church usually well before the Queen arrives...IIRC no one is supposed to arrive after the Queen.
Every year they line up outside (whoever hasn't seen her) and as she leaves curtesy/bow.
LaRae
|
12-25-2018, 11:16 AM
|
|
Super Moderator
Picture of the Week Coordinator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 5,496
|
|
|
Yeah, I know that no one arrives after the Queen. I was wondering if they would curtsey to her inside the church.
In any event, seeing as Tim and Jack bowed as she left, I’m not convinced it tells us who has, or hasn’t seen her.
|
12-25-2018, 11:19 AM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,558
|
|
|
Enough with all the criticism of who bows, how and when. I just noticed that Jack Brooksbank — a first timer at Sandrjnghan Christmas— also bowed. Eugenie didn’t.
I’m going to assume it’s over compensation and leave it at that.
Meghan and Jack aren’t idiots —- just new to everything and not wanting to put a wrong foot forward.
Goos for them!
__________________
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
