The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #401  
Old 08-30-2017, 10:23 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,958
I think, technically, that everyone who isn't born into the BRF is considered a commoner. I agree that the Spencers are an old and very prominent aristocratic family but they weren't once Kings. More Northamptonshire sheep farmers! Like most quite old aristo families they have royal blood in the family from Charles II (who sired quite a lot of illegitimate children) and on the distaff side I believe James II, but that blood came from advantageous marriages as the Spencers went up in the world and made their mark in national life.
Reply With Quote
  #402  
Old 08-30-2017, 10:45 PM
MaiaMia_53's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,918


Read the history of the Spencer family that I linked above. Winston Churchill is a related member of the Spencer clan as well.

Also @Denville's reference to Fergie being from 'landed gentry.' So what? So is Camilla from the 'landed gentry' class, which is below the aristocracy/nobility.

And yes, the Spencers are aristocrats who are related to royalty via illegitimate ancestors:
"Today's Spencers are direct descendants, albeit illegitimate, of the House of Stuart, with the family boasting at least five lines of direct descent from the Stuarts; and from them, the Spencers can trace their ancestry to other royal houses such as the Bourbons, the Medicis, the Wittelsbachs, the Hanovers, the Sforzas, the Habsburgs, and the Houses of Howard and Boleyn through Mary Boleyn, Mistress of Henry VIII of England."

Also the term 'commoner' in the U.K. refers to "a person who is not born into a position of high social rank." That absolutely does not describe Diana or her family! She was not born of royalty, but she was a member of the aristocracy/nobility. The ancestors who began as sheep farmers is not recent. It's very far back. Still, there's nothing wrong with sheep farmers, but Diana did not grow up the daughter of a sheep farmer! Another famous ancestor of Diana's was Lady Georgiana Spencer who married the Duke of Devonshire (another famous British aristocratic family).

Interestingly the Spencers were also related to George Washington's family.
Reply With Quote
  #403  
Old 08-31-2017, 03:11 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,958
It's a little more complex than that, though of course only in the technical sense. Both Lady Elizabeth Bowes Lyon and Diana were commoners before they married as they weren't peers just held courtesy titles.

Is it possible for a royal to be a commoner? – Royal Central

I meant by my comment that the direct Spencer line did not, at the beginning, contain Kings or Queens. In early Tudor times they were simple Northamptonshire farmers, sheep farmers. Of course, as they became more prosperous and more grand they did aquire ancestors who had royal blood via brides from the gentry and aristocracy who MARRIED into the Spencer line. The Spencers didn't have it inherently, from the family's earliest beginnings. And the Royal blood was through illegitimacy though the progeny certainly had all the lineage you mentioned.
Reply With Quote
  #404  
Old 08-31-2017, 08:48 AM
Jacknch's Avatar
Former Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Suffolk, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,228
Let's get back on topic please - the thread is about true love marriages and not a debate on who is or is not a "commoner".
__________________
JACK
Reply With Quote
  #405  
Old 08-31-2017, 08:59 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 11,338
Definitely all morganatic marriages were of true love.
Reply With Quote
  #406  
Old 01-08-2018, 03:37 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 9,822
Queen Victoria of Great Britain and Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
Prince Joachim and Princess Marie of Denmark
Prince Felix and Princess Claire of Luxembourg
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
royal, true love


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Royal Marriages Act of 1772 and Royal Marriages branchg British Royals 118 09-17-2022 09:31 PM
Is it true love??? nilah King Felipe VI, Queen Letizia and Family 93 01-20-2005 12:45 AM




Popular Tags
abdullah ii africa albert prince consort all tags america arcadie arcadie claret austria braganza british royal family brythonic assoc. non-reigning houses +- camilla caribbean caroline charles iii claret congo current events danish royal family death de la cerda denmark duarte pio duchess of kent duke of cambridge emperor naruhito empress masako garsenda genealogy grace kelly grimaldi history identifying india introduction ivrea king charles king henry iii king philippe king willem-alexander leopold ier louis mountbatten maria ii matrilineal monaco monarchy official visit order of precedence orleans-braganza pedro ii portugal prince albert monaco prince andrew prince charles princess of orange queen camilla queen elizabeth queen ena of spain queen margrethe ii queen mathilde queen maxima republics restoration spain spanish royal family state visit switzerland uae visit wine glass


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2022
Jelsoft Enterprises