The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 02-18-2016, 04:54 PM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 12,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marengo View Post
The silence from Grand Duke Jean and other relatives about the matter does not need to mean anything at all. Most people don't like to show the public their dirty laundry.

JC supposedly sided with Henri and MT and persuaded her husband to accept the marriage. She was perhaps reminded of her own marriage, which was one of the last royal marriages that was forced upon the couple by their parents. Both were in love with somebody else at the time.

It was her own mother-in-law, Grand Duchess Charlotte, who was against it. Somehow people seem to mix this story with that of JC. The old Grand Duchess was so upset about the matter that the press was asked not to make pictures of her during the wedding. She turned around after the birth of Guillaume.

JC was in terrible pains from surgeries, chemo therapies etc. since the early nineties. On top of that, her stroke made her personality more difficult too, as happens sometimes. She was difficult towards all her children (in-law). It was Marie-Astrid -with a very Imperial husband- who received most of the blows as she took care of her mother most.

We will most likely never know the complete story, we only know 1 version, of an unstable (mentioned in an article at the time) Maria Teresa who had her curious meeting with the press. Instead of racism or snobbism, it may just have been a clash of personalities, which isn't uncommon between mothers and daughters-in-law.
Marengo,

This is the version of events that I read too...that it was actually J-C who supported her son's choice to marry the woman he loved. Even venerable Grand Duke Jean was reportedly not completely on board with the idea of then-Mademoiselle Mestre as a daughter-in-law.

NotHRH

I am always very uncomfortable with rumors/allegation presenting themselves as fact. On the Internet, this type of thing tends to take on a life of it's own.

Josephine-Charlotte lost her mother in a horrific accident when she was a little girl. She and her siblings and other family were taken captive by the Nazis and mistreated at Sankt Wolfgang(Allied troops who rescued them found J-C half starved and gave her a jar of peanut butter which she devoured. Baudouin's eyesight was badly damaged for the remainder of his life, hence the thick glasses)

So no, I am not prepared to believe that J-C, who had suffered much in life and knew firsthand what extremes racism and bigotry can be taken to, rejected M-T on the basis of her race and non Royal status alone. That might be M-T's version of events but that does not constitute proof.

Marc23...thanks for the link to info on Princess Elisabeth. Fascinating!
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"If your dreams don't scare you, they are not big enough" Sir Sidney Poitier
1927-2022
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 06-18-2016, 11:29 PM
claypoint2's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cambridge, United States
Posts: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaro View Post
Even though the Habsburg empire doesn't exist for 100 years, I still expect male members to marry equally according to Habsburg house rules. You never know, mornarchy could be restored one day in one of the former crown lands.
Habsburg house rules were changed by Archduke Otto; now the only requirement is that the marriage be to a Christian woman. As a result, for example, Archduke Imre (son of Archduke Carl-Christian and of his wife, née Princess Marie-Astrid of Luxembourg) is married to an American. He did not lose his place in the order of (putative) succession, and his American wife now carries the title of Archduchess... well, socially at least... because of course the title of Archduke/Archduchess is not official anywhere. As you know, the monarchy was abolished in Austria in 1919 by the Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marriages Between Royalty & Nobility Alastair_r Royalty Past, Present, and Future 39 07-26-2022 12:41 PM
German & Austrian Royalty and Nobility Ritka Royal Library 75 11-04-2020 02:29 AM
Question about nobility through acknowledgement of indigenous titles of nobility exi Buice Member Introductions 1 03-26-2019 08:12 AM
We must say Farewell to Warren Janet H Forum Announcements and Admin 88 05-08-2017 06:21 PM




Popular Tags
#alnahyan #baby #princedubai #rashidmrm america arcadie arcadie claret british caroline charles iii claret crest current events defunct thrones edward vii elizabeth ii emperor naruhito empress masako fabio bevilacqua fallen empires fallen kingdom football garsenda genealogy general news grimaldi hamdan bin ahmed history hollywood hotel room for sale international events introduction jewels king king charles king willem-alexander leopold ier list of rulers matrilineal monaco monarchy new zealand; cyclone gabrielle official visit order of the redeemer overseas tours pamela hicks portugal preferences prince & princess of wales prince albert monaco prince christian princess of wales queen alexandra queen camilla queen elizabeth ii queen mathilde queen maxima ray mill republics restoration royals royal without thrones silk soccer spain spanish royal family state visit to france state visit to germany switzerland william


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2023
Jelsoft Enterprises