 |
|
02-14-2010, 11:20 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 1,430
|
|
|
Which royals have the most beautiful body?
Female: Queen Rania
Male: Prince Felipe
|
02-14-2010, 11:30 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 7,515
|
|
To the initial question...:No-one here knows unless you've slept with them....  ...
|
02-14-2010, 12:50 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: -, United States
Posts: 503
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rascal
Hi, Isis. I don't know what terms or expressions are used around the world to describe the orientation of a person's legs. In the United States, there are generally three:
1 - Straight - the legs generally run in a straight line up and down, very symmetrical. The legs aren't necessarily thin, just aligned in a straight vertical line like this... l l. This is supposed to be the ideal.
2 - Bow-leg - the legs "bow" outward from the up and then appear to curve inward to the feet which are still in line with the hips. The legs look like two parentheses (). They can occur on anyone but usually are seen most pronounced in people who spend a great deal of time riding horseback, like American cowboys. I don't know if the same is true for dressage and other more formal riding styles.
3 - Knock-kneed - the legs slant inward from the hip so that the knees touch and then back out to the feet which are still in line with the hips. the can best depicted like this ><. The expression refers to how the knees "knock" together. This can also occur on anyone, but people who are severely overweight or have been for most of their lives usually have this. There was a famous American named Ann Miller. She had knock-knees but gained notoriety as a dancer, later appearing in movie musicals.
Hope that answers your question!
Rascal
|
In German we call those () O-legs and those >< X-legs.
|
02-14-2010, 09:59 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lafayette, United States
Posts: 500
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilytornado
In German we call those () O-legs and those >< X-legs.
|
LOL...your X-legs reference made me think of the X-Men movies and I realized that Halle Berry has "O-legs"! 
|
02-15-2010, 02:06 AM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 208
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rascal
Hi, Isis. I don't know what terms or expressions are used around the world to describe the orientation of a person's legs. In the United States, there are generally three:
1 - Straight - the legs generally run in a straight line up and down, very symmetrical. The legs aren't necessarily thin, just aligned in a straight vertical line like this... l l. This is supposed to be the ideal.
2 - Bow-leg - the legs "bow" outward from the up and then appear to curve inward to the feet which are still in line with the hips. The legs look like two parentheses (). They can occur on anyone but usually are seen most pronounced in people who spend a great deal of time riding horseback, like American cowboys. I don't know if the same is true for dressage and other more formal riding styles.
3 - Knock-kneed - the legs slant inward from the hip so that the knees touch and then back out to the feet which are still in line with the hips. the can best depicted like this ><. The expression refers to how the knees "knock" together. This can also occur on anyone, but people who are severely overweight or have been for most of their lives usually have this. There was a famous American named Ann Miller. She had knock-knees but gained notoriety as a dancer, later appearing in movie musicals.
Hope that answers your question!
Rascal
|
thanks for explanations, I didn't know all these details 
|
02-15-2010, 09:49 AM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lafayette, United States
Posts: 500
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by loubna2
|
I agree, loubna2. In addition, Madame Chirac looks very good for her age and she always seems very elegant.
|
02-15-2010, 10:15 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,977
|
|
|
The Crown Princess of Denmark has a wonderfully toned, yet entirely feminine physique. Along with beautifully formed shoulders, HRH has great pronunciation of her clavicles' and scapulas', which are, imo, the two most alluring elements to a woman's body.
Her legs too are quite the sight!
__________________
"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
|
02-16-2010, 07:15 AM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 8,620
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZUBIAUR
I am sorry but Queen Rania´legs are not nice at all imo,as they are short,imo,not straight,and too muscular. |
Rania has short legs? 
I would call Rania's legs neither short nor muscular.
Imo she has really lovely legs.
|
02-16-2010, 07:33 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: -, Germany
Posts: 3,587
|
|
I agree, Rania has wonderful legs.
As to Diana, well... She had good legs but I always found them somehow masculine, her whole body seemed rather androgynous IMO. But then again: she was a tall woman. It is the same with Gabriella Windsor (and her "thick ankles"  ). IMO women at a height of 5'9+ mostly have "stronger" legs and you can't compare them with those of a rather petite woman like Princess Marie of Denmark e. g.
After reconsidering I think that in my very own opinion CP Mary has one of the most perfect legs - they're straight, slim but not skinny or too muscular and for that quite feminine.
|
02-16-2010, 08:28 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: -, Spain
Posts: 3,719
|
|
|
Princess Grace had perfect legs, IMO. Beautiful and feminine.
__________________
Palaces are not the ones that dignify kings; kings are the ones who honor them with their presence.
Isabel, ep. 26
|
02-16-2010, 09:02 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ******, Spain
Posts: 2,668
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Her_Majesty
Rania has short legs?
I would call Rania's legs neither short nor muscular.
Imo she has really lovely legs. |
They are short,bowlegged,and too muscular,to be polite and avoid other adjectives, they are not nice at all,imo The worst of her are her legs imo...
|
02-16-2010, 09:08 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ******, Spain
Posts: 2,668
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ANNIE_S
Princess Grace had perfect legs, IMO. Beautiful and feminine.
|
I agree,they were perfect,straight,long and not muscular at all
|
02-16-2010, 10:33 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LIEGE, Belgium
Posts: 5,443
|
|
|
Letizia has no physical defect I think....my favourite Princess is Mette-Marit
|
02-16-2010, 10:41 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ******, Spain
Posts: 2,668
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rominet09
Letizia has no physical defect I think....my favourite Princess is Mette-Marit
|
Letizia has bowlegged legs,and an excessive jaw imo,they are physical defects.,imo....
|
02-16-2010, 10:48 AM
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 8,620
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZUBIAUR
They are short,bowlegged,and too muscular,to be polite and avoid other adjectives, they are not nice at all,imoThe worst of her are her legs imo...
|
Aha, well okay. So we completely disagree here.
I really don't see anything wrong with her legs at all.
I also think it's rather rude to say Letizia's legs have "physical defects". Her legs are slender (and slender legs often look a little "bowlegged"), but I don't see any "physical defect".
|
02-16-2010, 11:00 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rom, Italy
Posts: 381
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZUBIAUR
They are short,bowlegged,and too muscular,to be polite and avoid other adjectives, they are not nice at all,imo The worst of her are her legs imo... |
I partly agree with what you've said . I wouldn't call Rania's legs ugly but there is to much space between them and that's why I think her legs is Rania's less beautiful part of her body . I have to find a pic where it's obvious . Apart from this she is an absolutely beautiful and stunning woman . Nearly perfection for me .
|
02-16-2010, 12:05 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ******, Spain
Posts: 2,668
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Her_Majesty
Aha, well okay. So we completely disagree here.
I really don't see anything wrong with her legs at all.
I also think it's rather rude to say Letizia's legs have "physical defects". Her legs are slender (and slender legs often look a little "bowlegged"), but I don't see any "physical defect". |
To have slender legs has nothing to do with being straight or not.Grace had slender and straight legs,and Diana too.I am sorry but Letizia´s legs are not straight and it is a defect ,as if a nose is not straight......I mean nobody is perfect and these are little imperfections,or defects,I do not mean to be rude at all...I mean everybody has some physical defects,so that is what surgery is made for.....the more closest to perfection physically talking is Grace kelly imo..
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
