 |
|
09-16-2010, 05:22 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: , Germany
Posts: 69,228
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NGalitzine
No, I knew that the date had been moved up a week and was going to be on the Saturday and Sunday. I thought the previous poster was suggesting the date had been changed again which I could not find in the Nice Matin article.
|
So it's been a missunderstanding, I see 
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jaya
Grace and Rainier celebrated their civil ceremony and had all the Monegasques invited as guests and asked they used their discretion in coming as they would after saying their vows go outside to toast with champagne and cake etc. SO that is where this is from and taken .
|
Jaya, I didn't say that the Caroline/Philippe wedding has been the origin
or ideas provider for the coming wedding setting, I just mentioned it as
a comparable example.
__________________
**** Welcome aboard! ****
|
09-16-2010, 05:36 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Villa San Giovanni, Italy
Posts: 4,931
|
|
|
__________________
Marika86
"It's very special, as Kate is very special. It's my way of making sure my mother didn't miss out on today and the excitement." Prince William, November 16 2010
|
09-16-2010, 06:13 PM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34
|
|
|
|
09-16-2010, 08:21 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in a corner of ..., Argentina
Posts: 2,698
|
|
|
What? Again?
__________________
* * The eyes are the mirror of the soul* *
The Impossible is what the mind can not imagine ...
|
09-16-2010, 08:57 PM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathalie Cox
What? Again?
|
Hopefully the last date change. 1st time, it was because of the Olympics Committee meeting and now... weather, perhaps? 
|
09-16-2010, 10:40 PM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ......, Argentina
Posts: 1,382
|
|
|
i don´t know if I should call this funny or ridiculous. Are they sure there´s not any important event on the 1 July? It looks like anything is more important than their wedding. Make a decision so that the invitations can be printed.
|
09-16-2010, 11:32 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: côte d'océan Pacifique, United States
Posts: 727
|
|
|
Has anyone ever seen photos of Charlene's family? I know that she has one brother, or two? Any sisters? Photos of mom and dad?
|
09-16-2010, 11:41 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 13,071
|
|
 In regards to any pictures/questions/statements about Charlene's family, you can find some information here http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...ily-28205.html .
|
09-18-2010, 01:48 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arizona, United States
Posts: 1,238
|
|
So, PA and CW changed their wedding date for the 3rd time...  Very, very strange.  It sets a lot of red flags about this relationship and the wedding. JMO.
__________________
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right - for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't.'' Eleanor Roosevelt
"The course of true love never did run smooth " William Shakespeare, 'A Midsummer Night's Dream'
https://www.aishwarya-rai.com/
|
09-18-2010, 11:12 PM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somewhere in Germany, Germany
Posts: 1,068
|
|
|
No, they didn´t change it again. It is on second and third of July. This is the one and only change. (First it was on 8/9 July)
Don´t make it worse than it is.
|
09-19-2010, 12:04 AM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: ***** *****, United States
Posts: 369
|
|
|
|
09-19-2010, 11:01 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SW FL, United States
Posts: 2,322
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thtregoddess11
|
First, it was to be held on July 8th and 9th. Then, because of a IOC meeting, it was to be held on July 2nd and 3rd. The civil ceremony is now on July 1st and religious one on the 2nd.
|
09-19-2010, 10:45 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Long Island, United States
Posts: 1,113
|
|
This is why they should of waited before announcing the date! So they can change it personally without everyone knowing. And anyone who says changing a wedding date is a bad sign has either A) never been married or B) Never helped anyone plan a wedding. So many things need to be take into consideration at a small wedding know imagine a wedding with 1,000 guests!!! They should have waited atleast 2 months after to announce the date so they could have changed it privately, but Im happy either way  Any chance the Civil ceremony will be televised? I highly doubt it :(
|
09-20-2010, 06:56 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sassenage, France
Posts: 3,864
|
|
|
Why extrapolate on the change of the weeding day? First date 8 and 9 july, there was tle comettee of ioc meeting or we know that prince Albert of Monaco wanted the family olympic around them for this event, and thereare many princes who are in this comettee and they couldnt be there for the weedding, the second time 2 and 3 july , 3 july is sunday, and sunday is the mess day for catholics and they also need priors for the service, if they are at the ceremony, there will be no mess this day and it is not very good for the catholics people. This date 1 and 2 july is a right date, friday and sunday. For the weedding in open air, I saw the cathedral it is too small for a thousand persons. Prince Albert also wants share the ceremony with monegasque people. He does want just the royal circle and personality, and people of Monaco is very pleased about this. A part this there is an "encard' called "Princier weedding" on the officiel site of the Palace of Monaco. It is empty, but soon we will have news in it. I understand the critics of the persons who hope there will not weedding.between Prince Albert and Charlene. There will surely be yet some errors but It is a big organization for a big event.
|
09-21-2010, 02:18 AM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arizona, United States
Posts: 1,238
|
|
Are these date changes made just to make media talk about wedding?... 
__________________
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right - for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't.'' Eleanor Roosevelt
"The course of true love never did run smooth " William Shakespeare, 'A Midsummer Night's Dream'
https://www.aishwarya-rai.com/
|
09-21-2010, 04:48 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sassenage, France
Posts: 3,864
|
|
|
No, I will not say that, Lakshmi, it is the fault of the advisors in the organisation who were under the press of the media who gave the dates of the weedding which were not the good.
|
09-22-2010, 12:23 AM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: côte d'océan Pacifique, United States
Posts: 727
|
|
|
From People magazine: "The couple will be tying the knot a few days earlier, in ceremonies to take place July 2 and 3. This switch will allow Albert, 52, and his 32-year old bride to attend the International Olympic Committee meeting in Durban, South Africa, from July 5 until 9."
I would not want to spend my honeymoon at a meeting - even if it is in Durban. An Olympic committee meeting? How un-romantic. Perhaps at first, the palace thought that the committee meeting was not that important and Prince Albert could miss it, but then realized that some of the potential wedding guests would be at the committee meeting and therefore, would be unable to attend both the wedding and the Olympic meeting. I think that this wedding will turn into a Olympic-sized event anyway. Remember the chaos that surrounded Prince Rainier and Grace Kelly's wedding?
|
09-22-2010, 01:22 AM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: ***** *****, United States
Posts: 369
|
|
FYI, on the ENGLISH version of the palace website, there is now a link under the institution link labeled " Royal Wedding" on this it links to Official Biographies, interviews, photos and media information...however, on any of the links there's just one liner "Discover all the information about the Royal Wedding soon."
EDIT: it's also on the French version of the site-I'm assuming with the same info....
Perhaps all the wonders and speculations of the wedding will be cleared up when this info hits the site....
|
09-29-2010, 10:58 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sassenage, France
Posts: 3,864
|
|
|
to day on the palace website, in the link called "royal wedding", there are photos of Charlene and the prince Albert on the link photos, but we know them already, and in the french version there is the first interview of the prince Albert on Nice Matin the to morrow of the engagement
|
09-29-2010, 01:32 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaya
I agree fandesacs - things were stricter in my day- and the rules greater.Grace did not wear a tiara and she put on pearl earrings for the photos - she did not have them on at the church wedding.The wedding attire of a bride was to be complete in and of itself.I also remember the rule about the not wearing white or bright colours around the bride as a mark of respect that it is her day and respecting her so as not to upstage her.
And as for black at a wedding that was uneard of in my day but nowadays everybody does what they please.And it is different from culture to culture.
|
PGrace didn't wear a tiara at her wedding, but she did wear a white suit to Charles & Diana's wedding. I remember thinking to myself --- "what is she DOING???" It had a smudge of lipstick on the lapel, too.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
