The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 02-03-2015, 11:44 AM
muriel's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,711
British Jewels: Suggested Changes

I thought we could let our creativity loose in one place for any suggested changes to the jewels of the British royal family.

[Mod. Note: the 2nd part of this post has been copied from the thread 'Swedish jewels: suggested changes']

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefan View Post
But the ruby Parure which was changed by Mary can be changed back to it's original form with the ecxeption of the tiara.
I think i found it quiet strange when i read in the Queens Diamonds that Queen Mary even broke up Jewels she had got as Wedding gifts to make other Jewels out from the diamonds and pearls who sometimes (the fringe tiara for example) resembled Jewels she had already for her use.
You are right, the tiara cannot be converted back and the changes to it are permanent. I view the changes that Mary made as quite positive, it makes the tiara far more suitable for her. I also think the changes to the earrings and necklace make them far more wearable for her.

As regards Queen Mary's changes, fact is that a lot of royal ladies have made changes. Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother altered a tiara she received from her husband, the resultant tiara is the Lotus leaf / Papyrus tiara used by Princess Margaret, and more recently, Catherine. QE2 herself broke up the Nizam tiara to make the Burmese Ruby tiara.

IMO, these things are of no use if the user cannot adapt them to suit their needs. You cannot be a hostage to history for all of these things. The lineage of the jewels is important, and IMO, any changes made sympathetically ought to be adaptable. That said, hypothetically speaking, I would not condone Camilla breaking up Queen Victoria's small diamond crown to make a necklace for herself. However, if she had it remade to fit her better, I think that would be perfectly acceptable. After all, the Imperial State Crown has been remade several times in its history.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2015, 11:47 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
You are right, the tiara cannot be converted back and the changes to it are permanent. I view the changes that Mary made as quite positive, it makes the tiara far more suitable for her. I also think the changes to the earrings and necklace make them far more wearable for her.

As regards Queen Mary's changes, fact is that a lot of royal ladies have made changes. Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother altered a tiara she received from her husband, the resultant tiara is the Lotus leaf / Papyrus tiara used by Princess Margaret, and more recently, Catherine. QE2 herself broke up the Nizam tiara to make the Burmese Ruby tiara.

IMO, these things are of no use if the user cannot adapt them to suit their needs. You cannot be a hostage to history for all of these things. The lineage of the jewels is important, and IMO, any changes made sympathetically ought to be adaptable. That said, hypothetically speaking, I would not condone Camilla breaking up Queen Victoria's small diamond crown to make a necklace for herself. However, if she had it remade to fit her better, I think that would be perfectly acceptable. After all, the Imperial State Crown has been remade several times in its history.
I agree with you. The bad part is we won't know if the queen doing the changes will make it better. Often it does. But then we have the Nizam-Burmese spectacle. Hurts me every time I see it.... Such a bad decision!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2015, 11:52 AM
muriel's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,711
I would love to see some relatively minor alterations made to Queen Elisabeth's Burmese ruby tiaras. I think interspersing the ruby roses with a few diamonds would considerably lighten the rose and improve the design, and potentially address quite a lot of the criticism the tiara currently attracts.


http://orderofsplendor.blogspot.co.u...uby-tiara.html
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2015, 11:57 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
I would love to see some relatively minor alterations made to Queen Elisabeth's Burmese ruby tiaras. I think interspersing the ruby roses with a few diamonds would considerably lighten the rose and improve the design, and potentially address quite a lot of the criticism the tiara currently attracts.


The Royal Order of Sartorial Splendor: Tiara Thursday: The Burmese Ruby Tiara
Great initiative

I agree. I would love making it more tiara like and less the crown style it is today.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2015, 11:59 AM
muriel's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by hernameispekka View Post
Great initiative

I agree. I would love making it more tiara like and less the crown style it is today.
Not that it is for me to suggest to HM of how a tiara might be worn, but I think it could appear less "crown like" just by changing how it is worn. If worn further back and at an angle, it would appear a lot more tiara like, IMO.


When Camilla went to the Dutch inauguration dinner, she wore the Greville tiara a lot further back than she usually does. To me, it looked very different, and a lot less formal than usual.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2015, 12:04 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
Not that it is for me to suggest to HM of how a tiara might be worn, but I think it could appear less "crown like" just by changing how it is worn. If worn further back and at an angle, it would appear a lot more tiara like, IMO.


When Camilla went to the Dutch inauguration dinner, she wore the Greville tiara a lot further back than she usually does. To me, it looked very different, and a lot less formal than usual.
That might be true. And I understand why QEII made this tiara because that shape seems to be her preferred one. I just have a really hard time liking that format.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-03-2015, 03:13 PM
Stefan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 4,980
What would be really nice if they would have another emerald tiara apart from the Vladimir tiara with the emerald drops. Perhaps they could break up one of the several emerald necklaces to make a tiara out of it.
I weould also restore the Lovers Knot tiara to it's original state and put the upright pearl spikes back on it.
__________________
Stefan



Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2015, 03:16 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,832
I think it would be nice just to see the Lovers Knot tiara again.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-2015, 03:27 PM
Tilia C.'s Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: O, Germany
Posts: 5,571
The aquamarine tiara could do with some improvements as well. But at the moment I have no good idea how to achieve that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-03-2015, 03:35 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
I'm happy with the Burmese as it currently stands, but a sprinkling of diamonds in the roses sounds lovely..

My MAJOR gripe is the lack of a sapphire tiara worthy of the name.. I wish they'd flog the 'pretend' tiara/necklace atrocity, and use the money for some decent sized cabouchon drops to dangle from the Vladimir [and add as detachable spikes to the GGBI...

Or [better still] badger the Harewoods for the return of Prince Alberts masterpiece...

For this [and the next reign], the Aquamarine tiara is fine [Camilla will really 'work' it], but I cannot imagine Catherine in it.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-04-2015, 01:38 AM
Queen Camilla's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,861
The Aquamarine, IMO, can be improved by removing the large stone in the front.

I can see Camilla wearing one of the fans on either side of the large stone as a brooch.

If all the top parts are removable then it would look nice on Kate or Sophie with their hair worn up.

The matching necklace needs to stay in the vault or made into separate brooches. Each aquamarine section should be a separate necklace or a separate brooch.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-04-2015, 02:13 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,886
I would love if they got a few more set's of jewels for the Vladimir Tiara. It's such an easy change to make.

I made a sapphire version on Photoshop. I think it would look great on Kate.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...765afd180f.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-04-2015, 02:15 AM
IloveCP's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: -, United States
Posts: 11,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by hernameispekka View Post
I would love if they got a few more set's of jewels for the Vladimir Tiara. It's such an easy change to make.

I made a sapphire version on Photoshop. I think it would look great on Kate.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...765afd180f.jpg
What a beautiful tiara!

I always thought the Cambridge Pearl tiara would looks absolutely breathtaking if the pearls were replaced with dangling rubies.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-04-2015, 02:20 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by IloveCP View Post
What a beautiful tiara!

I always thought the Cambridge Pearl tiara would looks absolutely breathtaking if the pearls were replaced with dangling rubies.
Oh, that sounds pretty! *Writes down on my mental inspiration list*

I think they would have great use of having loose pendants. Maybe the same pendants could be used on both those tiaras?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-04-2015, 05:07 AM
muriel's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Camilla View Post
The Aquamarine, IMO, can be improved by removing the large stone in the front.

I can Camilla wearing one of the fans on either side of the large stone as a brooch.

If all the top parts are removable then it would look nice on Kate or Sophie with their hair worn up.

The matching necklace needs to stay in the vault or made into separate brooches. Each aquamarine section should be a separate necklace or a separate brooch.

I actually really like the aquamarine necklace, and I hope that it is not altered.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-04-2015, 05:09 AM
muriel's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
My MAJOR gripe is the lack of a sapphire tiara worthy of the name.. I wish they'd flog the 'pretend' tiara/necklace atrocity, and use the money for some decent sized cabouchon drops to dangle from the Vladimir [and add as detachable spikes to the GGBI...

Or [better still] badger the Harewoods for the return of Prince Alberts masterpiece...

For this [and the next reign], the Aquamarine tiara is fine [Camilla will really 'work' it], but I cannot imagine Catherine in it.
I take your point about the lack of a serious sapphire tiara. Perhaps the Dubai necklace could be reworked into a nice sapphire and diamond tiara.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-04-2015, 05:16 AM
Queen Camilla's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
I actually really like the aquamarine necklace, and I hope that it is not altered.
Are we talking about the same one?

I was writing about this one.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...b852e42707.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-04-2015, 05:21 AM
muriel's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Camilla View Post
Are we talking about the same one?

I was writing about this one.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...b852e42707.jpg
Yes, the same necklace. This is not a great picture.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-04-2015, 07:41 AM
Marengo's Avatar
Administrator
Royal Blogger, TRF Author
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 21,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by IloveCP View Post
What a beautiful tiara!

I always thought the Cambridge Pearl tiara would looks absolutely breathtaking if the pearls were replaced with dangling rubies.
I think that rubies of that size are rather difficult to find. They usually tend to be small.
__________________
TRF Rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-04-2015, 08:19 AM
Stefan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 4,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
I would love to see some relatively minor alterations made to Queen Elisabeth's Burmese ruby tiaras. I think interspersing the ruby roses with a few diamonds would considerably lighten the rose and improve the design, and potentially address quite a lot of the criticism the tiara currently attracts.


The Royal Order of Sartorial Splendor: Tiara Thursday: The Burmese Ruby Tiara
Waht i would change at the ruby tiara are to remove or replace this diamond antennas between the ruby roses.
__________________

__________________
Stefan



Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british, jewels, queen elizabeth, royal


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spanish Royal Jewels: Suggested changes and additions muriel Royal Jewels General Discussion 50 06-20-2020 02:04 AM
Dutch Jewels: Suggested Changes and Alterations muriel Royal Jewels General Discussion 37 03-12-2020 01:57 PM
Swedish Jewels: Suggested Changes muriel Royal Jewels General Discussion 43 10-13-2019 07:41 AM
Suggested changes or additional features RhapsodyBrat Forum Announcements and Admin 51 07-13-2011 10:59 AM




Popular Tags
#royalrelatives #royalgenes althorp anastasia anastasia once upon a time ancestry belgian royal belgian royal family belgium chittagong cht crown princess victoria danish royalty diana princess of wales dna dutch royal family dutch royals emperor family tree games haakon vii hill history house of bernadotte house of glucksburg house of grimaldi interesting intro israel jacobite jewellery jumma kids movie list of rulers lithuania lithuanian palaces mailing mary: crown princess of denmark monogram mountbatten nepalese royal jewels netflix nobel prize norwegian royal family popularity princely family of monaco princess elizabeth princess margaret pronunciation queen mathilde queen paola rown royal balls royal court royal jewels royal wedding russian court dress snowdon spain spanish royal spencer family sweden swedish history thailand tracts uae customs united states of america unsubscribe videos wedding gown wittelsbach


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×