Firstly, I have to say Lena that as one of the moderators of this forum (the Swedish forum as well as the rest of the forum as a whole), you should get lots of credit for creating scintillating discussion in your forum's threads!
It's not just pictures and articles, but very interesting, sometimes even provocative attempts to create discussions! Great job!
I am bringing the discussion back to one of the first points in this thread as I am going through something right now in my personal life that is sort of parallel to this discussion of Victoria and Daniel being asked to give up their passions or duties in life for the other. (A pre-warning: Likely too much information will be shared about my life at this point. As understandably not everybody will care about Alexandria's personal life and her relationships, now's a good time to skip to the next post if you do not care to hear my whining! I think my friends wish they could skip to the next post, too!
)
Lena said:
When Victoria says, that she wouldn´t give up the throne...would this also mean, that she wouldn´t give up the throne, when she would notice, that her boyfriend couldn´t live with the idea of becoming a prince consort?
In the interview (as we know it) it doesn´t come out, if the force (in this theoretical question) would come from the outside (Monarch, government, people) or from the other part in the relationship.
So the provocative additional question is:
Is it then fair to ask Daniel to give up his gyms, when she wouldn´t do the "same"?
In brief (well, as brief as
I am capable of!), I have been dating someone who has a very unique job. He is a helicopter pilot and travels frequently for his job, with various assignments and tasks. Within the last year he has gone on polar bear rescue missions, flown adventure travellers into the wilderness for fishing and skiing expeditions, etc. Last summer he spent four months in the Arctic with diamond miners (first flying in the miners, then on a weekly basis, food, supplies and the like). He has chosen again to go this year through the summer. Since I've learned the news, it has been upsetting (a major understatement!) to know that we'll be apart all summer without much communication -- he will have no access to phones or the internet during the entire time.
This last week I have been in a daze at work and had many sleepless nights because of this "issue." Ultimately, deep inside of myself I know that I am being petty to be so upset with him because this is his job and he
loves his job with a capital L. And it isn't fair to ask that he stay home so that he can call me nightly and e-mail me funny jokes.
I am a realist (to steal a phrase from Lena!) but also a romantic. The realist in me knows that I would be mighty mad at him if he ever told me to stop doing something I loved, to give up one of my passions in life for his sake (especially if it didn't physically hurt or endanger me or him). But the romantic in me wants him around even if just to know that he's around and we have nothing to say to each other. (Well, it is me, so I always have something to say so that would not ever be an issue!) In this case, although I think romanticism should win out always, the realist is in the right: I could never ask him to not go on this trip or that trip, or to give up his job, if I wasn't willing to sacrifice something in return. I think relationships are about compromise -- sometimes one person has to give up something and other times the other person will. For me, I know that this relationship is full of challenges (good thing I like challenging relationships!), his job being the first one, and maybe in the (far, far, far!) future where we will live. But along the way we'll have to learn to compromise small things.
So, about Victoria and Daniel: They are of course not in my position. To ask the special person in my life to give up his job (or at least this particular assignment of his job) is not to ask him to give up something that he has been groomed for his entire life, and for which an entire nation depends on him for as is the case of Victoria. I don't know a lot about Daniel, but I would think that he would be smart enough to know that when he started dating Victoria he was not dating a mere Swedish girl, that she is someone with a unique task ahead of her and a pre-set life with duties and obligations she must keep. It would be unfair of Daniel to ask of Victoria, just as it is unfair of me to ask the special person in my life, to give up something she/he loves as "proof" or for the "sake" of our love and our relationship.
So is it fair to ask Daniel to give up his gyms for Victoria? By the above measurement, no. But the role of a future Queen of a nation is different and distinct, because were Victoria to give up the throne to be with Daniel, it is not just the two of them who would be affected (as would be the case for me). It would be a decision that would affect many other people and create ripples -- it would affect Carl Philip (and possibly Emma) as he would succeed his sister, it would affect the rest of the royal family, it would affect the government (they would have to train Carl Philip and include him ini government meetings), and it would affect the Swedish people. That is asking for a lot of people to change how they've been living their lives so that you can keep running some gyms, no matter how successful they are.
The romantic in me has always believed that if and when you love someone so completely, you would put aside your own happiness for this other's happiness, that that is the essence of true love. And so my special person is going to the Arctic with my blessing because I care a lot about him and I care about what he loves in life, including his job -- wherever it takes him. I am making a (small) sacrifice for the sake of us because I think that he is worth it, but also that
we are worth it.
If Daniel loves Victoria with all his heart, I would hope that since her job is the significant one of the two (no denying that), he would make a (huge) sacrifice for her in giving up his gyms -- but realize that in return he would get something better in return: an entire life with her and her love, at his side.