 |
|

02-21-2012, 05:47 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: casablanca, Morocco
Posts: 297
|
|
i think we have to wait for another week before the birth
__________________
|

02-21-2012, 03:09 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Schweinfurt, Germany
Posts: 3,654
|
|
Will the baby styled as Heriditary Prince/ss or just as Prince/ss?
__________________
__________________
I had a dream: Let's connect our thoughts together, than we have a mission, let's connect our feelings together, than we have a mood, let's connect our dreams together, than we have a vision and let's connect our mission, our mood and our vision together than we have a perfect life.
|

02-21-2012, 03:22 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,200
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by principessa
Will the baby styled as Heriditary Prince/ss or just as Prince/ss?
|
According to Wikipedia, King Carl Gustaf was Hereditary Prince from 1946 to 1950 when he became Crown Prince. I'm not sure how accurate that is, though.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_...staf_of_Sweden
Victoria obviously never held the title as she was born after her father became King.
|

02-21-2012, 03:41 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 1,565
|
|
According to Wikipedia, arvfurst is a title that was used by all the princes that was in line for the throne. The title was lost along with the inheritance of those who were married in contravention of the Act of Succession. In 1981 it was changed to Prince of Sweden. And it was also used by Gustaf Adolf who was second-in-line.
I doubt that the little prince/princess will get the title of arvfurste/arvfurstinna, of course I maybe mistaken, but I think it might be a little contradictory when the current tendency is to downsize the royal family. i.e. were Jonas to marry Madeleine, then he would only be a duke and not a prince.
|

02-21-2012, 04:08 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LONDON, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
|
|
If she is still out and about doing engagements it looks like nothing much will happen until March. As for boy/girl. I believe the couple don't know either??
|

02-21-2012, 04:09 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southwest, Finland
Posts: 33,072
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by angieuk
If she is still out and about doing engagements it looks like nothing much will happen until March. As for boy/girl. I believe the couple don't know either??
|
Well, Daniel has said two times in an interview, that they haven´t found out, if it is a boy or a girl.
|

02-21-2012, 04:24 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,045
|
|
wow! victoria look perfect in the last days of her pregnancy., she really is an example of princess, I think she will work until the same day to the baby born! I cant wait!
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
|

02-22-2012, 01:57 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southwest, Finland
Posts: 33,072
|
|
Victoria and Daniel will get child allowance from the Social Insurance. Whether they like it or not. "This is not something one chooses but it goes to all parents," says Mats Mattsson, Manager of Insurance to DN.se.
But that's just Daniel who can get full maternity benefits, because the royal apanage - Victoria's "salary" - not counted as income on .
- If you have a job that provides a sickness benefit based income so you get the compensation from it. Victoria has had the appanage, which is not there, and she has a right to a basic level of 180 SEK a day. But then you should not work but take a care for your children, says Mats Mattsson.
Daniel Westling stated in his declaration of 2010 the taxed income of SEK 652 300 and more than 1.5 million in reported surplus of capital, according to Insurance.
This means that he "hit the roof" for the highest sickness benefit income that is 440 000 SEK per year. Daniel can therefore at most get 935 SEK per day in parental allowance. But then he should have had to run his gym to get full parental allowance.
Victoria och Daniel måste ta emot barnbidrag - DN.SE
Google translation
|

02-22-2012, 08:24 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,559
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyFinn
Victoria and Daniel will get child allowance from the Social Insurance. Whether they like it or not. "This is not something one chooses but it goes to all parents," says Mats Mattsson, Manager of Insurance to DN.se.
ta emot barnbidrag - DN.SE
Google translation
|
Isn´t that funny? I am just imagining, whow they are fighting internally at the Insurance, who is the "lucky guy" to deliver the "child allowance" to CP Victoria and Daniel. 
BYe Bine
|

02-22-2012, 08:29 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 14,093
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyFinn
Victoria and Daniel will get child allowance from the Social Insurance. Whether they like it or not. "This is not something one chooses but it goes to all parents," says Mats Mattsson, Manager of Insurance to DN.se.
|
Its true. There was a huge discussion about Michael Schumacher getting child allowance because he didnt want it, he doesnt even live in Germany. He urged politicians to only give it to people with a specific income = not to the super-rich but it isnt possible. In the end, he decided to donate it to charity.
|

02-22-2012, 08:54 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 2,855
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyFinn
Victoria and Daniel will get child allowance from the Social Insurance. Whether they like it or not.
|
Just imagine the costs of having to check the income of all parents! And even if soembody earns more or is rich or even super-rich: their child will one day be responsible for paying for the state one way or another (think inheritance tax) and thus the state helps a bit with the costs of childraising. Some sort of investing in the infrastructure of the state..Like paying for repairs on the streets and everybody is allowed ot walk there, rich and poor.
|

02-22-2012, 09:07 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Riga, Latvia
Posts: 2,283
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|