 |
|

01-17-2019, 07:02 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 23,855
|
|
Let's keep the sitting American president out of this thread & move on.
__________________
|

02-28-2020, 03:31 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 8,872
|
|
President Abraham Lincoln sent a letter of condolence to Queen Victoria after the demise of Prince Albert.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/ab...ibitionn107351
__________________
|

04-29-2020, 05:09 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 386
|
|
In June of 1961, Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Philip Duke of Edinbourgh met John F. Kennedy and his wife Jackie visited Buckingham Palace for the first time.
Here the photo of the meeting:
https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod...h&resize=768:*
|

04-29-2020, 05:13 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 11,994
|
|
Without any doubt: Barack Obama and George H.W. Bush because these two presidents were closest to what Europeans consider as standard norms and values on society, policy and personality. I would have enlisted Bill Clinton here, was he not so tarnished later in his presidency.
|

10-28-2020, 06:17 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 7,352
|
|
exploring three possible lines of succession if George Washington had become the first king instead of first president of the United States of America.
What do all of you consider the most likely line of succession?
|

10-28-2020, 09:13 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 7,812
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody
exploring three possible lines of succession if George Washington had become the first king instead of first president of the United States of America.
What do all of you consider the most likely line of succession?
|
Following a point of divergence in the timeline (as alternate history writers say), a new timeline arises. In this case, the descendants of King George I of the Washington dynasty are not guaranteed to be the same persons as the descendants of President George Washington in our timeline, so your question is impossible to answer.
|

10-28-2020, 09:33 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 7,352
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno
Following a point of divergence in the timeline (as alternate history writers say), a new timeline arises. In this case, the descendants of King George I of the Washington dynasty are not guaranteed to be the same persons as the descendants of President George Washington in our timeline, so your question is impossible to answer.
|
Of course, as is acknowledged by the creator of the video. However, what do you think would be the most likely successor for George Washington himself: his adopted son, his nephew by his elder half-brother Augustine, his nephew by his younger brother John - or, one that I would add: his nephew by his younger brother Samuel?
|

10-14-2021, 05:18 PM
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Los Angeles area, United States
Posts: 100
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody
Of course, as is acknowledged by the creator of the video. However, what do you think would be the most likely successor for George Washington himself: his adopted son, his nephew by his elder half-brother Augustine, his nephew by his younger brother John - or, one that I would add: his nephew by his younger brother Samuel?
|
In such a scenario, might the US have an elective monarchy similar to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth or present-day Cambodia? If so, then presumably the American nobles would have chosen a new monarch after George Washington's death--and not necessarily from his George Washington's family. Rather, it could have been some member of the American nobility being chosen to be the new US monarch after George Washington's death. Thomas Jefferson, perhaps? Or James Madison? Or John Adams? Or even some "dark horse" candidate?
|

10-14-2021, 05:20 PM
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Los Angeles area, United States
Posts: 100
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by princeofitaly
|
Quite amazing, when you think about it! Queen Elizabeth II was already reigning back when Harry Truman was US President! In fact, she has literally seen a whopping 14 US Presidents during her reign!
|

12-13-2021, 08:43 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Bandung, Indonesia
Posts: 37
|
|
I really can’t see America becoming a monarchy at any moment. Not only is its government system rooted in rebellion against the prevailing system, but nowadays monarchy carries connotations of nepotism and privilege, which reeks of stagnation at best and regression at worst. Sure it’s fun to imagine a scenario where American Royals is a reality, but that comes across as wishful thinking that ignores the challenges real royals face. Even the abundance of various prominent families doesn’t help. Should America change its government type, I’d say it’ll go for a parliamentary republic instead.
__________________
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|