 |
|

09-07-2007, 08:44 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,978
|
|
Beatrix Fan---those are interesting choices--I rather like Beryl. How did you come to fancy them?
__________________
__________________
Janet
"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
|

09-07-2007, 10:27 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
Posts: 375
|
|
If they opted for a name like Beverley, Kim, or Hilary, it would do for a boy or a girl ....
__________________
|

09-07-2007, 12:10 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,862
|
|
Quote:
Beatrix Fan---those are interesting choices--I rather like Beryl. How did you come to fancy them?
|
Well, I've always thought it'd be rather funny to have a Prince Eggbert so a Lord Eggbert would be the next best thing but I actually like the name Beryl and it's got a lovely meaning apparantly so I think Lady Beryl Mountbatten-Windsor would be quite grand.
__________________
Kaye aka BeatrixFan
|

09-07-2007, 12:34 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Minneapolis, United States
Posts: 221
|
|
I like Philip Edward Robert James.
For a girl, Sophie Julie Victoria Anne.
Or some combination of those names.
|

09-14-2007, 10:11 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eden, United States
Posts: 12
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99
HM The Queen's full name is Elizabeth Alexandra Mary. Perhaps Lady Alexandra Caroline Frances Windsor-Mountbatten?
|
wow...that's interesting.....I named my daughter Alexandra Caroline and my middle name is Frances (that I've always hated)
I only entertained English queen names for my daughter for several reasons.....1) they're classic 2) I'm from North Carolina and Caroline is a nod to the home state I so love 3) they'll carry her well through her entire life......Grandma Brittany will just sound strange in 60 years :stuart:
|

09-20-2007, 09:32 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 17
|
|
For a girl I think it highly likely either Lady Elizabeth-Mary, Lady Mary, or lady May. I felt Louise was a bit of a surprise. they probably expected a boy. If
he had been a boy it would have been Lord Louis Mountbatten-Windsor for sure. The supposed connection with Queen Louise of Sweden istoo tenous. But Lord Phillip or Lord Louis could still be the go. But what about something
left of centre ,Lord Juan Carlos, that would put the cats amongst the pigeons. Or Lord Humphrey?
|

09-20-2007, 09:36 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 17
|
|
There are lots of fabulous 'berts' from the early middle ages. Adelbert, Egbert, Camembert etc. Even Croquembert shouldn't be discounted. Pity the poor lad at Eton though... he's a croque!!!!
|

09-20-2007, 02:27 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,090
|
|
I'll bet there will be the name Victoria in there somewhere!
|

09-20-2007, 02:36 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Springfield, United States
Posts: 570
|
|
If the baby is a girl, I like Alexandra Helen Margaret Mary. For a boy, I LOVE George Philip Albert Christopher or George Philip Edward Christopher.
__________________
His sense of responsibility is not less than yours or mine. How could we tell right from wrong as simple people in any kind of situation? How could we know that our courage, loyalty and lives were not misused for evil purposes?
|

09-20-2007, 04:14 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Des Moines, United States
Posts: 2,402
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
Well, I've always thought it'd be rather funny to have a Prince Eggbert so a Lord Eggbert would be the next best thing but I actually like the name Beryl and it's got a lovely meaning apparantly so I think Lady Beryl Mountbatten-Windsor would be quite grand.
|
I suspect no Beryl. It harkens back to the dangerous times of the 1920s and 1930s, when Beryl Markham, a famous aviatrix, was a lover of the Duke of Gloucester and possibly the Duke of Kent. (How strange it is to think of the staid but irritable Duke of Gloucester having a wild fling -- the Queen's uncle that is, not the current incumbent!)
I'm still sticking with Alice, although I love Alexandra too. But I bet since there's a Louise, Alice would be a natural... especially since Edward probably spent a lot of time with his grandmother, Princess Alice.
I have NO opinion if it's a male.
|

09-21-2007, 05:08 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -, Hungary
Posts: 178
|
|
I was very happy to hear of Sophie and Edward having a second child, yet a bit afraid. Hopefully she will give birth to a lovely boy this time, but I think they would be just as happy for a little girl too.
I think if the baby will be a boy, he will be named George Philip Edward Christopher.
If a girl, I think she will be named Sophie Charlotte Victoria Daisy.
|

09-21-2007, 08:55 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -, Hungary
Posts: 178
|
|
Daisy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal Fan
Daisy? How about Desiree
|
correct me if I am wrong, but once the Countess of Wessex said that she liked the name Daisy, but it was not a very regal name and they did not use it. that is why I have said Daisy.
|

09-21-2007, 09:25 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 779
|
|
Girl: Caroline Anne Sophia Jane or Amelia Jane Sophie Alexandra
Boy: James Richard Edward Phillip or David John Alexander Arthur
|

09-21-2007, 09:51 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,547
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fashionista100
Boy: James Richard Edward Phillip or David John Alexander Arthur
|
The royal family will not use John. Its considered unlucky. Apparently Diana wanted to call one of her boys John & was told no.
As for David it is Viscount Linley's name but is not popular within the family due to its connection with the Duke of Windsor.
I think that Albert Phillip George Arthur might be more likely
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
|

09-24-2007, 04:10 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Des Moines, United States
Posts: 2,402
|
|
I had a thought.... Edward is supposed to be close to Princess Anne, so maybe Anne. But I would rather they choose another name. (Sorry, Princess Royal.)
|

09-24-2007, 08:36 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,547
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal Fan
Frederick Albert Nicholas Arthur
|
Then they could ask CP Fred & CPncss Mary to be godparents?
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
|

09-27-2007, 08:36 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hamilton, United Kingdom
Posts: 123
|
|
I don't think they will pick an old fashioned name like albert or Frederick. Louise is quite modern so I think it will match that but still be approporate for a Royal baby.
|

09-28-2007, 07:53 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,547
|
|
What about
Albert Edward George Phillip
or
Edwina Georgina Phillipa Alberta
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
|

10-01-2007, 05:55 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, United States
Posts: 4,070
|
|
Okay, here goes:
Male: Philip Albert Arthur Edward Charles (he's special, he get 5! :) )
Female: Jane Isabella Catherine Anne.
|

10-04-2007, 01:00 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: .., Argentina
Posts: 156
|
|
i'd guess they will have a little surprise in it, and also, like said before, maybe kind of an historic name, which is still modern :]
well i m laughing about names like edwina and i'd say that they wouldn t choose those because the children are supposed to life a normal life, but with them, you are really special anyway
__________________
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|