The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #3741  
Old 02-09-2020, 01:06 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Betsypaige View Post
Oh, Andrew isnít a patch on the Duke of Windsor, who honestly was a dangerous man. He sympathized with the Nazis, he was photographed with Hitler and he was actively trying to undermine his brother so that he could possibly become King again. He wasnít welcome at all in the UK.
And Andrew has been friends with a criminal who committed suicide... who has mixed with other dodgy people so as ot make money.. and who used the said criminal to procure girls for him who were barely of legal age.
Reply With Quote
  #3742  
Old 02-09-2020, 02:14 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Woodbury, United States
Posts: 2,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
And Andrew has been friends with a criminal who committed suicide... who has mixed with other dodgy people so as ot make money.. and who used the said criminal to procure girls for him who were barely of legal age.
I'm very well aware of that, and that still doesn't compare to the enormity of the betrayal committed by Edward VIII and then when he was Duke of Windsor. Andrew has severe moral shortcomings, quite clearly - no one is saying he doesn't - but there's just no comparison between the two.
Reply With Quote
  #3743  
Old 02-09-2020, 08:28 PM
Zonk's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 13,078
Let's stay on topic.
__________________
.

Reply With Quote
  #3744  
Old 02-10-2020, 05:15 AM
Lady Daly's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sherwood, United States
Posts: 865
The Telegraph on Feb. 9, 2020 reported that Prince Andrew's name had been removed from the Pitch@Palace home page.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...ace-home-page/

"The Duke of York's flagship business project appears to be distancing itself from the royal in the wake of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. A reference to the Duke has also been deleted from a page explaining the schemeís history, which now no longer identifies him as the businessís founder. What is left of the business has now been kicked out of its Buckingham Palace base and is being run from an office space in nearby Victoria by Amanda Thirsk, the Dukeís former private secretary and Johan Eliasch, a sports tycoon and close friend of the Duke."

"Buckingham Palace sought to distance itself from the Dukeís activities after it emerged he had attended a dinner hosted by the Chinese ambassador to Britain, Liu Xiaoming." https://news.sky.com/story/prince-an...virus-11929728

It seems like Andrew has had another stumble regarding his recent dinner at the Chinese Ambassadors home. The plan was to reorganize Pitch@Palace but it appears the plan was moved forward much sooner distancing from BP and from Prince Andrew.
Reply With Quote
  #3745  
Old 02-10-2020, 07:53 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
And Andrew has been friends with a criminal who committed suicide... who has mixed with other dodgy people so as ot make money.. and who used the said criminal to procure girls for him who were barely of legal age.
Some of the posts on here would land you in court if in a printed newspaper.
Double standards.
Reply With Quote
  #3746  
Old 02-10-2020, 09:33 AM
O-H Anglophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Daly View Post
The Telegraph on Feb. 9, 2020 reported that Prince Andrew's name had been removed from the Pitch@Palace home page.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...ace-home-page/

"The Duke of York's flagship business project appears to be distancing itself from the royal in the wake of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. A reference to the Duke has also been deleted from a page explaining the schemeís history, which now no longer identifies him as the businessís founder. What is left of the business has now been kicked out of its Buckingham Palace base and is being run from an office space in nearby Victoria by Amanda Thirsk, the Dukeís former private secretary and Johan Eliasch, a sports tycoon and close friend of the Duke."

"Buckingham Palace sought to distance itself from the Dukeís activities after it emerged he had attended a dinner hosted by the Chinese ambassador to Britain, Liu Xiaoming." https://news.sky.com/story/prince-an...virus-11929728

It seems like Andrew has had another stumble regarding his recent dinner at the Chinese Ambassadors home. The plan was to reorganize Pitch@Palace but it appears the plan was moved forward much sooner distancing from BP and from Prince Andrew.
I donít think the dinner with the Chinese Ambassador had anything to do with Pitch-it hasnít been Pitch@Palace since Andrew was stepped down from being working Royal. Amanda was let go from BP and moved on to the renamed Pitch at the same time, months ago.
Reply With Quote
  #3747  
Old 02-10-2020, 12:20 PM
Lady Daly's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sherwood, United States
Posts: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-H Anglophile View Post
I don’t think the dinner with the Chinese Ambassador had anything to do with Pitch-it hasn’t been Pitch@Palace since Andrew was stepped down from being working Royal. Amanda was let go from BP and moved on to the renamed Pitch at the same time, months ago.
Thank you for that clarification O-H Anglophile. I did a fairly exhaustive research re:Pitch@Palace before posting this as I too was aware Andrew was being reduced. The Telegraph article came up in my newsfeed last night and after actually reading it, it appeared that Andrew just wasn't being reduced but severed.

This mornings newsfeed has the BBC also reporting an update with regard to Andrews relationship with Pitch@Palace.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-51442662.

The BBC states: "The company, owned by the prince, had already moved from its Buckingham Palace base into new office space. Now, the initiative has removed mention of the prince's name from its website."

BBC goes on to say: "Until recently, its website welcomed visitors with the words: 'The Duke of York founded Pitch@Palace to provide a platform to amplify and accelerate the work of entrepreneurs.' But as first reported in the Telegraph, that message has now been replaced with a note saying that Pitch@Palace is taking the first part of 2020 to 'refresh the brand'. Some, but not all, pictures of Prince Andrew have also been removed from the website.The UK arm of Pitch@Palace is currently being wound up but its global operations remain active. It is not known whether the prince will play an active role in the initiative going forward."

So, I think this may not be old news, but new in regard to Andrew having anything to do with the ongoing Global arm as we already knew the UK arm was being disbanded."

But, maybe The Telegraph and BBC have it wrong and you are correct that this is all old news. It's difficult to keep up with the ongoing details and if there is any connection, as the Telegraph reports, to Andrews recent dinner at the Chinese Ambassadors and the further distancing by Pitch@Palace.

BTW - Pitch@Palace is still Pitch@Palace not Pitch-it. https://pitchatpalace.com/
Reply With Quote
  #3748  
Old 02-15-2020, 01:16 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 780
I'm just going to leave this here - Prince Andrew is named in another sex scandal
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ung-women.html
Reply With Quote
  #3749  
Old 02-15-2020, 01:18 PM
ACO ACO is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,948
He sure has some interesting friends.
Reply With Quote
  #3750  
Old 02-15-2020, 01:23 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
At least he's not part of any claims. Disgusting ppl though.


LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #3751  
Old 02-15-2020, 02:08 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 21,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fijiro View Post
I'm just going to leave this here - Prince Andrew is named in another sex scandal
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ung-women.html
He isn't named in another sex scandal. He, once, 20 years ago, stayed at the home of someone who is currently being accused.

You'll notice the other high profiled guests in the picture with Sarah, Beatrice and Eugenie being Pavlos and Marie Chantal of Greece. Other people to have stayed with Nygard are the likes of Oprah Winfrey, George H W Bush and Robert De Niro.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #3752  
Old 02-15-2020, 07:03 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Member - in Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
This!

Prime example of how Andrew somehow having a connection to an accusation that is now happening really is not breaking news. Andrew is about as much involved in any sexual accusations as our own sarahedwards2 and her mom are because they happened to like and admire the guy's line of clothing.

Once again it proves that if its in the Daily Mail, it will result in profits for the Daily Mail as people buy into their stories. Free enterprise at its best (or worse)?
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
Reply With Quote
  #3753  
Old 02-16-2020, 03:26 AM
Lady Daly's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sherwood, United States
Posts: 865
I think this time round Andrew might be a victim by association along with a host of dozens of other well knowns. Nothing to see here!
Reply With Quote
  #3754  
Old 02-16-2020, 06:59 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 919


Guilty by association or judged by the company he kept?

This is all very unpleasent... - but not as unpleasent as the character of the molesters.

And - What I find interesting: Princes, yes, of which I thought mingled mainly with other Princes and nobility, they had quite a adventurous life with not so noble persons. Is this a good sign, that they have so many social contacts with the commoners? Or should they have been more sticking to their own strata? /sacasm off
Reply With Quote
  #3755  
Old 02-16-2020, 10:31 AM
Lady Daly's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sherwood, United States
Posts: 865
Several papers are running the Peter Nygard lawsuit, none actually implicate Prince Andrew. It is very ugly not unlike the Jeffrey Epstein controversy but Prince Andrew appears to have nothing to do with Peter Nygards trafficking ring. Ick!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/peter-nygard...suit-1.5463684

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/p...gard-ntgf5prvl
Reply With Quote
  #3756  
Old 02-16-2020, 10:37 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Daly View Post
Several papers are running the Peter Nygard lawsuit, none actually implicate Prince Andrew. It is very ugly not unlike the Jeffrey Epstein controversy but Prince Andrew appears to have nothing to do with Peter Nygards trafficking ring. Ick!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/peter-nygard...suit-1.5463684

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/p...gard-ntgf5prvl
I know that a lot of rich people who have a party lifestyle hang around with people of this kind.. but IMO its not edifying that P Andrew should be mentioned as associating with more than 1 person who does this kind fo thing.
Reply With Quote
  #3757  
Old 02-16-2020, 11:03 AM
Lady Daly's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sherwood, United States
Posts: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
I know that a lot of rich people who have a party lifestyle hang around with people of this kind.. but IMO its not edifying that P Andrew should be mentioned as associating with more than 1 person who does this kind fo thing.
It looks really bad, doesn't it. This is why I spent a little time investigating. There's an intricate back story involving billionaire Louis Bacon, Peter Nygard's Bahamian neighbor. But again, I found nothing implicating Prince Andrew, I hope that continues to be the case.
Reply With Quote
  #3758  
Old 02-16-2020, 11:04 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Daly View Post
It looks really bad, doesn't it. This is why I spent a little time investigating. There's an intricate back story involving billionaire Louis Bacon, Peter Nygard's Bahamian neighbor. But again, I found nothing implicating Prince Andrew, I hope that continues to be the case.
It doesn't really matter. He is compromised already by his assocaiton with Epstein. This is yet another sleazy person he associated with..
Reply With Quote
  #3759  
Old 02-16-2020, 11:40 AM
Lady Daly's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sherwood, United States
Posts: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
It doesn't really matter. He is compromised already by his assocaiton with Epstein. This is yet another sleazy person he associated with..
Absolutely true, it's just this time the association appears to be a visit to Nygard's Bahamian island estate with his family, Sarah, Beatrice and Eugenie over 20 years ago. Not the ongoing multi-year relationship including allegations, pictures and reports from the victims included in the Epstein controversy. But true, Andrew and sleaze meet again.
Reply With Quote
  #3760  
Old 02-16-2020, 08:09 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
This!



Prime example of how Andrew somehow having a connection to an accusation that is now happening really is not breaking news. Andrew is about as much involved in any sexual accusations as our own sarahedwards2 and her mom are because they happened to like and admire the guy's line of clothing.



Once again it proves that if its in the Daily Mail, it will result in profits for the Daily Mail as people buy into their stories. Free enterprise at its best (or worse)?


The owner of the ladiesí consignment store around the corner from my house is no longer accepting Nygard products because of the so-called scandal.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
#princedubai #rashidmrm abolished monarchies all tags america arcadie arcadie claret bevilacqua british caribbean caroline charles iii claret current events danish royal family defunct thrones duarte pio edward vii elizabeth ii emperor naruhito fabio bevilacqua fallen empires genealogy general news grace kelly grimaldi hamdan bin ahmed harry history hollywood hotel room for sale house of gonzaga introduction jewels jordan royal family king king charles king willem-alexander mall coronation day matrilineal monaco monarchy need help new zealand; cyclone gabrielle official visit order of precedence order of the redeemer pamela hicks portugal preferences prince christian princess of orange queen queen camilla queen elizabeth ii queen ena of spain queen margrethe ii queen mathilde queen maxima republics restoration royal without thrones silk spain spanish royal family state visit to germany switzerland tiaras visit william


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2023
Jelsoft Enterprises