The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #3361  
Old 12-02-2019, 06:56 PM
texankitcat's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,004
I haven’t been able to watch the interview yet since I am in the US and can’t get BBC One. If anyone of any other way to see it, please let know.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3362  
Old 12-02-2019, 07:12 PM
ACO ACO is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillVictoria View Post
The issue in question appears to be timing. Andrew sent out the email at 5:50 am on 1/3/15, although we don't know for what timezone.

While I can't get an exact timeline, some cursory examination shows that while Roberts gave her affidavit on 1/2/15, her name was not known to the public until the next day. This is why the timestamp is important: if Andrew sent that message before Virginia Roberts Giuffre was confirmed as Jane Doe 3 then (unless he can prove someone in the palace was tipped off to her name before the press) his "I don't know her" alibi goes up in smoke.
Interesting. Though I wouldn't be surprised he was tipped off to her name. These people have access to a wealth of information. But it is also telling that he would email her needing more information. It just seems funny for a man who claims to never to have meet her being concerned she was one of her girls. He didn't exactly say it it but it is clearly implied he knows that Maxwell knows Virginia. So much for that picture being fake. Either way this hardly looks good.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3363  
Old 12-02-2019, 07:33 PM
Leopoldine's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
but that's what Andy seems to have been doing. And there have been rumours and questions flyng around for some time about his expensive lifestyle and Fergie's and people askng how it is funded? So the queen and other royals must be aware of the talk.. and IMO they should have kept an eye on Andrew and asked a few hard questions some years ago...

If you look at Sarah's recent trip to Saudi Arabia which coincided with lurid and damning news "back home" about Andrew regarding his association with Epstein, you have to wonder about the British government and HM's staff view of Sarah and Andrew's freewheeling interaction with Gulf countries.

HM has relationships with many of the Gulf leaders due to a shared love of thoroughbred racing and breeding. It has always been handled delicately, these middle east investments toward the sport. Ascot, for one. Nobody made a fuss.

Now, Sarah, with her "better half" under the Epstein spotlight, is filmed in Saudi Arabia making a speech about the kindness of the leadership of the country. This brings into question human rights issues there, potentially pulls our beloved HM into another tainted spotlight … and makes one gawp at what dunderheads Sarah and Andrew are!
Reply With Quote
  #3364  
Old 12-02-2019, 08:14 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Coastal California, United States
Posts: 1,210
Being in the U.S. I haven’t watched the interview. According to this article https://uk.news.yahoo.com/prince-and...qfhmlJVSC95tmb
Five women claim that Andrew saw the massages being given at Epstein’s homes??
Second article about the lawyer for 5 women claiming Andrew saw massages https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50633640
Reply With Quote
  #3365  
Old 12-02-2019, 08:19 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St Thomas, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Posts: 2,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillVictoria View Post
The issue in question appears to be timing. Andrew sent out the email at 5:50 am on 1/3/15, although we don't know for what timezone.

While I can't get an exact timeline, some cursory examination shows that while Roberts gave her affidavit on 1/2/15, her name was not known to the public until the next day. This is why the timestamp is important: if Andrew sent that message before Virginia Roberts Giuffre was confirmed as Jane Doe 3 then (unless he can prove someone in the palace was tipped off to her name before the press) his "I don't know her" alibi goes up in smoke.
Is it possible that he could have remembered or looked up her name from the interview in 2011 in which she first publicly described meeting him through Jeffrey Epstein?
Reply With Quote
  #3366  
Old 12-02-2019, 08:26 PM
Leopoldine's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 651
Well, who released that personal communication between HRH The Duke of York and Epstein's purported pimp Maxwell?
Reply With Quote
  #3367  
Old 12-02-2019, 08:27 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wherever I wish, United States
Posts: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatiana Maria View Post
Is it possible that he could have remembered or looked up her name from the interview in 2011 in which she first publicly described meeting him through Jeffrey Epstein?
It is possible, I didn't find those articles in my first pass through (and 2011 was before I was royal-watching) but I don't know if he'd be able to say definitively Jane Doe 3 was Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #3368  
Old 12-02-2019, 08:32 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St Thomas, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Posts: 2,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillVictoria View Post
It is possible, I didn't find those articles in my first pass through (and 2011 was before I was royal-watching) but I don't know if he'd be able to say definitively Jane Doe 3 was Roberts
There is a link to the 2011 interview here:

http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...ml#post1210635
Reply With Quote
  #3369  
Old 12-02-2019, 08:36 PM
texankitcat's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leopoldine View Post
Well, who released that personal communication between HRH The Duke of York and Epstein's purported pimp Maxwell?
Good question. We certainly know,it wasn’t Andrew! We’re they hacked and passed on to the media or did someone who had access to Andrew’s emails pass them on.....hmmmmm..
Reply With Quote
  #3370  
Old 12-02-2019, 08:52 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Coastal California, United States
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leopoldine View Post
Well, who released that personal communication between HRH The Duke of York and Epstein's purported pimp Maxwell?
Perhaps the email was obtained during discovery in the civil case that Ghislaine Maxwell recently settled w/ Ms. Roberts?
Reply With Quote
  #3371  
Old 12-02-2019, 09:21 PM
lucien's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 7,007
Honestly,I don´t give a hoot or whatever for what happens with that waste of space,at all.He always was a waste of space without any clear contribution to GB except in name.A selfish non-entity.

I only worry about his Mother,as he,aledgedly,is Her favorite son.Be that what it may it must have been a real blow to Her,one of Her worst personsal crisis of Her Reign.And on top of it all in Her present age.Her staff and his eldest Brother can clean up the mess he created and the blow it gave to the Monarchy itself.

He is to never again appear in public,not just temporarely,but forever.And he ruined what should have been a festive event,the coming wedding of his daughter.If he is wise...LOL...wise and Andy in one sentence,it doesn't get more laugheble...If he has guts...no..wrong again...He can just issue a statement he has a cold on the wedding day and not show face.What a poor excuse for a human,or a son,or a dad,or a member of that Family.Any family.

Oh,and by the way..How exactlly did all these girls get involved with Epstein and his lot?How?They had a choice but were lured in with promises of goodies?Excitement?Greedy snotnoses at the time?What?They had their goodies,walked in there themselves and now scream bloody murder and more.Yes,well,dumb,criminal even,to get involved in them..and another thing..that generation knew & knows more about anything related in that specific sort of thing then most knew in older generations at their age....So,if you burn your butt,sit on the blisters.Next!!Oh yes,a book,write a book or have a ghostwriter write that for them..and make a buck...In the end it's all about that..vulgar,both sides are vulgar to the core.
Reply With Quote
  #3372  
Old 12-03-2019, 02:17 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 21,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody View Post
That was my thought as well. This email just confirms that by 2015 he wanted more information because he had been accused. He didn't randomly start sending an email enquiring information about a teenager he met about 10 years earlier.
There's absolutely nothing new in what Mrs Roberts said last night, she's repeating the same things she's been saying for years.

It has been confirmed that the Met Police have no new lines of enquiry and will not be pursuing HRH in the UK. Rumours are coming out of the US about Andrew being interviewed voluntarily by the FBI, but it's nothing concrete.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WillVictoria View Post
The issue in question appears to be timing. Andrew sent out the email at 5:50 am on 1/3/15, although we don't know for what timezone.

While I can't get an exact timeline, some cursory examination shows that while Roberts gave her affidavit on 1/2/15, her name was not known to the public until the next day. This is why the timestamp is important: if Andrew sent that message before Virginia Roberts Giuffre was confirmed as Jane Doe 3 then (unless he can prove someone in the palace was tipped off to her name before the press) his "I don't know her" alibi goes up in smoke.
I don't mean to be annoying, but which format are your dates in? American or UK because that could mean different things.

But you are completely correct in your statement, I for one don't believe that nobody knew Virgina's name before she was confirmed.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #3373  
Old 12-03-2019, 07:20 AM
Duke of Marmalade's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 13,676
I hope that Andrew will become a total pariah, socially and in business. That it the only thing that will really hurt him.
Reply With Quote
  #3374  
Old 12-03-2019, 07:45 AM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,831
See how easily these folks lie when it comes to their relationship with Epstein:
https://mobile.twitter.com/MaxFoster...07337834602496

They’re so quick to lie, knowing that we have receipts to back up the truth.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #3375  
Old 12-03-2019, 07:49 AM
Madame Verseau's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 1,671
Show of hands: who saw this coming

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ture-them.html

Not surprising Trump threw Andrew under the double decker bus.
Reply With Quote
  #3376  
Old 12-03-2019, 08:27 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 11,975
Most Americans (as in the vast majority) will care less about Trump's connections to a British Royal or his defense of one...if he actually tries to defend him.
LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #3377  
Old 12-03-2019, 10:35 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Marmalade View Post
I hope that Andrew will become a total pariah, socially and in business. That it the only thing that will really hurt him.
He wont become a social pariah. He will always find people who will hang round with him, in spite of his charities giving him the push.. because of his social status..
Reply With Quote
  #3378  
Old 12-03-2019, 11:53 AM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
Most Americans (as in the vast majority) will care less about Trump's connections to a British Royal or his defense of one...if he actually tries to defend him.




LaRae
This is about lies. Bold-faced lies. These men are lying about any connection they have with Epstein. Trump knows what’s going down with Andrew over his connection with Epstein, so Trump (not surprised) decided to lie about not knowing Andrew, when he know damn well his relationship with Andrew goes back and goes back to their days with Epstein and Maxwell.

These folks are just disgusting and natural born liars. Again, there are receipts to back up the real truth.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #3379  
Old 12-03-2019, 12:15 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Coastal California, United States
Posts: 1,210
There’s a witness to Andrew at Tramp w/ Roberts https://news.google.com/articles/CAI...S&ceid=US%3Aen
I’m not surprised, if you are as famous as Andrew is you are noticed & people remember. I saw a famous musician at a bar when I was in college many years ago - I couldn’t tell you the exact date, but I still remember seeing him.
So now there are 2 witnesses confirming they saw Andrew with Roberts, this new one and the witness who’s testified under oath that Andrew was with Roberts in NY (the young lady who’s breast he pawed in what I call the puppet incident.)
Reply With Quote
  #3380  
Old 12-03-2019, 12:16 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 14,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
This is about lies. Bold-faced lies. These men are lying about any connection they have with Epstein. Trump knows what’s going down with Andrew over his connection with Epstein, so Trump (not surprised) decided to lie about not knowing Andrew, when he know damn well his relationship with Andrew goes back and goes back to their days with Epstein and Maxwell.

These folks are just disgusting and natural born liars. Again, there are receipts to back up the real truth.
Do you have any credible sources to back up those "facts" you just presented? Can you show the "receipts" that back them up? Inquiring minds want to know.
__________________

__________________
"All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life : he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself." - Chief Seattle 1854
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 25 (4 members and 21 guests)
Alouette, AutumnKitty, HighGoalHighDreams, Winnie
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
#royalrelatives #royalgenes althorp anastasia anastasia once upon a time ancestry belgian royal family castles chittagong cht danish history diana princess of wales dna dutch royal family dutch royals emperor family tree foundation future games haakon vii henry v hill house of bourbon house of saxe-coburg and gotha intro jacobite jewelry jumma kids movie king salman list of rulers lithuanian castles mailing mary: crown princess of denmark memoir monaco history nobel 2019 norway norwegian royal family palaces palestine popularity prince daniel princess elizabeth princess margaret pronunciation random facts royal children royal court royal marriage royal re-enactments. royal wedding russian court dress russian imperial family saudi arabia snowdon spanish history spencer family state visit swedish royal family swedish royalty thailand tracts united states of america unsubscribe videos visit from sweden wedding gown wittelsbach working royals; full-time royals; part-time royals;


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×