The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #261  
Old 01-02-2015, 12:18 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,912
Well if there was hope of Andrew maintaining a role in the monarchy under Charles, I think this may just end those dreams. True or not, bad PR

Prince Andrew named in US court papers over claims he had sex with underage girl | Royal | News | Daily Express
Quote:
A WOMAN has claimed in court papers that she was repeatedly forced to have sex with Prince Andrew while being loaned out as an underage sex slave.

The woman, who cannot be named, alleges that the Duke of York was among a group of rich and powerful men that she was forced to have intimate relations with by American investment banker Jeffrey Epstein.

The untested allegations against the Duke of York - who vehemently denies them - are contained in a motion filed in a United States court in Florida this week, according to The Guardian.

It relates to a long-running lawsuit brought by women who say they were exploited by Mr Epstein, a multi-millionaire convicted of soliciting sex with an underage girl, after a plea deal.

The woman insists that between 1999 and 2002 she was repeatedly sexually abused by Epstein, who she also accuses of loaning her out to influential men around the world.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #262  
Old 01-02-2015, 12:34 PM
Arrjann's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
The royals simply carry on no matter.
Of course they do. But I'm talking about Andrew.
__________________

__________________
Avatar: HRH Princess Margaretha of Liechtenstein (née Princess of Luxembourg) and I

Follow me on Twitter: @royalarjan
Reply With Quote
  #263  
Old 01-02-2015, 12:52 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Top End, Australia
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalistbert View Post
Prince Andrew is irrverelent to the monarchy.

Prince Andrew is the son of the reigning monarch and brother of the next King. He carries out over 300 official duties each year. He is hardly irrelevant to the monarchy.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
Reply With Quote
  #264  
Old 01-02-2015, 12:53 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,191
I highly doubt it is true but it shows that Andrew has been absolutely stupid in his choice of friends/acquaintances. IMO Andrew was so bothered about keeping up with the rich jet set that it didn't mind who he had to hang out with to be part of it. Isn't Epstein the man who paid of Sarah's debts?
The problem now is Andrew has allowed himself to be seen to be so close to Epstein that any damage to him will also damage Andrew.
I suspect there will be a lot more accusations / revelations before we hear the end of this. Notice how he denies 'impropriety with underage minors' interesting choice of words IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #265  
Old 01-02-2015, 12:56 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Top End, Australia
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ana Von Cleves View Post
Well, the girl in question was 17 at the time according to what I can find, so she was just barely underage. The real question here is consent. This case will turn on that point. If it were just a case of consensual sex with a 17 year old, this case would probably be dismissed. It is only making headlines at all because they are dragging Prince Andrew into it. I can't imagine what proof can be brought at this late date.

With consent or not....I really hope it is not true. I think 50 something is a bit too old for a teenager.

If she was under the legal age it is irrelevant whether she consented or not. At law, if you are underage you are are considered to be incapable of giving consent. My understanding of the American legal system (although different in every State) is that it would be considered statutory rape.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
Reply With Quote
  #266  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:04 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,152
The Express articles says the encounters with Andrew supposedly happened in NY, London and the Caribbean. It's 16 as the age of consent in NY and UK. Later on in the article it said she was 17.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #267  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:11 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: olathe, United States
Posts: 128
This is outrageous and unbelievable !!!! I do not believe this rumor one bit !!!!! The Duchess will have his back and so will his children !!!!
Reply With Quote
  #268  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:14 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippyboo View Post
The Express articles says the encounters with Andrew supposedly happened in NY, London and the Caribbean. It's 16 as the age of consent in NY and UK. Later on in the article it said she was 17.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Even though the legal part in this is very important and legal action would make even a bigger splash, I think there is a very dark grey moral line there. If this comes out to be true (legal or not) there will be a huge scandal since such behavior is not accepted by the public. I think if this doesn't calm down very fast, Andrew might have to step out of his royal role fully.
Reply With Quote
  #269  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:17 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: olathe, United States
Posts: 128
What is the evidence saying he did this unspeakable thing ?
Reply With Quote
  #270  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:20 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebbevb View Post
What is the evidence saying he did this unspeakable thing ?
None at all at the moment as far as I know. But it's out there now (true or not) and the harm has already been done. Even if it comes out that he didn't do anything it will still highlight his connection with someone who did and imply that he knew/helped with it. It is a PR disaster. In the image of him it kind of doesn't matter now if he did it or not (ofc it does in the real world, but not as far as his image goes). The harm has already been done. Please though, let it not be true!!
Reply With Quote
  #271  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:21 PM
ROYAL NORWAY's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: somewhere, Norway
Posts: 3,808
I highly doubt it is true, but it is very damaging to him. Prince Andrew has only himself to blame for this.
__________________
Norwegians are girls who love girls, boys who love boys, and girls and boys who love each other. King Harald V speaking in 2016.
Reply With Quote
  #272  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:45 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 21,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebbevb View Post
This is outrageous and unbelievable !!!! I do not believe this rumor one bit !!!!! The Duchess will have his back and so will his children !!!!

Doesn't matter who has his back, his reputation (what he had) is in the gutter right now.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #273  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:46 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,981
Didn't we already know this ? I'm sure I remember reading about his involvement with all this a couple of years ago.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #274  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:46 PM
Mermaid1962's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,304
He has categorically denied that he sexually abused a minor. As reluctant as I am to admit it, this sounds like legal-speak. Prince Andrew has always shown a lack of judgment IMO. Now all the work that he has done for young people will seem suspect, which is a real shame. I hope that his denials are true. I feel so badly for his daughters and the Queen.
Reply With Quote
  #275  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:52 PM
Duke of Marmalade's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 13,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ana Von Cleves View Post
Well, the girl in question was 17 at the time according to what I can find, so she was just barely underage.
This argument didn't work for Franck Ribery either. How stupid can one be.

I agree that Prince Andrew has always shown a lack of judgment, there are countless examples.
Reply With Quote
  #276  
Old 01-02-2015, 01:57 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: olathe, United States
Posts: 128
The years in question don't make sense to me
Reply With Quote
  #277  
Old 01-02-2015, 02:04 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 15,334
I'm hoping the allegations against Andrew are false and that citing his name as he was a personal friend of Epstein is no more than name dropping to make a case get wider publicity.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
Reply With Quote
  #278  
Old 01-02-2015, 02:33 PM
ROYAL NORWAY's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: somewhere, Norway
Posts: 3,808
Prince Andrew has always shown a lack of judgment, and now he pays the price for it. I reckon that there will be more accusations. The press will love this.
__________________
Norwegians are girls who love girls, boys who love boys, and girls and boys who love each other. King Harald V speaking in 2016.
Reply With Quote
  #279  
Old 01-02-2015, 02:37 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,912
Someone on Twitter said the lawsuit was filed in Florida because the age of consent there is 18
Reply With Quote
  #280  
Old 01-02-2015, 03:02 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,191
I'm sure the lawyers and co will try and make as much fuss as possible in this case possibly in the hope of securing a big payout to end the case, the more they can embarrass epstine and Andrew the more likely it is to happen.
Personally I'm sure Andrew won't have been involved with it himself BUT if it turns out he knew about it or saw anything then God help him in the media.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
#royalrelatives #royalgenes anastasia 2020 armstrong-jones baptism biography bridal gown british brownbitcoinqueen canada chittagong coronavirus countess of snowdon cover-up dna duke of sussex dutch royal family emperor fantasy movie george vi gustaf vi adolf haakon vii heraldry hill history interesting introduction israel jack brooksbank jewelry jumma kent list of rulers luxembourg nepal nepalese royal family nobel 2019 norway history popularity prince charles prince constantijn prince daniel princess alexia (2005 -) princess chulabhorn princess dita queen consort queen maud queen maxima royal balls royal court royal events royal family royal jewels royal spouse royalty royal wedding russian court dress settings spain startling new evidence stuart swedish queen swedish royal family thailand tips tracts united kingdom united states of america visit from sweden von hofmannsthal wedding gown


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×